Review Literatur Penilaian Rekod di Lembaga Arsip, Universitas, dan Warisan Budaya
Gani Nur Pramudyo(1*), Nina Mayesti(2)
(1) Universitas Indonesia
(2) Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Penilaian berurusan dengan proses memilah dan memberikan nilai kepada rekod serta akuisisi dengan menambah dan menyimpan rekod secara permanen. Terdapat berbagai jenis metodologi penilaian yang dapat diterapkan oleh lembaga seperti pendekatan berbasis nilai, analisis fungsional dan model penilaian makro serta hibridisasi. Penilaian telah mendefinisikan peran dalam fungsi manajemen rekod dan informasi terkini selain penggunaannya untuk memilih bahan untuk pemeliharaan jangka panjang. Penilaian terjadi dalam konteks, bisa sederhana atau kompleks dan mungkin memiliki kekhasan yang berbeda dari satu lembaga. Penelitian ini bertujuan membahas kajian penilaian rekod di lembaga arsip, universitas dan warisan budaya dengan mereview literatur secara mendalam. Penilaian di lembaga berbeda menunjukkan keragaman lokus dan fokus penilaian. Penilaian dapat berfokus pada medium rekod, seperti kertas atau elektronik. Penelitian ke depan dapat membahas penilaian rekod dalam konteks kelembagaan swasta (private sector) dan dapat berfokus pada contoh rekod dan medium yang digunakan. Penggunaan sistem penilaian rekod, implementasi kebijakan dan aspek sosio teknis penilaian rekod.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cocciolo, A. (2016). Email as cultural heritage resource: appraisal solutions from an art museum context. Records Management Journal, 26(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2015-0014
Cook, T. (2005). Macroappraisal in theory and practice: origins, characteristics, and implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science, 5(2–4), 101–161.
Craig, B. (2005). Archival appraisal: theory and practice. Walter de Gruyter.
Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
Fink, A. (2014). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper (4th edition). In SAGE Publications.
Jeurgens, C. (2015). The Right to Know: What, When and for How Long. Appraisal and Selection in the Information Age? Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, 3(2), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2013-0050
Klett, E. (2019). Theory, regulation and practice in Swedish digital records appraisal. Records Management Journal, 29(1–2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2018-0027
Netshakhuma, N. S. (2020). Assessment of the appraisal of records: Case of the University of Witwatersrand and the University of Venda. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2020-0043
Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26).
Yaman, A., Yoganingrum, A., Yaniasih, Y., & Riyanto, S. (2019). Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis Pada Basis Data Pustaka Digital: Tren Riset, Metodologi, Dan Coverage Fields. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 40(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v40i1.481
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/diplomatika.61457
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 5111 | views : 4804Copyright (c) 2021 Diplomatika: Jurnal Kearsipan Terapan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The Diplomatika: Jurnal Kearsipan Terapan with online ISSN: 2598-0009 and print ISSN: 2597-9981 is published by Universitas Gadjah Mada. The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Built on the Public Knowledge Project's OJS 2.4.8.1.