Addressing the Timber Trade Crisis Amidst the Pandemic: ASEAN Strategy within the ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework (ACRF) from a Regime Transformation Perspective
PDF

Keywords

ASEAN
ACRF
Regime Transformation
Liberal Intergovernmentalism

Abstract

This article aims to explore how the ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework (ACRF) is employed by member countries as an exit strategy to address the COVID-19-induced crisis, particularly focusing on the timber trade. The creation of ACRF, specifically in tackling the timber sector crisis, becomes intriguing due to the distinct impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on timber trade between VPA and non-VPA countries. This study delves into elucidating how the ACRF functions as a solution to the timber trade crisis among ASEAN member states. Utilizing a qualitative explanatory research method, the analysis reveals that VPA countries leverage the ACRF as a collaborative framework to rejuvenate the timber industry, considering it an essential tool to enhance their dominance in the ASEAN timber sector. The ACRF, deployed to address the timber trade crisis amid the pandemic, represents a strategic shift in ASEAN's regime transformation. Specifically, ACRF Strategy 3, focusing on Maximizing Intra-ASEAN Market Potential and Wider Economic Integration, particularly point 3.d, eliminating Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) and reducing market-distorting policies is intricately linked to the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA).

https://doi.org/10.22146/jwts.v8i2.11184
PDF

References

Acharya, A. (2009). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order: Second edition. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order: Second Edition

ASEAN Secretariat. (2020). Asean Comprehensive Recovery Framework -- Implementation Plan. ASEAN Secretariat.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2021). ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework: implementation plan. Asean.Org. https://asean.org/book/asean-comprehensive-recovery-framework-implementation-plan/

Asia Pacific Energy. (n.d.). Asean trade in goods agreement. https://policy.asiapacificenergy.org/node/3269

Asian Development Bank. (2022). Southeast Asia Rising From The Pandemic. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/779416/southeast-asia-rising-pandemic.pdf

Asian Development Bank. (2020). Developing Asia Growth to Fall in 2020 on COVID-19 Impact. Asian Development Bank (ADB).

ATIGA. (n.d.). Retrieved December 8, 2023, from https://ftacenter.kemendag.go.id/atiga

Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Merthod. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Reseach Design: Pendekatan, Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (n.d.). OpenDOSM. Retrieved December 7, 2023, from https://open.dosm.gov.my/

ERIA Study Team. (2022). Catalysing Regional Cooperation for Seizing the Opportunities, Rethinking Asia’s Low-Carbon Growth in the Post Covid World: Towards a Net-Zero Economy. Jakarta: ERIA, pp.197-252

EU FLEGT ASIA. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on ASEAN Member States’ timber trade. In. European Forest Institute. Retrieved November 21, 2023, from https://efi.int/sites/default/files/files/flegtredd/EU%20FLEGT%20Asia/Impact%20of%20COVID-19%20on%20ASEAN%20Member%20States%20timber%20trade.pdf

European Forest Institute. (2022). Impact of Covid 19 on ASEAN Member States’ timber trade. In Supporting forest governance and sustainable timber trade in ASEAN. https://efi.int/sites/default/files/files/flegtredd/EU%20FLEGT%20Asia/Impact%20of%20COVID-19%20on%20ASEAN%20Member%20States%20timber%20trade.pdf

FLEGT. (2021). What is a Voluntary Partnership Agreement?. https://flegtvpafacility.org/flegt/.

Giessen, L., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2017). Blocking, attracting, imposing, and aligning: The utility of ASEAN forest and environmental regime policies for strong member states. Land Use Policy, 67, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.012

Ishikawa, K. (2021). The ASEAN Economic Community and ASEAN economic integration. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.1891702

ITTO. (2021). Impacts of pandemic on tropical timber trade could be felt for years, say panellists at Annual Market Discussion. https://www.itto.int/ittc-57/day2/

Jati, A. K., Farizka, A. A., Nasywa, H., & Meliana, W. (2020). ASEAN’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the political and security sector. Journal of ASEAN Dynamics and Beyond, 1(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.20961/aseandynamics.v1i1.46822

Jayant Menon. (2021). Using Regionalism for Globalization: The ASEAN Way. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore.

