Keywords
modal sosial
proses pemberdayaan
How to Cite
Abstract
Disable Motorcycle Indonesia (DMI) merupakan wadah bagi pemotor roda tiga untuk beraktualisasi dan melakukan advokasi hak. Kehadiran komunitas berdampak pada proses pemberdayaan yang terjadi bagi anggotanya. Peluang dan kesempatan untuk beraktualisasi diperoleh para anggota melalui jaringan sosial yang difasilitasi oleh komunitas. Dalam prosesnya, para anggota yang semula kurang berdaya menjadi berdaya berkat modal sosial yang menjadi fondasi pemberdayaan. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Setelah data terkumpul, data kemudian dianalisis dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa proses pemberdayaan DMI dilakukan dengan mengoptimalkan potensi modal sosial yang ada berupa kesamaan nilai, pengalaman dan kepentingan sebagai disabilitas daksa dan pemotor roda tiga. Potensi modal sosial ini kemudian didayagunakan untuk membentuk komunitas secara formal. Pembentukan komunitas ini mempermudah pengorganisasian jaringan sosial yang ada, sehingga modal sosial mampu dimanfaatkan untuk melaksanakan aktivitas komunitas yang berfokus pada pemberdayaan bagi para anggotanya.
Kata kunci: komunitas disabilitas, modal sosial, proses pemberdayaan
Abstract
Disable Motorcycle Indonesia (DMI) is a forum for three-wheeled motorcycle users to actualize and advocate rights. The presence of this community has an impact on the empowerment process that occurs among its members. Members obtain opportunities and chances for actualization through social networks facilitated by the community. In the process, from powerless members becoming empowered, social capital becomes a power base used to go beyond the stages in the empowerment process. The research method used is qualitative research. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation. After the data is collected, the data is analyzed and presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that the DMI empowerment process is conducted by optimizing the potential of social capital in the form of shared values, experiences and interests as disabled people and tricycle motorists. This potential of social capital is then utilized to form a formal community. This community facilitates the organization of existing social networks so that social capital can be used to carry out community activities that focus on empowering its members.
Keywords: disability community, social capital, the empowerment process
References
Adi, I. R. (2008). Intervensi Komunitas Pengembangan Masyarakat Sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan masyarakat . Rajagrafindo Persada. https://www.rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/intervensi-komunitas-pengembangan-masyarakat-sebagai-upaya-pemberdayaan-masyarakat-isbandi-rukminto-adi/
Alsop, R., Bertelsen, M., & Holland, J. (2006). Empowerment in Practice: From Analysis to Implementation. Http://Lst-Iiep.Iiep-Unesco.Org/Cgi-Bin/Wwwi32.Exe/[In=epidoc1.in]/?T2000=023200/(100).
Anastasiou, D., & Kauffman, J. (2011). A Social Constructionist Approach to Disability: Implications for Special Education. Exceptional Children, 77, 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700307
Claridge, Tristam. (2018). What is Bonding Social Capital? https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/what-is-bonding-social-capital/
Claridge, Tristan. (2020a). Current definitions of social capital. https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/current-definitions-of-social-capital/
Claridge, Tristan. (2020b). Shared narratives. https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/shared-narratives/
Clopton, A. W., & Finch, B. L. (2010). Are college students “bowling alone?” Examining the contribution of team identification to the social capital of college students. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33, 377+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A242015763/AONE?u=anon~3c32c274&sid=googleScholar&xid=5d8dffe8
Coopman, S. J. (2003). Communicating Disability: Metaphors of Oppression, Metaphors of Empowerment. Annals of the International Communication Association, 27(1), 337–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679030
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed Pustaka Pelajar. Pustaka Pelajar. https://pustakapelajar.co.id/buku/research-design-pendekatan-kualitatif-kuantitatif-dan-mixed/
Friedman, C., & Owen, A. L. (2017). Defining Disability: Understandings of and Attitudes Towards Ableism and Disability | Disability Studies Quarterly. https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5061/4545
Goestiana, W. (2019). Potret Semangat Disabilitas di Surabaya Menggelar Upacara Kemerdekaan. Kumparan. https://kumparan.com/beritaanaksurabaya/potret-semangat-disabilitas-di-surabaya-menggelar-upacara-kemerdekaan-1rgJuVs7WMF/full
Griffo, G. (2014). Models of disability, ideas of justice, and the challenge of full participation. Modern Italy, 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13532944.2014.910502
Grootaert, G., Narayan, D., Nyhan Jones, V., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Measuring Social Capital : An Integrated Questionnaire. World Bank. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15033
Häuberer, J. (2011). Social Capital Theory: Towards a Methodological Foundation. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92646-9
Hogan, C. (2000). Facilitating empowerment : a handbook for facilitators, trainers and individuals. Biddles Ltd, Guildford and King’s Lynn.
Hopson, J. (2019). Disability as Culture. Multicultural Education, 27, 22. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A618030830/AONE?u=anon~5e70249d&sid=googleScholar&xid=622c0594
Ife, J., & Tesoriero, F. (2008). Community development : alternatif pengembangan masyarakat di era globalisasi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Machalek, R., & Martin, M. W. (2015). Sociobiology and Sociology: A New Synthesis. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 892–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32010-4
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publication.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 119–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
Nario-Redmond, M. R. (2020). Ableism: The causes and consequences of disability prejudice. In Ableism: The causes and consequences of disability prejudice. (pp. xi, 386–xi, 386). Wiley Blackwell.
Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. In What psychotherapists should know about disability. (pp. xvi, 368–xvi, 368). Guilford Press.
Pelling, M., & High, C. (2005). Understanding Adaptation: What Can Social Capital Offer Assessments of Adaptive Capacity? Global Environmental Change, 15, 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.02.001
Pigg, K. (2002). Three Faces of Empowerment: Expanding the Theory of Empowerment in Community Development. Community Development, 33, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330209490145
Sutanto, J. (2013). The Effects of Network Ties on Relational Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Virtual Local Community. Journal of Global Information Management, 21, 42–59. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2013070103
Tirmizi, S. N. A. (2005). The contribution of levels of social capital to community development.
Usman, S. (2018). Modal Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar.