Reimagining City Identities in Globalisation: A Constructivist Study on City Paradiplomacy

https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.54362

Ario Bimo Utomo(1*)

(1) Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The study of diplomacy has encountered a new turn when the concept of parallel diplomacy, or paradiplomacy, was introduced to the mainstream. The concept itself can be defined as the international agency of sub-national political entities. The logic behind this is that globalisation has given a channel for the local entities to further their interests amidst the prevailing state-centric international system. In the International Relations scholarship, this issue can be viewed through three lenses: realist, liberalist, and constructivist. This article will use constructivism whose idea argues that paradiplomacy contains identity-seeking undertones beneath, where sub-national entities can reimagine their positions in globalisation. The constructivist lens offers more advantage in seeing paradiplomacy beyond activities which are mainly driven by free-trade. This paper attempts to use the constructivist lens of paradiplomacy in exploring how cities can construct their identities in globalisation. There has been a quite extensive literature on constructivist perspective on paradiplomacy, yet many of them are focused on secessionist case studies instead of cities as regular sub-national units which pose no threat to their host states. This article argues that identity creation in city paradiplomacy is possible and particularly essential to cities located in developing countries seeking partnerships with the more developed regions. In doing the research, the author utilises secondary sources through the existing studies on paradiplomacy and city identity in globalisation to keep up with the current state of the art.


Keywords


City; Constructivism; Paradiplomacy; Globalisation

Full Text:

PDF


References

Books

Barber, B.R. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

Boudry, M. (2008). What Social Constructivism Ought to Tell Us About Psychoanalysis (And What This Would Reveal About Itself). Ghent: Ghent University.

Buekens, F. (2006). Freuds Vergissing. De illusies van de psychoanalyse. Leuven: Van Halewyck.

Fierke, K.M. (2013). “Constructivism‟ in Dunne, T. et.al. (eds). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Kamiński, T. (2018). Paradiplomacy–Discourse Analysis and Research Conceptualization. In Pietrasiak, M et.al. Paradiplomacy in Asia. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. (1977). Power and interdependence. London: Longman

Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography: Mapping the future of global civilization. New York: Random House.

Kuznetsov, A.S. (2014). Theory and practice of paradiplomacy: Subnational governments in international affairs. London: Routledge.

Onuf, N.G. (1989). World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations. London: Routledge.

Riyanto, E.A. (2018). Relasionalitas: Filsafat Fondasi Interpretasi Aku, Teks, Liyan, Fenomen. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Schiavon, J.A. (2018). Comparative Paradiplomacy. London: Routledge.

Tavares, R. (2016). Paradiplomacy: Cities and states as global players. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van der Pluijm, R. and Melissen, J. (2007). City diplomacy: the expanding role of cities in international politics. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations' Clingendael'.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Journal Article (retrieved online, with DOI)

Herrschel, T. and Newman, P. (2017). Cities as international actors. London: Springer. doi, 10, pp.978-1.

Journal Article (retrieved online, without DOI or page numbers)

Bell, D. (1989). ‘The world and the United States in 2013’. Daedalus, 116(3), 1–31.

Cornago, N. (2010). On the normalization of sub-state diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(1-2), pp.11-36.

Curtis, S. (2016). Cities and global governance: State failure or a new global order?. Millennium, 44(3), pp.455-477.

Duchacek, I.D. (1984). The international dimension of subnational self-government. Publius: the journal of federalism, 14(4), pp.5-31.

Kangas, A. (2017). Global cities, international relations and the fabrication of the world. Global Society, 31(4), pp.531-550.

MacLeod, G., 1998. In what sense a region? Place hybridity, symbolic shape, and institutional formation in (post-) modern Scotland. Political geography, 17(7), pp.833-863.

McNeill, D. (2001). Barcelona as imagined community: Pasqual Maragall’s spaces of engagement. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(3), 340-352.

Risse-Kappen, T. (1994). Ideas do not float freely: transnational coalitions, domestic structures, and the end of the cold war. International organization, 48(2), pp.185-214.

Robinson, J. (2002). Global and world cities: a view from off the map. International journal of urban and regional research, 26(3), pp.531-554.

Sharafutdinova, G. (2003). Paradiplomacy in the Russian regions: Tatarstan's search for statehood. Europe-Asia Studies, 55(4), pp.613-629.

Shatkin, G. (2007). Global cities of the South: Emerging perspectives on growth and inequality. Cities, 24(1), pp.1-15.

Terre Blanche, M., dan Durrheim, K. (1999). Histories of the present: Social science research in context. Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences, 2, pp.1-17.

Wolff, S. (2007). Paradiplomacy: scope, opportunities and challenges. The Bologna Center Journal of International Affairs, 10(1), pp.141-150.

Zelinsky, W. (1991). The twinning of the world: sister cities in geographic and historical perspective. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(1), pp.1-31.

Working Paper

Lecours, A. (2008). Political issues of paradiplomacy: lessons from the developed world. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael. pp 1-15

Electronic sources

Hobbes, T., (1651). Leviathan. Retreived from https://www.ttu.ee/public/m/mart-murdvee/EconPsy/6/Hobbes_Thomas_1660_The_Leviathan.pdf

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2018). 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. Retrived from https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.54362

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3351 | views : 2742

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.