Jones, D. S. (2020). Covid‐19, history, and humility. Centaurus, 62(2), 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12296

Kaewkamol, Pitakdumrongkit. (2022). Southeast Asia's Economic Future After COVID-19. From https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/southeast-asias-economic-future-after-COVID-19

Kalpana, Giri. (2021). Initial Assessment of the Impact of COVID-19 on Sustainable Forest Management Asia-Pacific States A case study on Thailand and Nepal. United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat. From https://www.un.org/esa/forests/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/COVID-19-SFM-impact-AsiaPacific.pdf

Ke, J. J. (2014). Moving towards ASEAN Economic Community: A New Era Starting from the ATIGA. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 9(9), 415-426. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2014050

Latib, H. A., Ratnasingam, J., Mariapan, M., Othman, K., Amir, M. A., Liat, L. C., Yi, L. Y., Loras, F., Farrokh Payam, S. R., & Jegatheswaran, N. (2022). Malaysian Timber Industry Policy: Achievements, Challenges, and Lessons Learned. BioResources, 17(1), 299-315.

Malaysian Timber Council. (n.d.). Malaysian Timber Council. Malaysian Timber Council. https://mtc.com.my/resources-TradeInfo.php

Malaysian Timber Industry Board (MTIB). (n.d.). Malaysian Timber Industry Board. Malaysian Timber Industry Board (MTIB) Official Portal. Retrieved December 7, 2023, from https://www.mtib.gov.my/en/

Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj017

Moravcsik, Andrew, et al. (1993). Preferences and power in the European Community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach". JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 31, no. 4, 1993, p. 473-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00477.x

Nikkei Asia. (2022). Indonesia's economy bounced back in 2021 with 3.69% growth. From https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Indonesia-s-economy-bounced-back-in-2021-with-3.69-growth

Pryor, J M. (2013, January 1). State Preferences and Institution Evolution: From Security to Economic Interests. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2308830

Ratnasingam, J., Khoo, A., Jegathesan, N., Wei, L. C., Latib, H. A., Thanasegaran, G., Liat, L. C., Yi, L. Y., Othman, K., & Amir, M. o. A. (2020). How are Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia’s Furniture Industry Coping with COVID-19 Pandemic? Early Evidences from a Survey and Recommendations for Policymakers. BioResources, 15(3).

Ravenhill, J. (2016). the political economy of an “asian” mega-fta. Asian Survey, 56(6), 1077-1100. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2016.56.6.1077

Schimmelfennig. (2010). Liberal Intergovernmentalisme and The Euro Zone Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, forthcoming.

The World Bank. (2023). Household Welfare Monitoring in the Lao PDR. From https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/lao/brief/monitoring-the-impact-of-COVID-19-in-lao-pdr

Vietnam News. (2021). Wood enterprises implementing '3 on-site' ask for less public pressure. From https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/999760/wood-enterprises-implementing-3-on-site-ask-for-less-public-pressure.htm

Wang, Z., & Sun, Z. (2020). From globalization to regionalization: The United states, china, and the post-covid-19 world economic order. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 26(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09706-3

Xu, Z., Adel Elomri, Kerbache, L., & El Omri, A. (2020). Impacts of Covid 19 on Global Supply Chains : Facts and Perspectives. IEE Engineering Management , 48(3), 160. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1109/EMR.2020.3018420

Yosefi Suryandari, E., Djaenudin, D., Indartik, I., & Alviya, I. (2018). TRADE LIBERALIZATION AND INDONESIA’S TRADE PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER PRODUCTS IN ASEAN MARKET. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 15(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2018.15.3.225-239

Young, O. R. (1982). Regime dynamics: The rise and fall of international regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2706523

Young, Oran, et al. (1982). Regime dynamics: the rise and fall of international regimes". International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, 1982, p. 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300018956

Yu, Z., Razzaq, A., Rehman, A., Shah, A., Jameel, K., & Mor, R. S. (2021). Disruption in global supply chain and socio-economic shocks: A lesson from COVID-19 for sustainable production and consumption. Operations Management Research, 15(1–2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00179-y

Zed, Mestika. (2003). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.