Keywords
actor
corporate social responsibility
dynamics
interest group
institutionalization
corporate social responsibility
dynamics
interest group
institutionalization
How to Cite
Nugroho, B. A., & Damanik, J. (2020). Dinamika Aktor dalam Forum Komunikasi Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan di Kabupaten Tuban. Journal of Social Development Studies, 1(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsds.208
Abstract
The divergent of actors within communicaton forum influence the changing of institution’s characters and escalate the interest contestation. The objective of this study is elucidating the dynamic relations and interaction among actors under the authoritative organization in Tuban district. This article employed qualitative method which uses literatures, documentations, observations, and in-dept interviews. The latest method relies on eleven central informants that represent company, country, and society who have relation with CSR Communication Forum in Tuban. Th result shows that the main actor who initiate the emergence of CSR Communication Forum is country, thus affect the nature of institution which more instructive (top-down) and state-centric. The local government is dominating the forum and other actors use the local regulation to produce dependency of company to country. In addition, shifting of power from regulation based to interest based create institution dilemma, institution disorientation and competition of resources among actors. Although using CSR governance, the political dynamics and institution development have not achieved its optimum result.
References
Aligica, P. D., & Boettke, P. (2011). Institutional Design and Ideas-Driven Social Change: Notes From an Ostromian Perspective. The Good Society, 20(1), 50–66.
Buhmann, K. (2011). Balancing Power Interests in Reflexive Law Public-Private CSR Schemes: The Global Compact and the EU’s Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR. In K. Buhmann, L. Roseberry, & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate Social and Human Rights Responsibilities (pp. 77–107). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Caballero, G., & Soto-Oñate, D. (2015). The Diversity and Rapprochement of Theories of Institutional Change: Original Institutionalism and New Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(4), 947–977.
Carrigan, C., & Coglianese, C. (2011). The Politics of Regulation: From New Institutionalism to New Governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 107–129.
Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337.
Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 77–87.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Đurić, I. (2011). The New Institutionalism(s): A Framework for the Study of Public Policy in Post-conflict and Post-communist Countries. Politička Misao, XLVIII(05), 85–105.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.
Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2014). Critical points of CSR‐related stakeholder dialogue in practice. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 248–257.
Goodin, R. E. (1996). The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310.
Høvring, C. M., Andersen, S. E., & Nielsen, A. E. (2018). Discursive Tensions in CSR Multi-stakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 627–645.
Hwang, H., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Problematizing Actors and Institutions in Institutional Work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 62–66.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996). Toward Consolidated Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 14–33.
Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2011). Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. Management Decision, 49(2), 226–252.
Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.). (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (Eds.). (2002). Theories and methods in political science. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mayers, J. (2005). Stakeholder Power Analysis. London: International Institute for Environemtent and Development.
Meyer, J. W. (2010). World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20.
Nishat, B., Rahman, A. J. M. Z., Mandal, S., & Mahmud, S. (2016). Stakeholder Analysis and Engagement Plan for Sundarban Joint Management Platform. International Water Association.
Nugroho, B. A., & Damanik, J., (2018) Dinamika Aktor dalam Forum Komunikasi CSR di Kabupaten Tuban. Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Ohanyan, A. (2012). Network Institutionalism and NGO Studies. International Studies Perspectives, 13(4), 366–389.
Ostrom, E. (1982). Strategies of Political Inquiry. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Othman, S., Darus, F., & Arshad, R. (2011). The influence of coercive isomorphism on corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(1), 118–135.
Perreault, W. D., & McCarthy, E. J. (2006). Essentials of Marketing: A Global-Managerial Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pope, S., Bromley, P., Lim, A., & Meyer, J. W. (2018). The Pyramid of Nonprofit Responsibility: The Institutionalization of Organizational Responsibility Across Sectors. Voluntas, 29, 1300–1314.
Pope, S., & Meyer, J. W. (2015). The Global Corporate Organization. Management and Organization Review, 11(2), 173–177.
Puskarina, C., Asiah, M., & Madung, O. G. (2015). Mendemokratisasikan Kesejahteraan: Mengelola Akses, Strategi, dan Kapasitas Kontrol Politik. In C. Puskarina, M. Asiah, & O. G. Madung (Eds.), Berebut Kontrol Kesejahteraan: Kasus-kasus Politisasi Demokrasi di Tingkat Lokal (pp. 2–34). Yogyakarta: Penerbit PolGov.
