Keywords
perempuan disabilitas
kerentanan ganda
pandemi COVID-19
How to Cite
Abstract
Perbedaan makna kesejahteraan dalam konsep welfare dan well-being telah menciptakan kesenjangan dalam produk kebijakan sosial yang seringkali didominasi oleh aspek objektif-material. Sebagai salah satu upaya dalam memahami konsep kesejahteraan secara utuh, tulisan ini berfokus pada makna kesejahteraan subjektif bagi salah satu kelompok dengan kerentanan ganda, yaitu perempuan penyandang disabilitas dengan kontekstualisasi masa pandemi COVID-19. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan sembilan orang perempuan penyandang disabilitas di KSM Harapan Mulia. Dengan menggunakan konsep kesejahteraan subjektif dan perspektif interseksionalitas sebagai kerangka teoritis, penelitian ini menunjukkan beberapa hasil penting. Pertama, pemaknaan perempuan penyandang disabilitas atas kesejahteraan subjektif berkaitan erat dengan konsekuensinya sebagai perempuan serta penyandang status disabilitas. Kedua, temuan tersebut mendasari temuan lain bahwa kesejahteraan subjektif tidak secara ‘murni’ terbatas pada penilaian internal, melainkan disertai dengan pengaruh-pengaruh yang berasal dari konteks objektif di luar individu yang saling bersilangan.
Kata kunci: kesejahteraan subjektif, perempuan disabilitas, kerentanan ganda, pandemi COVID-19
The distinctive aspect in the meaning of welfare and well-being in its perception has created gaps in social policy products which are often dominated by objective-material aspects. In an attempt to comprehend the concept of welfare and well-being as a whole, this study focuses on the meaning of subjective well-being for one of the groups with multiple vulnerabilities, namely women with disabilities contextualization during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research is conducted through in-depth interviews with nine women with disabilities at KSM HarapanMulia. By applying the concept of subjective well-being and the perspective of intersectionality as a theoretical framework, this study resulted in several main points. First, the perspective of women with disabilities on subjective well-being are closely related to the consequences as women and persons with disability. Second, this result underlies another result that subjective well- being is not 'purely' limited to internal judgments but is accompanied by intersecting influences originating from objective contexts outside the individual.
Keywords: subjective well-being, women with disabilities, multiple vulnerabilities, COVID-19 pandemic
References
Atkinson, S. (2013). Beyond Components of Wellbeing: The Effects of Relational and Situated Assemblage. Topoi, 32(2), pp. 137-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9164-0
Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Material Wealth and Subjective Well-Being. The Science of Subjective Well- Being, pp. 307-322.
Çakar, F. S. (2020). The Role of Social Support in the Relationship between Adolescents' Level of Loss and Grief and Well-Being. International Education Studies, 13(12), pp. 27-40.
Crenshaw, K. (2018). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics [1989]. In Feminist legal theory (pp. 57-80). London: Routledge.
Diener, E. (2009). The Science of Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener (pp. 11-58). New York: Springer.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and Life Satisfaction. Handbook of Positive Psychology, 2, pp. 63-73.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), pp. 276-302
Fakih, M. (2013). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Cohn, M. A. (2008). Positive Emotions. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 777–796). New York: The Guilford Press.
Hajek, A., & König, H. H. (2016). Informal Caregiving and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence of A Population-Based Longitudinal Study of Older Adults in Germany. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17(4), pp. 300-305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.10.015
Husin, L. S. (2020). Subjective Well Being pada Mahasiswi Tunanetra. Psikoislamedia: Jurnal Psikologi, 5(1), pp. 54-65.
Impett, E. A., Gable, S. L., & Peplau, L. A. (2005). Giving Up and Giving In: The Costs and Benefits of Daily Sacrifice in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), pp. 327-344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.327
Jordan, B. (2008). Welfare and Well-Being: Social Value in Public Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
Jue, J., & Ha, J. H. (2022). Art Therapists’ Fear of COVID-19, Subjective Well-Being, and Mindfulness. The Arts in Psychotherapy. pp. 2-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2022.101881
DFAT. (2020). Dampak Ekonomi dan Akses Perlindungan Sosial Selama Krisis COVID-19: Pengalaman Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia. Lembar Kebijakan 1. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/COVID-19-crisis-experiences-people-disabilities- indonesia-id.pdf accessed on 5 September 2021
Sapmaz, F., Yıldırım, M., Topçuoğlu, P., Nalbant, D., & Sızır, U. (2016). Gratitude, Forgiveness and Humility as Predictors of Subjective Well-Being among University Students. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), pp. 38-47.
Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2008). Nostalgia: Past, Present, and Future. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(5), pp. 304-307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8721.2008.00595.x
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2013). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif (Diterjemahkan oleh Muhammad Shodiq dan Imam Muttaqien. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sulemana, I. (2015). The Effect of Fear of Crime And Crime Victimization on Subjective Well-Being in Africa. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), pp. 849-872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0660-4
Tentama, F., Situmorang, N. Z., & Muthmainah. (2021). Subjective Well-being among Women with Disabilities. International Journal of Public Health Science, 10(1), pp. 136-145.
The Library of Economics and Liberty. (n.d.). Wellbeing and Welfare. https://www.econlib.org/library/Topics/College/wellbeingandwelfare.html accessed on 5 September 2021.
Turkdogan, T., & Duru, E. (2012). The Role of Basic Needs Fulfillment in Prediction of Subjective Well-Being among University Students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), pp. 2440-2446.
White, S. C., Gaines Jr, S. O., & Jha, S. (2012). Beyond Subjective Well‐Being: A Critical Review of The Stiglitz Report Approach to Subjective Perspectives on Quality of Life. Journal of International Development, 24(6), pp. 763-776.
Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2006). Nostalgia: Content, Triggers, Functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), pp. 975-993.
Zhang, J., Song, C., & Lan, Y. (2020). Workaholism and Subjective Well-being: Examining a Mediation Model. Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), pp. 32-38.
Zhao, J., Song, F., Chen, Q., Li, M., Wang, Y., & Kong, F. (2018). Linking Shyness to Loneliness in Chinese Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Core Self-Evaluation and Social Support. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, pp. 140-144.