Tweets Flooded in Bandung 2016 Floods: Connecting Individuals and Organizations to Disaster Information

https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.34767

Anang Dwi Santoso(1*)

(1) Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Sriwijaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


In a natural disaster, social media has been widely used as one of the primary communication channels to supplement the traditional ones. However, there is a lack of empirical research analyzing this evidence, therefore the purpose of this study is to identify the information shared by Twitter users during the Bandung Flood of 2016 based on period, location, and account ownership. A dataset of 754 tweets was acquired using the NCapture feature in NVivo for content analysis. The study found that social media has significant benefits primarily when sharing information from affected areas to communities outside the region. In more detail, Twitter is used by 28.4%, primarily by those not impacted by the flood, to express good wishes and memorializing. It is because people in the affected area shared firsthand information (23.8%) to them. Then, in addition to citizens, media, NGOs, government, and community leaders who have been found in earlier studies, actors such as civil service organizations (2.9%) and political parties (0.5%) have also participated in disaster relief.


Keywords


disaster communication; social media; natural disaster; flood

Full Text:

PDF


References

Alexander, D. E. (2014). Social Media in Disaster Risk Reduction and Crisis Management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9502-z

Beneito-Montagut, R., Anson, S., Shaw, D., & Brewster, C. (2013). Governmental Social Media use for Emergency Communication. In Governmental SM use for Emergency Communication (pp. 828–833).

Binder, A. R. (2012). Figuring out #fukushima: An initial look at the functions and content of US twitter commentary about nuclear risk. Environmental Communication, 6(2), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.672442

Bucher, R. (1957). Blame and Hostility in Disaster. American Journal of Sociology, 62(5), 467–475. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2773239

Caragea, C. ., Squicciarini, A. ., Stehle, S. ., Neppalli, K. ., & Tapia, A. . (2014). Mapping moods: Geo-mapped sentiment analysis during hurricane sandy. In ISCRAM 2014 Conference Proceedings - 11th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (pp. 642–651). Retrieved from http://www.iscram.org/legacy/ISCRAM2014/papers/p29.pdf

Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., Stefanidis, A., & Radzikowski, J. (2013). #Earthquake: Twitter as a Distributed Sensor System. Transactions in GIS, 17(1), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01359.x

Freberg, K., & Palenchar, M. J. (2013). The convergence of Digital Negotiation and Risk Challenges: strategic Implications of Social Media for Risk and Crisis Communications. In H. S. N. Al-Deen & J. A. Hendricks (Eds.), Social Media and Strategic Communications (I, pp. 83–100). New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.

Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Hode, M. G., Halliwell, M. R., … Griffith, S. a. (2014). Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092

Jaeger, P. T., Shneiderman, B., Fleischmann, K. R., Preece, J., Qu, Y., & Fei Wu, P. (2007). Community response grids: E-government, social networks, and effective emergency management. Telecommunications Policy, 31(10–11), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.07.008

Keim, M. E., & Noji, E. (2011). Emergent use of social media: a new age of opportunity for disaster resilience. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 6(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2010.0000

Kongthon, A., Haruechaiyasak, C., Pailai, J., & Kongyoung, S. (2014). The Role of Social Media During a Natural Disaster: A Case Study of the 2011 Thai Flood. In International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (Vol. 11, p. 1440012). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877014400124

Kumar, S., Barbier, G., Ali Abbasi, M. A., & Liu, H. (2011). TweetTracker: An Analysis Tool for Humanitarian and Disaster Relief. In Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 661–662). https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935854

Lindsay, B. R. (2011). Social Media and Disasters: Current Uses, Future Options and Policy Considerations. Congressional Research Service Reports. https://doi.org/R41987

Lobb, A., Mock, N., & Hutchinson, P. L. (2012). Traditional and social media coverage and charitable giving following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 27(4), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X12000908

Lock, R., Cooke, L., & Jackson, T. (2013). Online Social Networking, Order and Disorder. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 11(2), 229–240.

Lundgren, R. E., & McMakin, A. H. (2009). Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks. (L. Hanzo, Ed.) (IV). New Jersey: Wiley.

Mirza, M. (2003). Climate change and extreme weather events: can developing countries adapt? Climate Policy, 3(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-3062(03)00052-4

Miyabe, M., Miura, A., & Aramaki, E. (2012). Use trend analysis of twitter after the great east japan earthquake. In a conference on computer supported cooperative work companion (pp. 175–178). Seattle. https://doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141571

Murthy, D., & Longwell, S. A. (2013). TWITTER AND DISASTERS: The uses of Twitter during the 2010 Pakistan floods. Information Communication and Society, 16(6), 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.696123

Qu, Y., Huang, C., Zhang, P., & Zhang, J. (2011). Microblogging after a major disaster in China. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’11 (p. 25). https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958830

Rive, G., Hare, J., Thomas, J., & Nankivell, K. (2012). Social Media in an Emergency: A Best Practice Guide. Opus. Welington: Wellington Region CDEM Group.

Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., & Matsuo, Y. (2010). Earthquake Shakes Twitter Users: Real-time Event Detection by Social Sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 851–860). https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772777

Shklovski, I., Palen, L., & Sutton, J. (2008). Finding Community Through Information and Communication Technology During Disaster Events. In ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460584

Simon, T., Goldberg, A., Aharonson-Daniel, L., Leykin, D., & Adini, B. (2014). Twitter in the crossfire - The use of social media in the Westgate mall terror attack in Kenya. PLoS ONE, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104136

Takahashi, B., Tandoc, E. C., & Carmichael, C. (2015). Communicating on Twitter during a disaster: An analysis of tweets during Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.020

Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010). Microblogging During Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753486

Xiao, Y., Huang, Q., & Wu, K. (2015). Understanding social media data for disaster management. Natural Hazards, 79(3), 1663–1679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1918-0

Zhu, Y. Q., & Kindarto, A. (2016). A garbage can model of government IT project failures in developing countries: The effects of leadership, decision structure and team competence. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.002



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.34767

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 191 | views : 153

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Indonesian Journal of Geography

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Accredited Journal, Based on Decree of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia Number 30/E/KPT/2018, Vol 50 No 1 the Year 2018 - Vol 54 No 2 the Year 2022

ISSN 2354-9114 (online), ISSN 0024-9521 (print)

Web
Analytics IJG STATISTIC