Thomas Kuhn dan Teori Hubungan Internasional: Realisme sebagai Paradigma

https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.28830

Azwar Asrudin(1*)

(1) The Asrudian Center
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This writing is the writer’s objections against Peter Van Ness’ claim on realist paradigm. In reference to Thomas Kuhn’s paradigm shift, Van Ness argued that realism, as what Kuhn would call “normal science” in international relations theory, is in a crisis because of its inability to explain some anomalies. According to Van Ness, rampant number of states doing security cooperation is enough to call realism is in a crisis as a paradigm. Through several cases on international anarchy, the writer argues that realism is still relevant and worthy to be called a paradigm in Kuhnian category.



Keywords


paradigm; Thomas Kuhn; realism; anarchy; cooperative security

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adian, D.G. (2002) Menyoal Objektivisme Ilmu Pengetahuan: Dari David Hume Sampai Thomas Kuhn. Jakarta: Teraju.

Art, R. (1996) Why Western Europe Needs the US and NATO. Political Science Quarterly, 111 (1).

Asrudin. (2009) Teori Perdamaian Demokrasi dalam Hubungan Internasional. Dalam: Asrudin dan Mirza, J.S.eds. Refleksi Teori Hubungan Internasional: dari Tradisional ke Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Asrudin. (2010) Memahami Visi Perdamaian Abadi Immanuel Kant. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 6 (1).

Asrudin. (2011) Mencermati Politik Luar Negeri Obama di Pasifik. Koran Tempo, 23 November.

Asrudin. (2012) Perang Dingin Baru. Kompas, 9 Mei, hal. 7.

Asrudin. (2013) Merkantilisme Obama. Sinar Harapan, 21 Februari 2013, hal. 4.

Christensen, T.J. (1996) Chinese Realpolitik. Foreign Affairs, 75 (5).

Doyle, M.W. (1983) Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12 (3).

Fukuyama, F. (2003) The End of History and the Last Man. Yogyakarta: Qalam.

Hoffman, S. (1988) Keamanan dalam Zaman Bergolak: Alat-Alat Respon. Dalam: Bertram C.ed. Konflik Dunia Ketiga dan Keamanan Dunia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Huntington, S.P. (1989) No Exit: The Errors of Endism. The National Interest.[Online]. Tersedia dalam: [Diakses 5 Maret 2007].

Huntington, S.P. (1993) If Not Civilizations, What?. Foreign Affairs, 72 (5).

Keohane, R. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kreisler, H. (2002) Conversations with John J. Mearsheimer: Through the Realist Lens [Online]. Institute of International Studies, UC Berkeley. Tersedia dalam: [Diakses 10 september 2008].

Kuhn, T.S. (1989) Peran Paradigma Dalam Revolusi Sains. Bandung: Remadja Karya.

Kuntowijoyo. (2008) Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi untuk Aksi. Bandung: Mizan.

Mearsheimer, J.J. (1994/95) The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19 (3).

Mearsheimer, J.J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W Norton.

Mearsheimer, J.J. (2002) Realism, the Real World, and the Academy. Dalam: Brecher M. & Harvey, F.P.eds. Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Morgenthau, H.J. (1985) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfre A. Knopf.

Nye, J. (1990) East Asia Security: The Case for Deep Engagement. Foreign Affairs, 74 (4).

Pareira, A.H. (1999) Negara dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional: Perubahan dan Kesinambungan. Dalam: Pareira, A.H.ed. Perubahan Global dan Perkembangan Studi Hubungan Internasional. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Posen, B. (1993) The Security Dillema and Ethnic Conflict. Survival.

Russia’s National Security Concept [Online]. Tersedia dalam: [Diakses 15 Juni 2010].

Schmidt, B.C. (2013) On the History and Historiography of International Relations. Dalam: Carlsnaes W, Risse T, & Simmons, B.A.eds. Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publications.

Sorensen, G. (2003) Demokrasi dan Demokratisasi: Proses dan Prospek dalam Sebuah Dunia Yang Sedang Berubah. Yogyakarta: CCSS & Pustaka Pelajar.

Van Ness, P. (2014) Thomas Kuhn and International Relations Theory: Realism in Crisis [Online]. Tersedia dalam: [Diakses 3 September 2014].

Viotti, P.R. & Mark V.K. (1999) International Relation Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. Boston and London, Ally and Bacon.

Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: Mcgraw Hill.

Wight, C. (2013) Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations. Dalam: Walter C, Thomas R, & Beth A.S.eds. Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publications.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.28830

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 17956 | views : 225207

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats