Optimization for Production Tert-Butyl Oleyl Glycoside Nonioic Surfactant Using Response Surface Methodology


Harsa Pawignya(1*), Tutuk Djoko Kusworo(2), Bambang Pramudono(3)

(1) Department of Chemical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Kampus UndipTembalang, Semarang 50239, Indonesia; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Jl. SWK 104 Condongcatur, Yogyakarta, 55283, Indonesia
(2) Department of Chemical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Kampus UndipTembalang, Semarang 50239, Indonesia
(3) Department of Chemical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Kampus UndipTembalang, Semarang 50239, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


The development of surfactant production process strongly influenced by the potential use of raw materials and products that are environmentally friendly. For raw materials such as surfactants are carbohydrate-based material utilization example, glucose, which is reacted with tert-butanol, to form tert-butyl glycoside (TBG), then TBG can be esterified with oleic acid forming surfactant tert-butyl oleyl glycoside (TBOG). This study aims to obtain the optimum conditions TBOG production process of esterification reactions TBG and oleic acid catalyst the para toluene sulfonic acid using response surface method to reach optimum yield TBOG. The independent variable used is the mole ratio of TBG with oleic acid, percent of the catalyst and a temperature. Optimization results obtained optimum conditions of mole ratios of 1: 4.096; 2.33 percent of the catalyst and the temperature of 96.04 °C with a TBOG yield of 92.46%, with a TBOG content of 91.72 %. Based on the HLB value of the surfactant TBOG is 3.87, then these surfactants can be used as an emulsifier of water-in-oil.

Full Text:



  1. Ware, A.M., Waghmare, J.T., and Momin, S.A. (2007). Alkylpolyglycoside: carbohydrate based surfactant, J. Dispersion. Sci. Technol., 28, 437-444
  2. Schick, M.J. (1987). Nonionic Surfactants, Physical Chemistry, Dekker, New York.
  3. Sela, Y., Garti, N., and Magdassi, S. (1993). Surface activity and emulsification properties of new polyethyleneglycol based nonionic surfactants, J. Dispersion. Sci. Technol. 14, 237-247
  4. Zaijun, L., Rui, Y., Zhongyun, L., and Fushan, Y. (2005). Synthesis of a novel dialkylaryl disulfonate gemini surfactant. J. Surfact. Deterg., 8,337-340
  5. El-Sukkary, M.M., Syed, N.A., Aiad, L., and El-Azab, W.I.M. (2008). Synthesis and characterization of some alkyl polyglycosides surfactants. J. Surfact. Deterg., 11, 129-137.
  6. Hill, K., and Rhode, O. (1999) Sugar-based surfactants for consumer products and technical applications. Fett/Lipid., 101, 25-33.
  7. Rosen, M.J. (2004). Surfactants and interfacial phenomena, 3 Ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey.
  8. Hait, S.K., and Moulik, S.P.J. (2001). Determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) ofnonionic surfactants by donor-acceptor interaction with lodine and correlation of CMC with hydrophile-lipophile balance and other parameters of the surfactants. J. Surfact. Deterg. 4, 303-309
  9. Sembiring, H.Br., (2007), Pembuatan surfaktan tert-butil galaktosida melalui reasksi galaktosa dengan tert-butanol, J. Penelitian Mipa, 1, 34-37.
  10. Khuri, A.L., and Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010). Response surface methodology, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 128-149
  11. Zhang, H., Liu, M., Han, S., and Wei, Y. (2013). Optimizing the Extraction of Catechin from Peanut Red Skin Using Response Surface Methodology and its Antioxidant Activity, IERI Procedia, 5, 312-320.
  12. Yemis, O., and Mazza, G. (2012) Optimization of furfural and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural production from wheat straw by a microwave-assisted process, Bioresour. Technol. 109, 215-223
  13. Vuong, Q.V., Golding, J.B., Stathopoulos, C.E., Nguyen, M.H., and Roach, P.D. (2011). Optimizing conditions for the extraction of catechins from green tea using hot water, J. Sep. Sci. 34, 3099-3106.
  14. Raymond, H.M., and C.M. Douglas, M.A. (2016). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 4 Ed, John Wiley & Sons, Canada.
  15. Bezerra, M.A., Santelli, R.E., Oliveira, E.P., Villar, L.S., and Escaleira, L.A. (2008). Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry.Talanta, 76, 5
  16. Raji, N.A., and Oluwole, O.O. (2014). Phase field simulation for recrystallization kinetics of cold-drawn 0.12 wt % C steel in full annealing, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 5, 335-349
  17. Adisalamun, D., Mangunwidjaya, A., Suryani, Sunarti, T.C., and Arkeman, Y. (2012). Process optimization for production of alkyl polyglycosides nonionic surfactant using response surface methodology, J. Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 22, 51-57.
  18. Voung, Q.V., Nguyen, V.T., Thanh, D.T., Bhuyan, D.J., Goldsmith, C.D., Sadeqzadeh, E., Scarlett, C.J., and Bowyer, M.C. (2015). Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction conditions for euphol from the medicinal plant, euphorbia tirucalli, using response surface methodology, Industr. Crops Prod. 63,197-202.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.49537

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1084 | views : 1127


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering  (print ISSN 1655-4418; online ISSN 2655-5409) is published by Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada.