* Corresponding Author
Decolonizing Diplomacy: A Systematic Review of Southeast Asian Countries' Diplomacy Strategies
https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.103582 Faris Rahmadian(1*), Otto Hospes(2), Katrien Termeer(3)
(1) Wageningen University & Research
(2) Wageningen University & Research
(3) Wageningen University & Research
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Diplomacy has long played a pivotal role in shaping international relations, yet much of the scholarly literature remains Western-centric, often overlooking the rich traditions and histories of non-Western countries. A key yet frequently neglected moment was the 1955 Bandung Conference, where newly independent Asian and African nations asserted their agency on global stage. Championing non-alignment and solidarity, the conference demonstrated that formerly colonized and marginalized people could articulate and define their own approaches to international relations. This paper takes 1955 as a starting point and addresses these gaps by conducting the first-ever systematic literature review of diplomacy strategies in Southeast Asian (SEA) countries. A total of 92 articles were analyzed using the theory of ideational power, alongside an examination of domestic and international factors shaping these strategies. Taken together, SEA countries employ diverse diplomatic strategies, often favoring informal approaches that emphasize neutrality, foster warm sentiments, and create positive atmospheres. At times, they adopt assertive strategies, such as dismissing opposing ideas or referencing historical events to strengthen their position. Another feature of SEA diplomacy is its strategic positioning among global powers and regional organizations, consistently leveraging their stance. These strategies are shaped by a combination of factors, including leadership, cultural and religious identity, colonial legacies, international pressures, and the role of ASEAN. Reflecting on Bandung’s ideals and the role of ideas in SEA countries, this paper advocates for decolonizing diplomacy by challenging Western-centric narratives and promoting a more inclusive, historically informed understanding of diplomatic practices that value diverse perspectives and experiences.
Keywords: non-western diplomacy, decolonizing diplomacy, diplomacy strategies, southeast asian diplomacy
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdulgani, R. (1964). Bandung Spirit: Moving on the Tide of History. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Prapantja. Abdulgani, R. (2011). The Bandung connection: Konperensi Asia-Afrika di Bandung tahun 1955. Jakarta: Museum Konferensi Asia-Afrika & Dirjen Diplik Kemenlu RI. Abuza, Z. (2020). Malaysia: Navigating between the United States and China. Asia Policy, 15(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2020.0032 Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2009). Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge. Acharya, A., & Tan, S. S. (2008). Bandung revisited: The legacy of the 1955 Asian-African conference for international order. NUS Press. Agastia, I. G. B. D. (2021). Joko Widodo’s fleeting maritime ambitions: An actor-specific analysis of Indonesia’s Global Maritime Fulcrum. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 8(3), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970211039306 Amurwanti, D. N., Karim, M. F., & Joanita, N. (2021). Settling outside the WTO: The case of the Indonesia-US kretek cigarette trade dispute, 2010–2014. South East Asia Research, 29(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2020.1857657 Anthony, R., Altala, N., & Wan Ahmad Amin Jaffri, W. S. (2019). The Mahathir influence and the changing phases of Malaysia-Syria diplomatic relations. Journal of International Studies, 15, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2019.15.3 Arif, M. (2021). Balancing with Jokowi’s characteristics: A neoclassical realism approach to Indonesia’s foreign and security policies in the South China Sea. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 8(3), 370–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970211041455 Ashley, R., & Shipper, A. W. (2022). The art of Thai diplomacy: Parables of alliance. Pacific Affairs, 95(2), 227–263. https://doi.org/10.5509/2022952227 Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. NYU Press. Beier, J. (2009). Indigenous diplomacies. Springer. Bennett, C. (2021). Cambodia 2018–2021: From democracy to autocracy. Asia Maior/Asia Maior, XXXII. https://doi.org/10.52056/9791254690994/09 Beltran, T. L. (1988). The evolution of Philippine-Soviet diplomatic and trade relations. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 10(2), 144–162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25798000 Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press. Bunthorn, K. (2022). Small state dilemma: Cambodia between the ASEAN and China in the Indo-Pacific context. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 8(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.47305/jlia2281116b Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. Macmillan. Cai, Y. (2013). The art of Museum diplomacy: The Singapore–France cultural collaboration in perspective. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 26(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9122-7 Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2015). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534 Case, W. (1996). Brunei Darussalam in 1995: New par ty politics and diplomatic presence. Asian Survey, 36(2), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645809 Chan, D. S. W. (2017). Asymmetric bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone Dam controversy: Social opposition akin to David’s stone against Goliath. The Pacific Review, 30(5), 674–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1293714 Chan, S., & Brooke, M. (2019). ‘Gimme diplomacy’: A critical discourse analysis on golf diplomacy between Singapore and the United States. Sport in Society, 22(12), 2161–2178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1567496 Cheow, E. T. (1986). New omnidirectional overtures in Thai foreign policy. Asian Survey, 26(7), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.2307/2644209 Chong, A. (2010). Small state soft power strategies: Virtual enlargement in the cases of the Vatican City State and Singapore. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2010.484048 Cohen, M. I. (2019). Three eras of Indonesian arts diplomacy. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 175(2–3), 253–283. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17502022 Darwis, & Putra, B. A. (2022). Construing Indonesia’s maritime diplomatic strategies against Vietnam’s illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing in the north Natuna sea. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 49(4), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2022.2089524 Dent, C. M. (2002). Reconciling multiple economic multilateralisms: The case of Singapore. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24(1), 146–165. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25798584 Derian, J. D. (1987). Mediating estrangement: A theory for diplomacy. Review of International Studies, 13(2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500113671 De Castro, R. C. (2007). The limits of twenty-first century Chinese soft-power statecraft in Southeast Asia: The case of the Philippines. Issues and Studies, 43(4), 77–116. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2649 De Castro, R. C. (2010). Weakness and gambits in Philippine foreign policy in the twenty-first century. Pacific Affairs, 83(4), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.5509/2010834697 De Castro, R. C. (2016). Twenty-first century Philippines’ policy toward an emergent China: From equi-balancing to strategic balancing. Asian Politics & Policy, 8(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.1224 Dingman, R. (1986). The diplomacy of dependency: The Philippines and peacemaking with Japan, 1945–52. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 17(2), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463400001077 Dinh Tinh, L., & Thu Ngan, V. T. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of Vietnam as a middle power. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(2), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211057569 Doung, C., Kang, W., & Kim, J. (2022). Cambodia’s foreign policy choice during 2010 to 2020: From strategic hedging to bandwagoning. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 20(1), 55–88. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2022.04.20.1.55 Emmers, R., & Le Thu, H. (2020). Vietnam and the search for security leadership in ASEAN. Asian Security, 17(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2020.1769068 Enverga, M. R., & Abalos, K. B. (2022). Philippine anger and American conciliation: Discourse and emotional diplomacy in the 2018 restitution of the Balangiga bells. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2064458 Espena, D. M. D. L. (2022). Choreographing neutrality: Dance in Cambodia’s Cold War diplomacy in Asia, 1953–1970. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 23(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2022.2131106 Fan, H., & Zou, Y. (2019). Burma-China early approach and implications for contemporary bilateral relations. Asian Perspective, 43(3), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2019.0021 Farzana, K. F., & Haq, M. Z. (2019). Malaysia’s political orientation in diplomatic neutrality. Intellectual Discourse, 27(1), 783–798. Retrieved from: https://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/id/article/view/1456/889 Gindarsah, I. (2016). Strategic hedging in Indonesia’s defense diplomacy. Defense & Security Analysis, 32(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2016.1233695 Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (2019). Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Cornell University Press. Ha, A. T., & Le, H. B. (2021). Decoding Vietnam’s multilateral diplomacy. East Asia, 39(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-021-09375-w Ha, H. H. (2018). Vietnam’s bilateral defense diplomacy with major powers. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 30(4), 597–618. Retrieved from https://www.viet-studies.net/kinhte/VNRelMajrPow_KJDA_Dec18.pdf Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). ROSES reporting standards for systematic evidence syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7 Hewison, K. (2017). Thailand: An old relationship renewed. The Pacific Review, 31(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1357653 Hocking, B. (2016). Diplomacy and foreign policy. In C. M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, & P. Sharp (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of diplomacy (pp. 67–78). SAGE Publications. Houlihan, B., & Zheng, J. (2014). Small states: Sport and politics at the margin. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2014.959032 Huijgh, E. (2017). Indonesia's “Intermestic” public diplomacy: Features and future. Politics & Policy, 45(5), 762–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12221 Inkiriwang, F. W. (2021). Multilateral Naval Exercise Komodo: Enhancing Indonesia’s multilateral defense diplomacy? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211008905 James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6 Kencana, A. A. L. (2022). Dance exchange as a vehicle of cultural diplomacy: A case study of Ramayana joint performances of Thailand’s Khon and Indonesia’s Sendratari. Thammasat Review, 25(1), 145–177. Retrieved from https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tureview/article/view/240140 Kishino, H. (2017). Lao wisdom as “Buffer state” in an emerging Mekong regional economy – How a small country behaves among big countries. Asia-Pacific Review, 24(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2017.1407533 Kotlowski, D. J. (2016). The possibilities and limitations of first-lady diplomacy: Imelda Marcos and the Nixon administration. Diplomatic History, 40(2), 327–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/dh/dhu073 Kuik, C. (2013). Making sense of Malaysia's China policy: Asymmetry, proximity, and elite's domestic authority. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 6(4), 429–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pot006 Kuik, C., Ahmad, A. R., & Wong, A. R. (2022). Malaysia and Northeast Asia: What drives small-state forward diplomacy? Issues & Studies, 58(03). https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013251122400033 Lai, Y. M., & Kuik, C. (2020). Structural sources of Malaysia’s South China Sea policy: Power uncertainties and small-state hedging. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1856329 Laksamana, E. A. (2011). Indonesia’s rising regional and global profile: Does size really matter? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 33(2), 157–182. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41288825 Lee, S. T., & Kim, H. S. (2020). Food fight: Gastrodiplomacy and nation branding in Singapore’s UNESCO bid to recognize Hawker culture. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 17(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00166-3 Leng, T. (2016). Small state diplomacy: Cambodia's foreign policy towards Vietnam. The Pacific Review, 30(3), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1239128 Lim, T. W. (2009). The rise of China and India: Geo-political narratives from the Singapore perspective. The Rise of China and India, 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814280341_0007 McGowan, P., & Shapiro, H. B. (1973). Comp study of foreign policy: Survey scientific findings. SAGE Publications. Meerts, P. W. (2015). Diplomatic negotiation: Essence and evolution. The Netherlands: Clingendael Institute. Mignolo, W. D. (2011). Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: On (de)coloniality, border thinking and epistemic disobedience. Postcolonial Studies, 14(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2011.613105 Milner, A. (2019). Long-term themes in Malaysian foreign policy: Hierarchy diplomacy, non-interference and moral balance. Asian Studies Review, 44(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1689229 Myoe, M. A. (2016). The logic of Myanmar’s China policy. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891116637476 Myoe, M. A. (2017). The NLD and Myanmar’s foreign policy: Not new, but different. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36(1), 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600104 Nair, D. (2022). Spooks, goons, ‘intellectuals’: The military–catholic network in the Cold War diplomacy of Suharto’s Indonesia. History and Anthropology, 33(3), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2021.1946051 Neumann, I. B. (2005). To be a diplomat. International Studies Perspectives, 6(1), 72–93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44218353 Neumann, I. B. (2019). Combating euro-centrism in diplomatic studies. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-14401071 Ngeow, C. B., & Jamil, N. S. (2022). Malaysia’s relations with China under Mahathir 2.0: Reaffirming bilateral ties, renegotiating economic collaboration, reasserting security interests. Issues & Studies, 58(02). https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013251122510018 Opondo, S. O. (2010). Decolonizing diplomacy: Reflections on African estrangement and exclusion. Sustainable Diplomacies, 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297159_6 Passeri, A., & Marston, H. (2022). The pendulum of non-alignment: Charting Myanmar's great power diplomacy (2011–2021). Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(2), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034221081858 Phạm, Q. N., & Shilliam, R. (2016). Meanings of Bandung: Postcolonial orders and Decolonial visions. Rowman & Littlefield. Pietrasiak, M., & Pieczara, K. (2019). Vietnam’s diplomacy towards the conflict in the South China Sea and its influence on ASEAN. Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.24411/2618-9453-2019-10035 Pouliot, V., & Cornut, J. (2015). Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715574913 Punyaratabandhu, P., & Swaspitchayaskun, J. (2020). Thailand’s perception and strategy toward China’s BRI expansion: Hedging with cooperating. The Chinese Economy, 54(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2020.1809819 Quinsaat, S. M. (2012). The Philippines waltzes with the big boys: Coalition-building strategy in the WTO. Asian Survey, 52(5), 970–994. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2012.52.5.970 Rattanasengchanh, P. M. (2016). U.S.-Thai public diplomacy: The beginnings of a military-monarchical-anti-communist state, 1957–1963. Journal of American-East Asian Relations, 23(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1163/18765610-02301003 Raymond, G. V. (2020). Strategic culture and Thailand's response to Vietnam's occupation of Cambodia, 1979–1989: A cold war epilogue. Journal of Cold War Studies, 22(1), 4–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/jcws_a_00924 Resos, A. B. (2014). Diplomatic relations between the Republic of the Philippines and the East European Socialist Bloc under President Ferdinand E. Marcos. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 8(3). Retrieved from: https://cejiss.org/diplomatic-relations-between-the-republic-of-the-philippines-and-the-east-european-socialist-bloc-under-president-ferdinand-e-marcos Rogers, A. (2022). Dancers as diplomats? Quiet diplomacy and post‐conflict geopolitics in the 1990 Cambodian national dance company tour to the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 48(2), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12591 Rosyidin, M., & Dir, A. A. B. (2021). Why states do not impose sanctions: Regional norms and Indonesia’s diplomatic approach towards Myanmar on the Rohingya issue. International Politics, 58(5), 738–756. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00264-2 Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage. Sayalath, S. (2015). The rationales for the first joint accounting efforts for US prisoners of war/missing in action in Laos: A Lao perspective. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 37(3), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs37-3f Scalice, J. (2021). Cadre as informal diplomats: Ferdinand Marcos and the Soviet Bloc, 1965–1975. History and Anthropology, 33(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2021.1946053 Shang, P. P. (2021). Myanmar's foreign policy: Shifting legitimacy, shifting strategic culture. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211044481 Sharp, P. (1999). For diplomacy: Representation and the study of International Relations. International Studies Review, 1(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00140 Shimazu, N. (2013). Diplomacy as theatre: Staging the Bandung conference of 1955. Modern Asian Studies, 48(1), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x13000371 Smith, C. Q., & Williams, S. G. (2021). Why Indonesia adopted ‘quiet diplomacy’ over R2P in the Rohingya crisis: The roles of Islamic humanitarianism, civil–military relations, and ASEAN. Global Responsibility to Protect, 13(2–3), 158–185. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984x-13020004 Soong, J. J., & Aung, K. H. (2020). Myanmar’s perception and strategy toward China’s BRI expansion on three major projects development: Hedging strategic framework with state-market-society analysis. The Chinese Economy, 54(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2020.1809815 Suhrki, A. (1971). Smaller-nation diplomacy: Thailand's current dilemmas. Asian Survey, 11(5), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2642980 Szatkowski, T. (2017). From Sihanouk to Pol Pot: Diplomacy, human rights, and relations between the Federal Republic of Germany and Cambodia, 1967–1979. German Yearbook of Contemporary History, 2(1), 25–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/gych.2017.0001 Tadem, T. S. E. (2015). Negotiating North–South dynamics and the Philippine experience in the WTO. The Pacific Review, 29(5), 717–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1040055 Tan, S. S. (2015). Mailed fists and velvet gloves: The relevance of smart power to Singapore’s evolving defence and foreign policy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(3), 332–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.1002909 Teo, A. G., & Koga, K. (2021). Conceptualizing equidistant diplomacy in international relations: The case of Singapore. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 22(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcab011 Thaiprayoon, S., & Smith, R. (2014). Capacity building for global health diplomacy: Thailand’s experience of trade and health. Health Policy and Planning, 30(9), 1118–1128. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu1174 Thang, N. D., & Thao, N. H. (2012). China’s nine dotted lines in the South China Sea: The 2011 exchange of diplomatic notes between the Philippines and China. Ocean Development & International Law, 43(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2012.647490 Thayer, C. A. (2016). Vietnam’s strategy of ‘Cooperating and struggling’ with China over maritime disputes in the South China Sea. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 3(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797016645453 Tinh, L. D., & Long, H. H. (2021). The events of 1978 in Vietnamese diplomacy: Analyses and lessons for today’s small-to-medium sized countries. Asian Affairs, 52(2), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2021.1907980 Tran, T. B., & Sato, Y. (2018). Vietnam's post-cold war hedging strategy: A changing mix of realist and liberal ingredients. Asian Politics & Policy, 10(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12368 Tungkeunkunt, K., & Phuphakdi, K. (2018). Blood is thicker than water: A history of the diplomatic discourse ‘China and Thailand are brothers’. Asian Perspective, 42(4), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2018.0027 Umar, A. R. (2019). Rethinking the legacies of Bandung conference: Global decolonization and the making of modern international order. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(3), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12473 Vu Thi, T. N. (2022). The Mekong issue on ASEAN’s agenda and Vietnam’s middle-power diplomacy. The Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 6(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.54631/vs.2022.61-105007 Wardaya, B. T. (2012). Diplomacy and cultural understanding: Learning from US policy toward Indonesia under Sukarno. International Journal, 67(4), 1051–1061. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42704946 Wright, R. (1995). The color curtain: A report on the Bandung conference. University Press of Mississippi. Yeong, M. (1992). New thinking in Vietnamese foreign policy. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 14(3), 257–268. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25798159
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.103582
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 8
| 
views : 3
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.