Maternity Leave and Gender Equality: Comparative Studies of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand

https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.80183

Viola D. Oceanio(1*)

(1) Department of Social Development and Welfare, Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article discusses the implications of maternity leave on gender equality by taking comparative cases in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. This article focuses on three important issues, namely the implementation of maternity leave policies, the funding system for maternity leave policies, and the implications of these policies on gender equality in the workplace. This article uses secondary data from official government documents, and documents from international institutions, such as International Labor Organization, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and related studies. The results of the study show that maternity leave in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand complies with the recommendations of the International Labor Organization conventions 1952 and 2000. The benefits provided by maternity leave accommodate women to work and take care of children. In funding maternity leave, Indonesia and Malaysia use the employer liability scheme, while Thailand uses a combination of employer liability and the social security act. These funding schemes are aimed at employees in the private and informal sectors. To promote gender equality in the workplace, the benefits of maternity leave are influential in this effort. The more companies adopt this family-friendly work environment, the more it encourages enhancing gender equality in the workplace. The study finds women are barely in managerial positions due to their responsibility in the family matter. The discussion of maternity leave in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand cases leads to a better understanding of the implementation of maternity leave in developing countries, for which there is currently a research gap.


Keywords


maternity leave; social security; employee

Full Text:

PDF


References

ADB. 2016. The Social Protection Indicator: Assessing Results for Asia. Asian Development Bank.

Addati, Laura., Cassirer, Naomi., & Gilchrist, Katherine. (2014). Maternity and Paternity at Work : Law and Practice across the World. International Labour Office.

Akgunduz, Y. E., & Plantenga, J. (2013). Labour Market Effects of Parental Leave in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Economics , 37(4), 845–862.

Alon, T., Coskun, S., Doepke, M., Koll, D., & Tertilt, M. (2021). From Mancession to Shecession: Women’s Employment in Regular and Pandemic Recessions. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28632

ASEAN. (2014). Maternity Protection for Female Employees: Laws and Practices in Asean. https://asean.org/wp-content/ uploads/images/2015/August/ASEAN- Labour-Ministerial-Meeting-document/ maternity%2012_3_2014a.pdf

Baer, H. (2021). The Failing Family : Changing Constellations of Gender, Intimacy, and Genre. In German Cinema in the Age of Neoliberalism. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi. org/10.5117/9789463727334_ch05

Bailyn, L. (2011). Redesigning Work for Gender Equity and Work–Personal Life Integration. Community, Work & Family, 14(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13 668803.2010.532660

Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Economic, Monetary, and Financial Development in 2020. https://www.bnm.gov.my/ documents/20124/3026377/emr2020_ en_box1_ social protection.pdf

Barrientos, A. (2010). Social Protection and Poverty. Social and Development Programme Paper 42.

Barsh, J., & Yee, L. (2012). Unlocking the Full Potential of Women at Work.

Baum, C. L., & Ruhm, C. J. (2016). The Effects of Paid Family Leave in California on Labor Market Outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(2), 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/ pam.21894

Borg, A. (2009). The Maternity Leave Debate in Malta. http://www.um.edu.mt/__data/ assets/pdf_file/0006/127707/biennial_ doc_2011_2_pages_per_sheet.pdf

Brewer, J. (2011). Comparative Analysis . In R. Miller & J. Brewer (Eds.), the A-Z of Social Research (pp. 33–34). Sage Publications.

Bucher-Koenen, T., Farbmacher, H., Guber, R., & Vikström, J. (2020). Double Trouble:TheBurdenofChild-rearing and Working on Maternal Mortality. Demography, 57(2), 559–576. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00868-6

Carroll, G., Vilar-Compte, M., Teruel, G., Moncada, M., Aban-Tamayo, D., Werneck, H., de Moraes, R. M., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2022). Estimating the Costs for Implementing a Maternity Leave Cash Transfer Program for Women Employed in the Informal Sector in Brazil and Ghana. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1). https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01606-z

Carter, B., Roelen, K., Enfield, S., & Avis, W. (2019). Social Protection Topic Guide.

Carter, I. (2011). Respect and the Basis of Equality. In Ethics (Vol. 121).

Dearing, H. (2016). Gender Equality in the Division of Work: How to Assess European Leave Policies Regarding Their Compliance with An Ideal Leave Model. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(3), 234–247. https://doi. org/10.1177/0958928716642951

del Rey, E., Kyriacou, A., & Silva, J. I. (2021). Maternity Leave and Female Labor Force Participation: Evidence from 159 countries. Journal of Population Economics, 34(3), 803–824. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00148-020-00806-1

Fallon, K. M., Mazar, A., & Swiss, L. (2017). The Development Benefits of Maternity Leave. World Development, 96, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. worlddev.2017.03.001

Fraser, N. (1994). After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State (Vol. 22, Issue 4). https://www.jstor.org/ stable/192041

Fuentes, A., & Ben-Joseph, E. P. (2022). Medical Care during Pregnancy. Kids Healthy. https://kidshealthy.org/ en/parents/medical-care-during- pregnancy/

Glynn, S. J. (2019). Breadwinning Mothers Continue to be the U.S. Norm. Center for American Progress. Center for American Progress . https:// www.americanprogress.org/article/ breadwinning-mothers-continue-u-s- norm/

Government of Indonesia. (1992). Undang- Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1992 tentang Jaminan Sosial Tenaga Kerja.