Radaelli, C. M., Dente, B., & Dossi, S. (2012). Recasting Institutionalism: Institutional Analysis and Public Policy. European Political Science, 11, 537–550.
Susetiawan. (2012). Implementasi CSR dalam Arena Civil Society: Antara Idealisme dan Realitas. In Susetiawan (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Komitmen untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (pp. 3–30). Sleman: Azzagrafika.
Zuhro, R. S. (2009). Demokrasi Lokal: Perubahan dan Kesinambungan Nilai-Nilai Budaya Politik Lokal di Jawa Timur, Sumatera Barat, Sulawesi Selatan dan Bali. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Zulkarnain, W. (2013). Dinamika Kelompok. Jakarta: Bumi.
Buhmann, K. (2011). Balancing Power Interests in Reflexive Law Public-Private CSR Schemes: The Global Compact and the EU’s Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR. In K. Buhmann, L. Roseberry, & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate Social and Human Rights Responsibilities (pp. 77–107). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Caballero, G., & Soto-Oñate, D. (2015). The Diversity and Rapprochement of Theories of Institutional Change: Original Institutionalism and New Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(4), 947–977.
Carrigan, C., & Coglianese, C. (2011). The Politics of Regulation: From New Institutionalism to New Governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 107–129.
Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337.
Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 77–87.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Đurić, I. (2011). The New Institutionalism(s): A Framework for the Study of Public Policy in Post-conflict and Post-communist Countries. Politička Misao, XLVIII(05), 85–105.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.
Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2014). Critical points of CSR‐related stakeholder dialogue in practice. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 248–257.
Goodin, R. E. (1996). The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310.
Høvring, C. M., Andersen, S. E., & Nielsen, A. E. (2018). Discursive Tensions in CSR Multi-stakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 627–645.
Hwang, H., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Problematizing Actors and Institutions in Institutional Work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 62–66.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996). Toward Consolidated Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 14–33.
Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2011). Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. Management Decision, 49(2), 226–252.
Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.). (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (Eds.). (2002). Theories and methods in political science. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mayers, J. (2005). Stakeholder Power Analysis. London: International Institute for Environemtent and Development.
Meyer, J. W. (2010). World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20.
Nishat, B., Rahman, A. J. M. Z., Mandal, S., & Mahmud, S. (2016). Stakeholder Analysis and Engagement Plan for Sundarban Joint Management Platform. International Water Association.
Nugroho, B. A., & Damanik, J., (2018) Dinamika Aktor dalam Forum Komunikasi CSR di Kabupaten Tuban. Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Ohanyan, A. (2012). Network Institutionalism and NGO Studies. International Studies Perspectives, 13(4), 366–389.
Ostrom, E. (1982). Strategies of Political Inquiry. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Othman, S., Darus, F., & Arshad, R. (2011). The influence of coercive isomorphism on corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(1), 118–135.
Perreault, W. D., & McCarthy, E. J. (2006). Essentials of Marketing: A Global-Managerial Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pope, S., Bromley, P., Lim, A., & Meyer, J. W. (2018). The Pyramid of Nonprofit Responsibility: The Institutionalization of Organizational Responsibility Across Sectors. Voluntas, 29, 1300–1314.
Pope, S., & Meyer, J. W. (2015). The Global Corporate Organization. Management and Organization Review, 11(2), 173–177.
Puskarina, C., Asiah, M., & Madung, O. G. (2015). Mendemokratisasikan Kesejahteraan: Mengelola Akses, Strategi, dan Kapasitas Kontrol Politik. In C. Puskarina, M. Asiah, & O. G. Madung (Eds.), Berebut Kontrol Kesejahteraan: Kasus-kasus Politisasi Demokrasi di Tingkat Lokal (pp. 2–34). Yogyakarta: Penerbit PolGov.
Radaelli, C. M., Dente, B., & Dossi, S. (2012). Recasting Institutionalism: Institutional Analysis and Public Policy. European Political Science, 11, 537–550.
Susetiawan. (2012). Implementasi CSR dalam Arena Civil Society: Antara Idealisme dan Realitas. In Susetiawan (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Komitmen untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (pp. 3–30). Sleman: Azzagrafika.
Zuhro, R. S. (2009). Demokrasi Lokal: Perubahan dan Kesinambungan Nilai-Nilai Budaya Politik Lokal di Jawa Timur, Sumatera Barat, Sulawesi Selatan dan Bali. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Zulkarnain, W. (2013). Dinamika Kelompok. Jakarta: Bumi.