Evaluasi Peraturan Pelayanan Perpustakaan di Perpustakaan Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis UGM
Maryatun Maryatun(1*)
(1) Perpustakaan Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Purpose –The purpose of this study was to identify the reasons for due date book returns, borrowers' attitude when exposed to fines, library efforts to minimize fines and evaluate the effectiveness of fines in the library. Design/methodology/approach – This study used descriptive quantitative and qualitative approach. It was conducted at the Library of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Samples were purposively selected, involving undergraduate and postgraduate students batch 2011, 2012 and 2013 that never got fines and were still active. Findings – Borrowers had some reasons for overdue book returns, such as they forgot renewing the book, the book was booked by another user, they forgot the due date, they had no class to attend, had not finished reading, borrowed in short period of time, as well as other reasons, such as illness, a friend borrowed the book. So the term of the loan for 5 days was considered insufficient for them to read the books. Borrowers had to pay fines directly. If they were not yet able to pay the fines then they would not borrow books. Borrowers knew that overdue books would put other users at a disadvantage. Most of borrowers considered the fine to pay as much as Rp5,000.00 /day/book was high. But a few regarded it low. Borrowers considered that blocking the system was not effective for those who were late paying fines. The most effective effort that could be done in order that the borrower returned the books on time was providing online renewal system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Achmad dkk. (2012). Layanan cinta: Perwujudan layanan prima ++ perpustakaan. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.
Adomi, Esharenana E. (2003). Attitudes of university library users towards overdue fines in Nigeria. Managing Library Finances, Vol. 16 (1): 19-24.
Ahmed, AbdulGaniy Okanla and Nwalo, Kin (2013). Fund allocation as a correlate of sustainability of Departemental Libraries in Nigerian Universities. Library Philosophy and Practice (April 2013): 1-14.
Ajayi, N.A. and Okunlala, A.A. (2005). Students’ perception of fine increases for overdue library books in an academic library. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 37 (4) December 2005: 187-193.
Bundi, Alan (2012). In Australia’s first national year of reading, another reason why library fines are not so fine. Aplis, Vol. 25 (2) June: 55
Davies, Rachel and Sen, Barbara (2014). Overdue books at Leed University Library. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science Vol. 46 (3): 226-242.
Jaya, Wihana Kirana (2014). Inovasi, interaksi, inspirasi. Pidato Dekan Dalam Rangka Dies Natalis ke-59 Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis UGM, 19 September 2014.
Jessop, Lauren and Plato, Terra (2011). To fine or not to fine? Feliciter. Vol. 57 (Issue 2): 71-73.
Jogiyanto HM. (2008). Pedoman survei kuesioner: Mengembangkan kuesioner, mengatasi bias dan meningkatkan respon. Yogyakarta: BPFE
Koontz, Christine and Gubin, Barbara. Edited (2010). IFLA public library service guidelines. The Hague, The Natherlands: IFLA
Martoatmojo, Karmidi (2009). Pelayanan bahan pustaka. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Pearlmutter, Jane and Nelson, Paul (2012). Small public library management. Chicago: American Library Association.
Sulistyo-Basuki (1993). Pengantar ilmu perpustakaan. Jakarta: Gramedia
Sung, Jan S. and Tolppanen, Bradley P. (2013). Do library fines work?: Analysis of the effectiveness of fines on patron’s return behavior at two mid-sized academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 39: 506-511.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.13052
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3096 | views : 3089Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.