MASIHKAH EASE OF USE ITU RELEVAN DALAM PENERIMAAN TEKNOLOGI BAGI PARA PENGGUNA SISTEM INFORMASI (Pengujian ini dengan menggunakan moderasi)

https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v1i3.59398

Budi Kueniawan(1*)

(1) Maksi FEb UGM
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Penelitian ini mempunyai tujuan untuk mengetahui masihkah ease of use itu relevan dalam penerimaan teknologi bagi para pengguna sistem informasi. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah para pengguna sistem informasi di Indonesia. Data diperoleh dengan cara menyebar kuesioner secara online melalui email dan sosial media. Jumlah responden yang mengisi kuesioner adalah 272, dan yang memenuhi kriteria adalah 261 responden. Kemudian responden juga dikelompokkan menjadi 4 kelompok yaitu kelompok yahoo, gmail, instansi atau perusahaan, dan lainnya. Kuesioner diuji dengan uji reliabilitas dan uji validitas, selanjutnya dilakukan pengujian asumsi klasik yang meliputi uji normalitas data, uji multikolinieritas, dan uji heteroskedastisitas. Kemudian uji hipotesis dilakukan dengan uji koefisien determinasi, uji signifikansi simultan dan uji signifikansi parameter individu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan ease of use atau variabel kemudahan penggunaan tidak memoderasi pengaruh pemanfaatan sistem informasi terhadap kinerja individu, sehingga ease of use bukan variabel moderasi. Dengan demikian ease of use itu tidak relevan dalam penerimaan teknologi bagi para pengguna sistem informasi.

Keywords


Abis, Abisugm, Abismaksi, Maksi, Maksiugm, Feb, Febugm, ugm, ease of use atau kemudahan penggunaan, pemanfaatan sistem informasi, kinerja individu

Full Text:

PDF


References

Agustiani, N.H., “Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi Akademik Terpadu (Sikadu) Terhadap Kinerja Individual Dengan Kemudahan Penggunaan Sebagai Variabel Moderating,” Studi Empiris pada Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2010.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp. 179–211.Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683.Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd. Edition). Milton-Keynes, England: Open University Press / McGraw- Hill.Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Akbar, S., “Pengaruh Faktor Task-Technology Fit Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan,” Tesis Program Magister Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2010.Amoroso D and P.h. Cheney. 1991. “Tesiting a Causal Model of End User Aplication Effectiveness.” Journal of Management Information System, pp 63-89Bodnar, George H. and William S. Hopwood. 1998. Accounting Information System. 7th edition. Upper Saddle River-New Jersey:Prentice-Hall International, Inc.Cerullo, M.J. 1980, “Information Success Factors”, Journal of System Management 31 December. Pp. 10-19.Cheney P., R. Mann and D. Amoroso, 1980. “Organizational Factors Affecting The Success of End User Computing”, Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 3. Pp. 65-80.Chidambaran, L. and Jones .B. 1993. “Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support an Group perceptions and performance : A Comparison ofCooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S., Business Research Methods, international edition, McGraw Hill, 2011Davis, F.D., 1989, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of16Use, and Acceptance of Information System Tecnology,MIS Quarterly,Vol.13. No.3, pp.319-339.Davis, F.D. (1989), "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; Warshaw, P. R. (1989), "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models", Management Science 35: 982–1003Davis, Fred D.1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Computer Technology. “, MIS Quertely, September 1989Davis, Fred D; Bagozi, R.P; and Warsaw, P.R. 1989. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology : A Comparison of Two Theoritical Models.”, Management Sciences, August 1989Delone, W.H. and McLean, ER.1992. “Information System Success ; The Quest For The Dependent Variable.” Information System Research, March 1992DeLone, William H. , McLean, Ephraim R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success : A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information System Vol. 19 No. 4 pp. 9 – 30.Devaraj S. and Kohli.R. 2003. “Performance Impacts of Information Technology : Is Actual Usage The Missing Link ?.“ Management Science. Pp. 273 – 289.Diana P.M. 2001. “Studi Empiris Tentang Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pemanfaatan Personal Computing dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Akuntansi.” Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan, MAKSI UGM.Face to Face and Dispersed Meetings.“ Management Informations Systems, 17 : 4 (December) : 465 – 492.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).Gelderman, M. 1998. “The Relation Between User Satisfaction, Usage ofInformation Systems, and Performance.”, Information and Management, 34, pp. 11-18.Goodhue, D.L. 1995. “Understanding User Evaluation of Information Systems.”, Management Sciences. December 1995.Goodhue, D.L.; Thompson, R.L, 1995. “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance.” MIS Quarterly (19:2), pp.213-236Goodhue, D.L., 1995, “Understanding User Evaluation of Information17Systems”, Management Science, Vol. 41 No. 12, Hal. 1827-1844.Hair, J.F. Amderson, R.L. Tatham R.L and Black, W.C, 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Fifth Edition, New Jresey : Prentice Hall Inc.Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L. (1995), Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly 19.2, 213-236.Goodhue, D.L., “Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems”, Decision Sciences, 1998, 29, 1, 105-138.Goodhue, D.L., “Understanding user evaluations of information systems”, Management Science, 1995, 41, 12, 1827-1844.Handayani, R., “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi Dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi,” Tesis Program Pascasarjana Program Studi Magister Sains Akuntansi Universitas Diponegoro, 2005.Indriantoro, Nur dan Bambang Supomo. 2002. “Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis”. BPFE, Yogyakarta.Iqbaria M ; Zinatelli N ; Cragg p ; Cavaye A. 1997. “A Personal Computing Acceptance Factor on Small Firms : A Struktural Equation Model.” MIS Quarterly, 21,3, pp. 279-302Jin, Tjhai Fung. 2002. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kinerja Akuntan Publik”. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. 2002.Jogiyanto, H.M., Sistem Teknologi Informasi, Penerbit Andi, 2009.Jogiyanto, H.M., Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan, Penerbit Andi, 2007.Jogiyanto, H.M., Model Kesuksesan Sistem Teknologi Informasi, Penerbit Andi, 2007.Jogiyanto. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis: Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman-pengalaman. Cetakan pertama. Yogyakarta: BPFE.Jogiyanto. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Sistem Informasi. CV Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.Jonathan Sarwono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif. Graha Ilmu. YogyakartaJumaili, Salman, 2005, “Kepercayaan Terhadap Teknologi Sistem Informasi Baru Dalam Evaluasi Kinerja Individual”, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 8, Hal. 722-735.Jurnali. 2002., ”Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Kesesuaian Tugas-Teknologi dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kinerja Akuntan Publik.” Jurnal Ekonomi dan BisnisJurnali, Teddy dan Bambang Supomo. 2002. “Pengaruh Faktor Kesesuaian Tugas-Teknologi dan Pemanfaatan TI Terhadap Kinerja18Akuntan Publik”. JRAI,Vol.5, No.2, Mei 2002.Karimi, Jahangir; Gupta, Yash P; and Somers Toni M,.2004. ”Impact of Environmental Uncertainty and Task Characteristics on User Satisfaction With Data.” Information System Research , June 2004.pp.175-193.Lazuardi, D., “Analisis Kesesuaian Tugas-Teknologi, Kemampuan-Sendiri Computer Dan Dukungan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai,” Tesis Program Magister Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2011.Maharsi, S . 2000. “Pengaruh Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Bidang Akuntansi Manajemen.” Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Vol. 2, No. 2, 127 – 137Mc. Leod, Raymond, Jr., 1995, Sistem Informasi Manajemen, PT. Prenhalindo, Jakarta.Michael L. Irick 2008. Task-Technology Fit and Information Systems Effectiveness, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis - Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 9, No. 3, September 2008,.Nur Indrianto dan Bambang Supomo, 1999, Metodologi Penelitian untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen, BPFE. UGM, Yogyakarta.Radiyto, D dan Zulaikha, 2007. “Pengujian Model DeLone and McLean Dalam Pengembangan Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Manajemen (Kajian Sebuah Kasus)”, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X.Romney, Marshall B. and Paul John Steinbart (2000). Accounting Information System. 8th edition. Upper Saddle River-New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International,Inc.Sekaran, Uma, 2006, Metodelogi Penelitian Untuk Bisnis, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.Siscar, Sumit; Turmbow, Joe L; and Bordoloi, Bijov, ”A Framework For Assesing The Relationship Between Information Technology Investment and Firm Performance. ” Journal of Management Information Systems, Spring 2000Straub, D : Limayem: and Karahanna, Evaristo, E 1985. “Measuring System Usage : Implications For Is Theory Testing.“ Management Science, 41,8, 1328 – 1342.Sugiyono, 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R & D. Bandung : Alfabeta.Sumner, M., Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st edition, Pearson Education, Inc., 2005.Sumistar, E.A., “Pengaruh Minat Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi Dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Terhadap Kinerja Individu,” Studi Pada PT. Samator Gas Industri, 2010.Sugeng dan Nur Indriantoro, 1998, “Peran Faktor Kecocokan Tugas-Teknologi Dalam Memperoleh Pengaruh19Positif Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kinerja Individual”, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, Vol. 13. No. 3, Hal 37-56.Sugiyono. 2002. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. CV Alfabeta. BandungSzajna, Bernadette and Rizard W. S. 1993. ”The Effect Of Information System User Expectation on Performance and Perception.”, MIS Quarterly.Torkzadeh. G and Doll. W.J.1999. “ The Development of a Tool for Measuring The Perceived Impact of Information Technology On Work : Omega – The International Journal of Management Science. 27.3 (1999), 327 – 339.Venketsh, V., Moris, M.G., Davis, G.B, and Davis F.D., 2003, “ User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unifed View”, MIS Quertery, Vol. 27, No. 3, September, pp. 425-475.Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F. D. (2000), "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies", Management Science, 46(2): 186–204Venkatesh, V. (2000), "Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model", Information systems research 11 (4), pp. 342–365Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G.; Davis, G. B.; Davis, F. D. (2003), "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view", MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 425–478Wilkinson, J.W., 2000, Accounting and Information System, Fourth Edition, John Willey & Sons Inc., United States New York.Wonnacott, T. H. and Wonnacott, R. J., Introductory Statistics For Business AndEconomics, John Wiley and Sons. Inc., 1990.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v1i3.59398

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 540 | views : 513

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

 

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

2302 - 1500