Pengukuran Kinerja dan Akuntabilitas Publik di Indonesia Studi Awal di Pemerintah Daerah

https://doi.org/10.22146/jaap.35332

Rusdi Akbar(1*)

(1) Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article presents initial findings about public accountability and performance measurement practices in Indonesian local government institutions. Moreover, this article provides accountability tools, content, and reason. In addition, factors affecting performance measurement practices, and indications of the existence of institutional isomorphism are also discussed.

Keywords


akuntabilitas, pengukuran kinerja pemerintah daerah, isomorfisma

Full Text:

PDF


References

Allen, R.S., & Helms, M.M., 2002, ‘Employee perception of the relationship between strategy, rewards and organizational performance’, Journal of Business Strategies 19 (2), 115-139.

Alm, J., & Bahl, R., 2000, ‘Fiscal decen-tralization in Indonesia: Prospects, problems, and the way forward’, dipresentasikan di USAID, September.

Ammons, D.N., 1995, ‘Overcoming the inadequacies of performance measurement in local government: The Case of Libraries and Leisure Services’, Public Adminis-tration Review 55(1), 37-47.

Ammons, D.N., & Rivenbark, W.C., 2008, ‘factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project’, Public Adminis-tration Review 68(2), 304-318.

Anderson, S.W., & Young, S. M., 1999, ‘The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 24(7), 525-559.

Ashworth, R., et al, 2007, ‘Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational change and isomorphic pressures in the public sector’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(1), 165-187.

Babbie, E. R, 1990, Survey research methods. 2nd edn., Wadsworth Pub. Co., Belmont, Calif.

Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C., 2006, ‘To conform or to perform? mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences’, Journal of Management Studies 43(7), 1559-1581.

Barry, C. A., 1998, ‘Choosing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Atlas/ti and Nudist Compared’, Sociological Research Online, (3).

Bastian, I., 2007, ‘The change of local financial management organization from an administrative to an entrepreneurship: A case of Kepmendagri 29/2002’, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan 6(2), 137-150.

Behn, R.D., 2003, ‘Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures’, Public Administration Review 63(5), 586-606.

Bellamy, S., & Kluvers, R., 1995, ‘Program budgeting in Australian local government: A study of implementation and outcomes’, Financial Accountability & Management 11(1), 39.

Beyer, J.M., & Trice, H.M., 1982, ‘The utilization process: A conceptual frame-work and synthesis of empirical findings’, Administrative Science Quarterly 27(4), 591-622.

Boyne, G., et al., 2002, ‘Plans, performance informations and accountability: The case of best value’, Public Administration, 80(4), 691-710.

Brignall, S., & Modell, S., 2000, ‘An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the new public sector’, Management Accounting Research 11, 281-306.

Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J., 1992, ‘Changes in the public sector: A review of recent 'alternative' accounting research’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 5(2), 3-31.

Cavalluzzo, K.S., & Ittner, C.D., 2004, ‘Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(3-4), 243-267.

Cooper, D.R., & Schindler, P.S., 2006, Business research methods. 9th edn., Mc Graw Hill, New York.

de Lancer Julnes, P., 2006, ‘Performance measurement: An effective tool for government accountability? The debate goes on’, Evaluation 12, 219.

de Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M., 2001, ‘Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation’, Public Administration Review 61(6), 693-708.

Delaney, J.T., & Huselid, M.A., 1996, ‘The impact of human resources management practices on perceptions or organizational performance’, Academy of Management Journal 39, 949-969.

Dess, G., and Robinson, R., 1984, Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately held firm and conglomerate business units’, Strategic Management Journal 5, 265-273.

DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W., 1983, ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomor-phism and collective rationality in organi¬za-tional fields’, American Sociological Review 48, 147-160.

Dolinger, M.J., & Golden, P.A., 1992, ‘Interorganizational and collective strategies in small firms: environmental effects and performance’, Journal of Management 18, 695-715.

Foster, G., & Swenson, D.W., 1997, ‘measuring the success of activity-based cost management and its determinants’, Journal of Management Accounting Research 9, 109-141.

Fowles, A.J., 1993, ‘Changing notion of accountability: A social policy view’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 6(3), 97-108.

Gianakis, G.A., 2002, ‘The promise of public sector performance measurement: Anody¬ne or placebo?’, Public Administration Quarterly 26(1), 34-64.

Hatry, H.P., 1980, ‘Performance measurement: Principles and techniques’, Public Productivity Review December, 312-339.

Hatry, H.P., 2002, ‘Performance measurement: Fashions and fallacies’, Public Performance and Management Review 25(4), 352-358.

Hood, C. 1991. ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration 6(3), 3-19.

Hood, C. 1995. ‘New public management in the 1980s: Variation and a theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 20, 93-109.

Hoque, Z., & Moll, J., 2001, ‘Public sector reform: Implications for accounting, accountability and performance of state-owned entities-an australian perspectives’, The International Journal of Public Sector Management 14 (4/5), 304-326.

Hughes, O.E., 2003, Public Management and Administration. 3th edn., Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Hyndman, N.S., & Anderson, R., 1995, ‘The use of performance information in external reporting: An empirical study of UK Executive's Agencies’, Financial Accoun-tability and Management 11(1), 1-17.

Ittner, C.D., & Larker, D.F., 1998, ‘Innovations and performance measurement: Trends and research implications’, Journal of Management Accounting Research 10, 205-238.

Johnsen, A., 2005, ‘Determinants of non-mandatory performance measurement in Norwegian local government: A comparison of political, economic and sociological explanations’, artikel dipresentasikan di The Study Group of Productivit and Quality in

Public Sector at the European Group of Public Administration (EGPA) Conference. Switzerland.

Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2004, ‘Mixed methods research: A Research paradigm whose time has come’, Educational Researcher 33(7), 14-26.

Kim, S., 2004, ‘Individual level factors and organizational performance in government organization’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(2), 245-261.

Kim, S., & Lee, H., 2006, ‘The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities’, Public Adminis¬tration Review 66(3), 370-385.

Kloot, L., 1999, ‘Performance measurement and accountability in Victorian local government’, The International Journal of Public Sector Management 12 (7), 565-584.

Laegreid, P., et al., 2007, ‘Modern management tools in state agencies: The case of Norway’, International Public Manage¬ment Journal, 10(4), 387-413.

Lapsley, I., 2008, ‘The NPM Agenda: Back to the future’, Financial Accountability and Management 24(1), 77-96.

Laurensius, F., & Halim, A., 2005, ‘Pengaruh faktor-faktor rasional, politik dan kultur organisasi terhadap pemanfaatan informasi kinerja instansi Pemerintah Daerah’, Proceeding of 8th National Accounting Symposium, hal. 774-790.

Lee, J., & Fisher, G., 2007, ‘The perceived usefulness and use of performance information in the Australian public sector’, Accounting, Accountability and Performance 13(1), 42-73.

LOGOTRI, 2003, ‘Performance measurement and management in Asian-Pasific local government’, artikel dipresentasikan di A Discussion Paper and Investigation into Future Directions.

Mardiasmo, 2002, Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.

McCracken, M. J., et al., 2001, ‘Measuring organizational performance in the hospital industry: An exploratory comparison of objective and subjective methods’, Health Services Management Research 14, 211-219.

McLaughlin, J.A., & Jordan, G.B., 1999, ‘Logic models: A tool for telling your program's performance story’, Evaluation and Program Planning 22, 6-72.

McPhee, I., 2005, ‘Outcomes and outputs: Are we managing better as a result?’, artikel dipresentasikan di CPA National Public Sector Convention.

Meijer, A.J., 2003, ‘Transparent government: Parliamentary and legal accountability in an information age’, Information Policy 8 (1/2), 67-78.

Midwinter, A., 1994, ‘Developing performance indicators for local government: The Scottish experience’, Public Money & Management 14(2), 37-43.

Moynihan, D.P., & Pandey, S.K., 2004, ‘Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3), 421-439.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T., 1992, Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts.

Pilcher, R.A., 2005, ‘Local government financial key performance indicators-not so relevant, reliable and accountable’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54(56), 451-467.

Pilcher, R.A., 2007, ‘Preliminary empirical evidence of institutional isomorphism in local authorities’, artikel dipresentasikan di Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society. Research Paper. Curtin University of Technology, Australia.

Podger, O., & Perwira, I., 2004, ‘Review of legislation on planning and budgeting’, artikel dipresentasikan di Bappenas and ADB, Jakarta.

Powell, T.C., 1992, ‘Organizational alignment as competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal 13(2), 119-134.

Schmid, H., 2002, ‘Relationships between organizational properties and organiza¬tional effectiveness in three types of nonprofit human services organiza¬tions’, Public Personnel Management 31: 377-395.

Scott, R.W., 1987, ‘The adolescence of institutional theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly 32(4), 493-511.

Seale, C., 2000, ‘Using computers to analyze qualitative data’, dalam Silverman (Ed.), Doing Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, London.

Sechrest, L., & Sidana, S., 1995, ‘Quantitative and qualitative methods: is there an alternative?’, Evaluation and Program Planning 18(1), 77-87.

Selznick, P., 1996, ‘Institutionalism "Old" and "New"’, Administrative Science Quarterly 4(2), 270-277.

Shields, M.D., 1995, ‘An empirical analysis of firms' implementation experiences with activity-based costing’, Journal of Management Accounting Research 7(4), 148-166.

Stewart, J., & Walsh, K., 1994, ‘Performance measureent: When performance can never be finally defined’, Public Money and Management April-June: 45-49.

Sydenstricker-Neto, J., 2008, ‘Research design and mixed-research approach a hands-on experience’, dilihat pada 1 April 2008, dari www.socialresearchmethods.net.

ter Bogt, H.J., 2004, ‘Politicians in search of performance information? Survey research on Dutch Aldermen's use of performance information’, Financial Accountability and Management 20(3), 221-252.

Tilbury, C., 2006, ‘Accountability via perfor-mance measurement: The case of Child Protection services’, Australian Journal of Public Administration 65(3), 48-61.

Tolbert, P.S., & Zucker, L.G., 1983, ‘Institutinal sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of Civil Services Reform 1880-1935’, Administrative Science Quarterly 28(1), 22-39.

Turner, M., 2000, ‘Implementing Accoun-tability in Autonomous Region’, artikel dipresentasaikan di ADB dan Indonesian Ministry of Human Affair.

van Dooren, W., 2005, ‘What makes organizations measure? Hypotheses on the causes and conditions for performance measurement’, Financial Accountability and Management 21(3), 363-383.

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V., 1987, ‘Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence’, Journal of Management, 13, 109-122.

Wang, X., 2002, ‘Assessing administrative accountability’, American Review of Public Administration 32(3), 350-370.

Yang, K., & Hsieh, J.Y., 2007, ‘Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement: Testing a middle-range model’, Public Administration Review 67(5), 861-879.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jaap.35332

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 19002 | views : 39381

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Akuntabilitas Publik (JAAP)