Government of Indonesia. (1997). Undang- Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1997 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Government of Indonesia. (2003). Undang- Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. www.hukumonline. comwww.hukumonline.com

Government of Malaysia. (2021). Employment Act 1955 Amended 2021.

Government of Thailand. (1990). Thailand Social Security Act BE 2533 1990.

Government of Thailand. (2019). Labour Protection Act 1998 Amended B.E. 2562 2019.

Gupta, S. (2021). Gendered Breadwinner Norms and Work Decisions. International Growth Centre. https:// www.ideasforindia.in/topics/social- identity/gendered-breadwinner-norms- and-work-decisions.html

Hirschman, C. (2016). Gender, the Status of Women, and Family Structure in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 53(1), 33–50.

Holmemo, C., Acosta, P., George, T., Palacios, R. J., Pinxten, J., & Sen, S. T. S. (2020). Investing in People : Social Protection for Indonesia’s 2045 Vision. . https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ handle/10986/33767

Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2010). When Do Governments Promote Women’s Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1537592709992787

Ida, R. (2001). The Construction of Gender Identity in Indonesia: Between Cultural Norms, Economic Implications, and State Formation. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan, Dan Politik, 21–34. http://journal.unair. ac.id/filerPDF/02-ida.pdf

ILO. (2000). Konvensi Perlindungan Maternitas 2000 Nomor 183. https://www. ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/- --ro-bangkok/---ilo-jakarta/documents/ legaldocument/wcms_149910.pdf

ILO. (2012). Maternity Protection Resource Package: From Aspiration to Reality for All/International Labour Office, Conditions of Work and Employment Programme.

ILO. (2014). Maternity Protection in SMES: An International Review.

ILO. (2016). Women at Work : Trends 2016. ILO.

ILO. (2018). World Social Protection Report 2017–19: Universal social protection to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

ILO. (2021). World Social Protection Report 2020–22: Social Protection at the Crossroads – in Pursuit of a Better Future. ILO.

IWDA (International Women’s Development Agency). (2016). The Double Durben the Impact of Economic Empowerment Initiative on Women’s Workload. https:// iwda.org.au/assets/files/20161207-The- double-burden_digital-002.pdf

arshenas, M., Moghadam, V. M., & Alami, R. (2014). Social Policy after the Arab Spring: States and Social Rights in the MENA Region. World Development, 64, 726–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. worlddev.2014.07.002

Keck, W., & Saraceno, C. (2013). The Impact of Different Social-Policy Frameworks onSocialInequalitiesAmongWomenin the European Union: The Labour-Market Participation of Mothers. International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(3), 297–328.

Koslowski, A., Blum, S., Dobrotic, I., Kaufman, G., & Moss, P. (2021). International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2021. http://ww.leavenetwork.org/lp and r reports

Kowalewska, H., & Vitali, A. (2021). Breadwinning or on the breadline? Female Breadwinners’ Economic Characteristics Across 20 Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(2), 125–142. https://doi. org/10.1177/0958928720971094

Kusmit, K. (2017). Ministry of Labour Supports Paternity Leave. Ministry of Labour. https://www.mol.go.th/en/news/ ministry-of-labour-supports-paternity- leave

Kwegyir-Afful, E., Adu, G., Spelten, E. R., Räsänen, K., & Verbeek, J. (2018). Maternity Leave Duration and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An International Country-Level Comparison. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(8), 798–804. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1403494817745737

Nazir, M. (2005). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.

OECD. (2011). Doing better for Families. OECD.

OECD. (2019). Social Protection System Review of Indonesia. OECD. https://doi. org/10.1787/788e9d71-en

OECD. (2020a). OECD Family Database: PF2.1. Parental Leave Systems. https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/PF2_1_Parental_

leave_systems.pdf

OECD. (2020b). Social Spending Makes up

% of OECD GDP Key Findings. http://

www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm Paek, S. C., Meemon, N., & Wan, T. T. H. (2016). Thailand’s Universal Coverage Scheme and its Impact on Health- Seeking Behavior. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1952. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-

-3665-4

Paitoonpong, S., Chawla, A., & Akkarakul,

N. (2010). Social Protection in Thailand Current State and Challenges. In M. G. Asher, S. Oum, & F. Parulian (Eds.), Social Protection in East Asia – Current State and Challenges (pp. 265–291). ERIA.

Petticrew, M., & Helen R. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide (M. Petticrew & H. Roberts, Eds.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

Ponomareva, E. A. (2017). The Health and Labor Market Effects of Spouse Choice, Maternity Leave and Parental Work. http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/2767

Ragu, D. (2022). Maternity Leave extended from 90 to 98 days. Free Malaysia Today . www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/ nation/2022/03/21/maternity-leave- extended-from-90-to-98-days/

Rossin-Slater, M. (2017). Maternity and Family Leave Policy. http://www.nber. org/papers/w23069

Rummery, K. (2021). Gender Equality and The Governance of Long-Term Care Policy: New Comparative Models and Paradigms. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 37(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2020.16

Rummery, K., Mcangus, C., & Edwards, A. (2021). Childcare and Gender Equality. In What Works in Improving Gender Equality. Bristol University Press. http:// www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1k531m7.7

chaap, J. I., & Shockley, M. (2020). The Glass Ceiling: Is it being Shattered? https://www.subr.edu/assets/subr/ COBJournal/Final-Glass-Ceiling--2020- -E-Journal-of-Bus-Economic-Issues.pdf

Schulze, E., & Gergoric, M. (2015). Maternity, