Economic Value of Forest Hydrological Benefit of Musi Watershed: Case of Perapau Sub Watershed

https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.36087

Nur Arifatul Ulya(1*)

(1) Environment and Forestry Research and Development Institute of Palembang Jl. Kol. H. Burlian Km. 6,5 Punti Kayu, Palembang, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Forest area in upper Perapau sub watershed that provide a hydrological benefit for community living surrounding are now partially converted to plantations, dry land farms and paddy fields, whereas the forests are part of protected forest and wildlife reserve. The land cover change occurs due to lack of understanding about economic value of hydrological benefits of forests in the Perapau sub watershed. This study aims to determine the economic value of hydrological benefits of forests in Perapau sub watershed. Procurement cost method used to estimate the economic value of the hydrological benefits of the Perapau sub watershed.  The economic value of hydrological benefits for household and agricultural purposes is 1.712 trillion rupiah and 11.056 billion rupiah. Based on the economic value of hydrological benefit, sustainability of forest in the upstream of Perapau sub watershed must be supported for sustainability of hydrological services of watershed.

Keywords


water for household, water for agriculture, procurement cost, Semende

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Cervigni, R., & Moran, D. (2010). Total Economic Value in Mexico of Forests. Ambio, 24(5), 286–296.

Admiraal, J. F., Wossink, A., de Groot, W. T., & de Snoo, G. R. (2013). More than total economic value: How to combine economic valuation of biodiversity with ecological resilience. Ecological Economics, 89, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.009

Ahmad, A., & Quegan, S. (2012). Analysis of Maximum

Likelihood Classification on Multispectral Data. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 6(129), 6425–6436. https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2013.34214

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Muara Enim. (2016). Kecamatan Semende Darat laut Dalam Angka Tahun 2016. Muara Enim: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Muara Enim.

Bateman, I. J., Mace, G. M., Fezzi, C., Atkinson, G., & Turner, K. (2011). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(2), 177–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x

Berbel, J., Mesa-Jurado, A., & Pistón, J. M. (2011). Value of Irrigation Water in Guadalquivir Basin (Spain) by Residual Value Method. Water Resources Management, 25(6), 1565–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9761-2

Bolstad, P. V, & Lillesand, T. M. (1991). Rapid maximum likelihood classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57(1), 67–74. Retrieved from http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=19507068

Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758

Brookhuis, B. J., & Hein, L. G. (2016). The value of the flood control service of tropical forests: A case study for Trinidad. Forest Policy and Economics, 62, 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.002

Brown, G. (2013). The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: An empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 5, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.004

Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). The Value of clean water: The public’s willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water. Water Resources Research, 29(7), 2445–2454. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00495

Carvalho-Santos, C., Honrado, J. P., & Hein, L. (2014). Hydrological services and the role of forests: Conceptualization and indicator-based analysis with an illustration at a regional scale. Ecological Complexity, 20, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.09.001

Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., … van den Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., ERvin, D., Bluffstone, R., Boyd, J., Brown, D., … Yeakly, A. (2011). Valuing ecological systems and services. F1000 Biology Reports, 3(July), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3410/B3-14

Dwiprabowo, H., Djaenudin, D., Alviya, I., & Wicaksono, D. (2014). DINAMIKA TUTUPAN LAHAN: Pengaruh Faktor Sosial Ekonomi. (I. Las & Y. Rahayu, Eds.), PT Kanisius, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PT. Kanisius.

Gong, W., Yuan, L., Fan, W., Wang, X., Stott, P., Env, N., & Tech, P. (2016). Comparison to Supervised Classification Modelling in Land Use Cover Using Landsat 8 OLI Data : An Example in Miyun County of North China, 15(1), 6268.

Groot, R. S. de, Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., … van Beukering, P. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005

Groot, R. S. de, & Meer, P. J. van der. (2010). Quantifying and valuing goods and services provided by plantation forests. In J. Bauhus, P. J. van der Meer, & M. Kanninen (Eds.), Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests (pp. 16–42). London: Earthscan.

Hanley, N., Shogren, J., & White, B. (2013). Introduction to Environmental Economics. New Jersey: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Zu0_FjaZqn8C&pgis=1

Hufschmidt, M. M., David E. James, Meister, A. D., Bower, B. T., & Dixon, J. A. (1983). Environment, natural systems , and development: an economic valuation guide (3rd ed.). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Kaimowitz, D., & Angelsen, A. (1998). Economic models of tropical deforestation: a review. Bogor: Center For International Forestry Research. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/000341

Kaldellis, J. K. (2007). The contribution of small hydro power stations to the electricity generation in Greece : Technical and economic considerations. Energy Policy, 35, 2187–2196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.021

Martin, E., Suhardjito, D., Darusman, D., Sunito, S., & Winarno, B. (2016). Tunggu Tubang and Ulu-Ayek: Social Mechanism of Sustainable Protected Forest Management. JMHT, 22(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.22.2.85

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Living Beyond Our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-being. Annual Report. Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.2111/RANGELANDS-D-13-00013.1

Munasinghe, M. (1992). Environmental economics and valuation in development decision making (Environment Working Paper No. 51). Washigton DC.

Murni, S., Whale, J., Urmee, T., Davis, J., & Harries, D. (2012). The role of micro hydro power systems in remote rural electrification : a case study in the Bawan Valley , Borneo. In Procedia Engineering (Vol. 49, pp. 189–196). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.10.127

Nurfatriani, F., & Handoyo. (2007). Nilai Ekonomi Manfaat Hidrologis Hutan di DAS Brantas Hulu untuk Pemanfaatan Non-Komersial. Info Sosial Ekonomi, 7(3), 193–214.

Raman, N., Hussein, I., & Palanisamy, K. (2009). Micro hydro potential in West Malaysia. In ICEE 2009 - Proceeding 2009 3rd International Conference on Energy and Environment: Advancement Towards Global Sustainability (pp. 348–359). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEENVIRON.2009.5398621

Rusdiana, O., & Ghufrona, R. R. (2011). Aplikasi Model Optimasi Linear Goals Programming Dalam Menentukan Pola Penggunaan Lahan Optimal. Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika, 2(1), 26–34.

Schaafsma, M., Morse-Jones, S., Posen, P., Swetnam, R. D., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., … Turner, R. K. (2014). The importance of local forest benefits: Economic valuation of non-timber forest products in the eastern Arc mountains in Tanzania. Global Environmental Change, 24(1), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.018

Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (2008). Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES.

Ulya, N. A., Warsito, S. P., Andayani, W., & Gunawan, T. (2014). Nilai ekonomi air untuk rumah tangga dan transportasi- Studi kasus di desa-desa sekitar hutan rawa gambut Merang Kepayang, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Manusia Dan Lingkungan, 21(2), 232–238.

Waluyo, E. A., Ulya, N. A., Kunarso, A., & Syahbana, T. A. A. (2016). Eksistensi Kelembagaan Pengelolaan Air di Sub DAS Perapau (Desa Muara Danau dan Desa Tanah Abang, Kecamatan Semende Darat laut, Kabupaten Muara Enim. In A. H. Lukman, F. Nurfatriani, N. E. Lelana, & R. D. Djenudin (Eds.), Tata Kelola Hutan untuk Mewujudkan Pembangunan Hijau Sumatera Selatan (pp. 241–248). Palembang: Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Palembang.

Widada, & Darusman, D. (2004). Nilai ekonomi air domestik dan irigasi pertanian: Studi kasus di desa-desa sekitar kawasan Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, X(1), 15–27.

Zorrilla-Miras, P., Palomo, I., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2014). Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: A case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.013



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.36087

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2537 | views : 2339

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2019 Indonesian Journal of Geography

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Accredited Journal, Based on Decree of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia Number 225/E/KPT/2022, Vol 54 No 1 the Year 2022 - Vol 58 No 2 the Year 2026 (accreditation certificate download)

ISSN 2354-9114 (online), ISSN 0024-9521 (print)

Web Analytics IJG STATISTIC