Online Submissions
Already have a Username/Password for Al-Adab?
Go to Login
Author Guidelines
Al-Adab published twice a year since 2007 (June and December). Since 2018 this journal began in the online, is a multilingual (Bahasa, English, and Arabic), peer-reviewed journal, and specializes in Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies. The aim is to provide readers with a better understanding of Middle East and Islamic Studies history and present developments through the publication of articles, research reports, and book reviews.
The journal invites scholars and experts working in all disciplines in the Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies. Articles should be original, research-based, unpublished and not under review for possible publication in other journals. All submitted papers are subject to review of the editors, editorial board, and blind reviewers. Submissions that violate our guidelines on formatting or length will be rejected without review.
Articles should be written in Indonesian or English or Arabic. All submission must include 150-250 words abstract and 4-7 keywords. Quotations, passages, and words in local or foreign languages should be translated into Bahasa. Al-Adab accepts only electronic submissions. All manuscripts should be sent in word to: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/aladab/index
General Author Guidelines
All manuscripts must be submitted to Al-Adab Editorial Office by Online Submission at E-Journal portal address: [https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/aladab/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions], where author register as Author and/or offered as Reviewer by online. If authors have any problems on the online submission, please contact Editorial Office at the following email: imamwicaksono@mail.ugm.ac.id
Manuscript Template
Manuscript should be prepared according to the following author guidelines in the PDF article template: Click Here for download
The article that will be submitted in this journal should contain:
Information of article
Title: no more than 16 words;
Author(s) name: is fully writen without any title;
Institution: Affiliation, Country
Correspondence address: institution email address
Abstract : All information about the formatting requirements is contained in this document. Please review it carefully. You may use the document as a template and copy/paste your paper content here – this is probably the easiest option. Several styles have been included in this template to facilitate formatting – you may find it easier to use them instead of formatting each segment differently. Note that it is important to adhere to the requirements exactly, as this will form the camera-ready version that will be used to produce the Proceedings. The limitations on the length of the document are as follows. The abstract should 150 – 250 words and written in English.
Keywords:
4-7 keywords, separate with the semicolon (;) and alphabetical order
Introduction / المقدمة
The introduction contains the purpose of the study and why the study is conducted. The main section of an article should start with an introductory section which provides more details about the paper’s purposes, motivation, research methods and findings. The introduction should be relatively nontechnical, yet clear enough for an informed reader to understand the manuscript’s contribution.
In general, the article in Al-Adab is written in English, Arabic and Indonesian. The article also consists of 1 column, using ”Times New Roman”, font size 12, and space 1,5.
This template is designed to assist the author in preparing manuscript; it is an exact representation of the format expected by the editor. To use this template, please just Save As the MS Word file to the document, then copy and paste the document here. To copy and paste the text to this template document, please use “Special Paste” and choose “Unformated Text”.
All papers submitted to the journal should be written in good English. For the authors that their native language is not English are encouraged to have their paper that is checked grammatically and clarity. English language and copyediting services can be provided by: International Editing and Asia Editing. The work should not have been published or submitted for free publication. The official language of the manuscript to be published in Al-Adab journal is Indonesian, Arabic, and English.
In Introduction, Authors should state the objectives of the work at the end of introduction section. Before the objective, Authors should provide an adequate background, and brief literature survey in order to record the existing solutions / method, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what is the achievement (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper. Avoid a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results.
Method / منهج البحث
Materials and methods should make readers be able to reproduce the experiment. It should be provided sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods that already published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be described. Do not repeat the details of established methods.
Identify Subsections
It is both conventional and expedient to divide the method section into labeled subsections. These usually include a section with descriptions of the participants or subjects and a section describing the procedures used in the study. The latter section often includes description of (a) any experimental manipulations or inter-ventions used and how they were delivered-for example, any mechanical apparatus used to deliver them; (b) sampling procedures and sample size and precision; (c) measurement approaches (including the psychometric properties of the instruments used); and (d) the research design. If the design of the study is complex or the stimuli require detailed description, additional subsections or subheadings that divide the subsections may be warranted to help readers find specific information.
These subsections include the essential information to comprehend and replicate the study. Insufficient detail will make the reader confused ; too much detail will burden the reader with irrelevant information. It should be considered when using appendices and/or a supplemental website for more detailed information.
Participant (Subject) Characteristics
Appropriate identification of research participants is critical to the science and practice of psychology, particularly for generalizing the findings, making comparisons across replications, and using the evidence in research syntheses and secondary data analyses. If humans participated in the study, report the eligibility and exclusion criteria, including any restrictions based on demographic characteristics.
Research Design
Specify the research design in the method section. Were subjects manipulated, or were they observed naturalistically? If multiple conditions were created, how were participants assigned to conditions, through random assignment or some other selection mechanism? Was the study conducted as a between-subjects or a within-subject design?
Result and Discussion / نتائج البحث
Results should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Highlight the differences between the results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.
The discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.
In the discussion, it is the most significance section of the article. Here you get the chance to make your data. Make the discussion corresponding to the results, but do not reiterate the results. Often should begin with a brief summary of the main scientific findings (not experimental results). The following components should be covered in discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what)? Do you provide interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any differences?
After presenting the results, you are in a position to evaluate and interpret their implications, especially with respect to your original hypotheses. Here you will examine, interpret, and qualify the results and draw inferences and conclusions from them. Emphasize any theoretical or practical consequences of the results. (When the discussion is relatively brief and straightforward, some authors prefer to combine it with the Results section, creating a section called Results and Discussion.)
Open the Discussion section with a clear statement of the support or nonsupport for your original hypotheses, distinguished by primary and secondary hypotheses. If hypotheses were not supported, offer post hoc explanations. Similarities and differences between your results and the work of others should be used to contextualize, confirm, and clarify your conclusions. Do not simply reformulate and repeat points already made; each new statement should contribute to your interpretation and to the reader's understanding of the problem.
Your interpretation of the results should take into account (a) sources of potential bias and other threats to internal validity, (b) the imprecision of measures, (c) the overall number of tests or overlap among tests, (d) the effect sizes observed, and (e) other limitations or weaknesses of the study. If an intervention is involved, discuss whether it was successful and the mechanism by which it was intended to work (causal pathways) and/or alternative mechanisms. Also, discuss barriers to implementing the intervention or manipulation as well as the fidelity with which the intervention or manip ulation was implemented in the study, that is, any differences between the manipulation as planned and as implemented.
Acknowledge the limitations of your research, and address alternative explanations of the results. Discuss the generalizability, or external validity, of the findings. This critical analysis should take into account differences between the target population and the accessed sample. For interventions, discuss characteristics that make them more or less applicable to circumstances not included in the study, how and what outcomes were measured (relative to other measures that might have been used), the length of time to measurement (between the end of the intervention and the measurement of outcomes), incentives, compliance rates, and specific settings involved in the study as well as other contextual issues.
End the Discussion section with a reasoned and justifiable commentary on the importance of your findings. This concluding section may be brief or extensive provided that it is tightly reasoned, self-contained, and not overstated. In this section, you might briefly return to a discussion of why the problem is important (as stated in the introduction); what larger issues, those that transcend the particulars of the subfield, might hinge on the findings; and what propositions are confirmed or disconfirmed by the extrapolation of these findings to such overarching issues.
Result and discussion should be presented in the same part, clearly and briefly. Discussion part should contain the benefit of research result, not repeat result part. Result and discussion part can be written in the same part to avoid extensive quotation.
Table 1. Table Title
Conclusion / نتائج البحث
Conclusions should answer the objectives of research. Tells how your work advances the field from the present state of knowledge. Without clear Conclusions, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge the work, and whether or not it merits publication in the journal. Do not repeat the Abstract, or just list experimental results. Provide a clear scientific justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You should also suggest future experiments and/or point out those that are underway.
Acknowledgment/ الشكر والتنويه
Acknowledgment is addressed to a person and / or groups and also the institution that helps research both in a direct and indirect way.
References / المراجع
(Examples:)
Abdurrahman, Maman, ‘Analisis Kontrastif Klausa Verbal Bahasa Arab Dan Bahasa Indonesia Serta Implikasinya Dalam Pengajaran Nahwu’, Adabiyyat, XI (2012)
Amrulloh, Muhammad Afif, ‘Taghyiru Soutiyat Al-Lughah Al-’Arabiyyah Al-Musta’arah Fi Al-Lughah Al-Jawiyyah’, Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 8 (2016)
Arab, S, I M Thoyib, and Hasanatul Hamidah, ‘Interferensi Fonologis Bahasa Arab “Analisis Kontrastif Fonem Bahasa Arab Terhadap Fonem Bahasa Indonesia Pada Mahasiswa Universitas Al Azhar Bukan Jurusan Sastra Arab”’, Jurnal al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humaniora, 4 (2017), 63–71
Darheni, Nani, ‘Analisis Kontrastif Klausa Pasif Bahasa Indonesia Dan Bahasa Sunda’, Sosioteknologi, 19 (2010)
———, ‘Penyerapan Leksikon Asing Dalam Bidang Otomotif Kedalam Bahasa Indonesia’:, Sosioteknologi, 17 (2009)
Eric Kunto Aribowo, ‘Fonologi Dan Ortogtrafi Bahasa Arab’, Seminar Nasional Bulan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 2013, 202–2011
Firdaus, Winci, ‘Kata-Kata Erapan Bahasa Aceh Dari Bahasa Arab: Analisis Morfofonemis’, Sosiohumaniora, 13 (2017), 223 <https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v13i2.5518>
Hanifah, Umi, ‘Improving Students ’ Professionalism in Arranging and Developing RPP through Curriculum Development and Learning Planning Courses’, Jurnal Al Bayan, 2 (2019), 1–24 <https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v11i1.3539>
Kuwing, Aseeyah, ‘Interferensi Fonologis Bahasa Melayu Pattani dalam Berbahasa Indonesia Mahasiswa Thailand di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta’, Mabasan, 11 (2017), 32–44
Lutfi, Khabibi Muhammad, ‘Afiksasi Sebagai Upaya Integrasi Antara Teori Tasrif al-Af’al Klasik dengan Morfologimodern’, Jurnal Islamic Review, 1 (2012), 17–47
Malik, Abdul, ‘Arabisasi Dalam Bahasa Arab (Tinjauan Deskriptif-Historis)’, Adabiyyat, 8 (2009)
Mohd Azidan Abdul Jabbar, ‘Gangguan Bunyi Melayu Dalam Sebutan Arab: Satu Analisis Ringkas’, Pertanika Journal Social, Science and Humanities, 12 (2004), 101–10
Mufarodi, ‘Fonologi Dan Morfologi Bahasa Arab ’Âmiyah Mesir’, Arabiyat, 2 (2015), 192–215
Muhammad Ridwan dan Triyanti Nurul Hidayati, ‘Verba Triliteral Bahasa Arab: Tinjauan Dari Prepektif Morfologi Derivasi Dan Infleksi’, Bahasa & Sastra, 15 (2015)
Penambahan, Pengaruh, Ekstrak Pepaya, dan Ekstrak, ‘Penggantian Tepung Ikan dengan Tepung Kepala Lele dalam Pakan Terhadap Efisiensi Pemanfaatan Pakan dan Pertumbuhan Juvenil Udang Vaname (Litopenaeus Vannamei) Replacement’, Journal of Aquaculture Management and Technology Volume, 3 (2014), 75–83
Rika Astari, Syamsul Hadi, Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo, Suhandano, ‘Pengaruh Budaya Terhadap Istilah Sains Dan Teknologi Dalam Bahasa Arab’, Adabiyyat, XIII (2014)
Safrina Muhammad, ‘Analisis Stilistika Terhadap Surah Al-’Adiyat Ditinjau Dari Aspek Bahasa’, Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah, 10 (2013)
Subiyanto, Agus, ‘Proses Fonologis Bahasa Jawa: Kajian Teori Optimalitas’, Bahasa dan Seni, 2010, 154–65
Sundasewu, Rama Ulun, ‘Analisis Kontrastif Perubahan Fonem Pada Proses Reduplikasi dalam Bahasa Jepang Dan Bahasa Indonesia : Kajian Morfofonemik’, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2 (2015)
Ubaidillah, Ismail, ‘Kata Serapan Bahasa Asing Dalam Al-Qur’an Dalam Pemikiran At-Thobari’, Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 8 (2013)
Note:
- Reference should be written according to the format of reference. Articles are required to use reference management (Mendeley, Zotero, and Endnote).
- The article is research-based or thought-based in Arabic linguistics and Arabic teachings which is not published elsewhere either in print or online. The manuscript should be typed in Word document with Times New Roman sized 12, 1.5 space, on A4 sized paper. Margin right-top-left-bottom: 2,2-3-3,6-2,6 cm.
- 70% of primary referrals are at least 20 journals (15 national journals, 5 international scopus / Thomson / clarivate indexed international journals) which published not more than 5 years. Primary references can be from; journals, proceedings, research reports, patents, standards, historical documents, research books, etc. 20% secondary literature (internet, books) published not more than 10 years.
- Arabic written guideline: The Arabic manuscript should be typed in Sakkal Majalla with font size 18, 1.5 space, on A4 sized paper.
Reviewing of manuscripts
Every submitted paper is independently reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers. Decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. If two or more reviewers consider a manuscript unsuitable for publication in this journal, a statement explaining the basis for the decision will be sent to the authors within three months of the submission date.
Revision of manuscripts
Manuscripts sent back to the authors for revision should be returned to the editor without delay. Revised manuscripts can be sent to editorial office through the Online Submission Interface [https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/aladab/index]. The revised manuscripts returned later than three months will be considered as new submissions.
Editorial Office of Al-Adab All correspondences should be sent to the following Editorial Office:
Imam Wicaksono (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Al-Adab Arabic Literature Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jalan Sosiohumaniora, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281
Email: imamwicaksono@ugm.ac.id
Guideline for Online Submission
Author should first register as Author and/or is offered as Reviewer through the following address: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/aladab/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
Author should fulfil the form as detail as possible where the star marked form must be entered. After all form textbox was filled, Author clicks on “Register” button to proceed the registration. Therefore, Author is brought to online author submission interface where Author should click on “New Submission”. In the Start a New Submission section, click on “’Click Here’: to go to step one of the five-step submission process”. The following are five steps in online submission process:
Step 1
Starting the Submission: Select the appropriate section of journal, i.e. Original Research Articles, Review Article, or Short Communication. Thus, author must check-mark on the submission checklists.
Step 2
Uploading the Submission: To upload a manuscript to this journal, click Browse on the Upload submission file item and choose the manuscript document file to be submitted, then click Upload button.
Step 3
Entering Submission’s Metadata: In this step, detail authors metadata should be entered including marked corresponding author. After that, manuscript title and abstract must be uploaded by copying the text and paste in the textbox including keywords.
Step 4
Uploading Supplementary Files: Supplementary file should be uploaded including Covering/Submission Letter, and Signed Copyright Transfer Agreement Form. Therefore, click on Browse button, choose the files, and then click on Upload button.
Step 5
Confirming the Submission: Author should final check the uploaded manuscript documents in this step. To submit the manuscript to Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, click Finish Submission button after the documents is true. The corresponding author or the principal contact will receive an acknowledgement by email and will be able to view the submission’s progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web address site.
After this submission, Authors who submit the manuscript will get a confirmation email about the submission. Therefore, Authors are able to track their submission status at anytime by logging in to the online submission interface. The submission tracking includes status of manuscript review and editorial process.
User Rights All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
- Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
- If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.