STRATEGI SURVIVAL KLINIK YOGA DARMA
Abstract
Background: Yoga Darma Clinic, as a non-profit organization, is expected to survive in health services. There is a shift in revenue, where non-profit organizations are becoming more like for-profit organizations – becoming more professional and independent. The number of outpatient and inpatient visits has not reached the target, affecting the amount of income received by the clinic. The total operating expenses of the clinic are still greater than the income, so the Yoga Darma Clinic still receives subsidies from the foundation. Yoga Darma Clinic
is expected to continue to exist in health services and be more independent in its operations. It takes innovation, adaptability to change, excellent service, and competitiveness. Therefore, an appropriate survival strategy is needed for the clinic to survive.
Objective: To determine the right survival strategy for the clinic to survive.
Methods: This research uses the type of research capstone project. The data were obtained through in-depth interviews with the purposive sampling method of sample selection. The data obtained from the interviews were triangulated by examining secondary data from observations and documentation.
Results: This study found that the strength factors (strengths) had a score of 1.32 while the weaknesses (weaknesses) had a score of -1.02. The total IFAS score is 0.3. Furthermore, the opportunity
factors (opportunities) have a score of 1.08, and the threat factors (threats) have a score of -1.20. The total EFAS score is -0.12.
Conclusion: The SWOT analysis conducted by the researcher shows that the clinic is in quadrant II, meaning that the clinic must use a diversification strategy to maximize strengths and overcome existing threats.
References
Trisnantoro, L., 2000. Aspek Strategis Manajemen Rumah Sakit. ANDI, Yogyakarta.
Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M., 2016. Non-profit Organizations Becoming Business-Like: A Systematic Review. Non-
profit Volunt. Sect. Q. 45: 64–86. doi:10.1177/0899764014561796
Dart, R., 2004. Being “business-like” in a non-profit organization: A grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q.
: 290–310. doi:10.1177/0899764004263522
Sanders, M.L., 2015. Being Nonprofit-Like in a Market Economy. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 44: 205–222.
doi:10.1177/0899764013508606
Carmel, E., & Harlock, J., 2008. Instituting the “third sector” as a governable terrain: partnership, procurement
and performance in the UK. Policy Polit. 36: 155–171.
doi:10.1332/030557308783995017
Tomlinson, F., & Schwabenland, C., 2010. Reconciling Competing Discourses of Diversity? The UK Non-Profit Sector Be-
tween Social Justice and the Business Case. Organization 17:
–121. doi:10.1177/1350508409350237
King, D., 2017. Becoming Business-Like: Governing the Nonprofit Professional. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 46: 241–260.
doi:10.1177/0899764016663321
Denison, D.R., & Mishra, A.K., 1995. Theory Org Culture Effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 6: 204–223.
Voss, G.B., & Voss, Z.G., 2000. Strategic Orientation and Firm
Performance in an Artistic Environment. J. Mark. 64: 67–83.
doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.1.67.17993
Zhou, K.Z., & Li, C.B., 2010. How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. J.Bus. Res. 63: 224–231. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.003
Indonesia, 2011. Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 Tentang Badan Penyelenggaraan Jaminan Sosial.
Copyright (c) 2022 Albert Yosua, Susilowati , Ni Luh Putu Eka Putri Andayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.