Issue
Date Log
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Upon acceptance of an article, authors transfer copyright to the JIEB as part of a journal publishing agreement, but authors still have the right to share their article for personal use, internal institutional use, and for any use permitted under the CC BY-SA license
Open Access
Articles are freely available to the public without any subscription with permitted reuse. For open access articles, permitted third party (re)use is defined by the following Creative Commons user licenses: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA).
Risk-Based Premiums of Insurance Guarantee Schemes: A Machine-Learning Approach
Corresponding Author(s) : Ananta Dian Pradipta
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business,
Vol 39 No 2 (2024): May
Abstract
Introduction/Main Objectives: This study explores the application of machine-learning techniques to risk-based premium calculations for insurance guarantee schemes within the Indonesian insurance market. This study aims to develop a risk-based premium calculation model using machine-learning techniques in the Indonesian context. Background Problems: A gap exists in determining risk-based premiums for both the life and non-life insurance sectors within the Indonesian insurance market. Identifying and understanding the key variables that significantly influence risk-based capital (RBC) is important, and this research addresses this need. Novelty: This paper is the first to apply machine learning to calculate risk-based premiums in the context of the Indonesian insurance market. The distinction between the life and non-life insurance sectors in terms of the importance of its variables and itsselection of an optimal model further enrich its unique approach. Research Methods: We employed gradient-boosted and decision-tree models to identify key factors impacting risk-based capital. Furthermore, we leveraged clustering techniques to categorize companies into distinct risk tiers, aiming to enable more precise risk-based premium rate calculations. Finding/Results: The findings reveal significant differences between the life and non-life insurance sectors in terms of key variables that impact their risk-based capital. These insights lead to the categorization of insurance companies into distinct risk tiers whichhelps to more accurately calculate risk-based premiums. Conclusion: Machine learning can serve as a powerful tool in refining insurance risk management practices, ultimately benefiting insurers, policyholders, and regulators alike.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Anginer, D., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2018). Bank capital and the structure of the financial system. Journal of Financial Intermedia¬tion, 36(2), 1–15.
- Assa, H., Geffner, M., & Nektarios, M. (2019). The pricing of deposit insurance: The case of the Hellenic deposit insurance fund. Journal of Banking Regulation, 20(2), 152–170.
- Baranoff, E. G. (2004). Risk-Based Capital and Solvency. In The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 29(2), 274–285.
- Baranoff, E. G., & Sager, T. W. (2003). The relations among asset risk, product risk, and capital in the life insurance industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(10), 2081–2100.
- Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.
- Cummins, J. D. (1988). Risk-based premiums for insurance guaranty funds. Journal of Finance, 43(4), 823–839.
- Cummins, J. D., & Sommer, D. W. (1996). Capital and risk in property-liability insurance markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(6), 1069–1092.
- Cummins, J. D., & Weiss, M. A. (2014). Systemic risk and the US insurance sector. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(3), 489–528.
- Duan, J. C., & Yu, M. T. (2005). Fair insurance guaranty premia in the presence of risk-based capital regulations, stochastic interest rate and catastrophe risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(10), 2431–2451.
- Dugas, S., Gao, B., & Nektarios, M. (2003). The pricing of deposit insurance considering bankruptcy costs. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 28(2), 137–150.
- Eling, M., & Pankoke, D. (2014). Basic risk, procyclicality, and systemic risk in the solvency II equity risk module. J Insur Regul, 33(2), 1–39.
- Eling, M., & Schmeiser, H. (2010). Legal and economic issues in completing the EU framework for cross-border compensation of insured bank depositors and policy¬holders. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 18(1), 65–82.
- Eling, M., & Schmit, J. T. (2012). Is there market discipline in the European insurance industry? An analysis of the German insurance market. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 37(3), 460–489.
- Epermanis, K., & Harrington, S. E. (2006). Market discipline in property-liability insurance: evidence from premium growth surrounding changes in financial strength ratings. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(6), 1515–1544.
- Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 4(2), 1189–1232.
- General Insurance Association of Indonesia, & Indonesian Life Insurance Association. (2021). Indonesian Insurance Statistics 2020. Aaui. https://aaui.or.id/statistik-industri
- Grace, M. F., Klein, R. W., & Phillips, R. D. (2002). Insurance company failures: why do they cost so much? The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69(3), 301–328.
- Grace, M. F., Leverty, J. T., Phillips, R. D., & Shimpi, P. (2015). The value of investing in enterprise risk management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82(2), 289–316.
- Han, L., Li, D., Mendoza, J. P., & Ukhov, A. D. (2016). Liquidity creation through efficient M&As: a viable solution for Chinese banks facing regulatory pressure. Journal of Financial Stability, 25 (4), 104–114.
- Harrington, S. E., & Niehaus, G. (2002). Capital structure decisions in the insurance industry: Stocks versus mutuals. Journal of Financial Services Research, 21(2), 145–163.
- Hidajat, T. (2021). Unprotected Insurance: a Case from Jiwasraya. Proceedings of the First International Conference of Econo-mics, 8(2), 1–9.
- Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2(5), 359–366.
- Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006). Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Fore-casting, 22(4), 679–688.
- Kohavi, R. (1995). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2(12), 1137–1143.
- Koijen, R. S., & Yogo, M. (2015). The cost of financial frictions for life insurers. American Economic Review,105(1), 445–475.
- Lee, S. J., Mayers, D., & Smith, C. W. (1997). Guaranty funds and risk-taking: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(1), 3–24.
- Ligon, J. A., & Thistle, P. D. (2005). The formation of mutual insurers in markets with adverse selection. The Journal of Business, 78(2), 529–556.
- McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models. CRC press.
- Natekin, A., & Knoll, A. (2013). Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 7(2), 21–29.
- Nektarios, M. (2010). The future of insurance regulation and supervision in the European Union. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 18(4), 322–336.
- Solichin, R. A. (2021). Legal Protection towards the Beneficiaries of PT Asuransi Jiwasraya Due Payment Defaults of the Jiwasraya Savings Plan: A Critical Review. Unnes Law Journal, 7(2), 257–286.
- Sugiarto, K., Suardi, L., & Suryandaru, S. (2019). Catastrophe insurance market penetration in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Jurnal Manajemen, 23(1), 1–16.
- World Bank. (2021). Insurance penetration, total (% of GDP) - Indonesia. Worldbank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FB.INS.TOTL.GD.ZS?locations=ID
- Yamin, M., Kusumawati, A., & Maulana, T. N. A. (2018). The role of financial literacy and education on the perception of life insurance ownership. Management Science Letters, 8(8), 731–742.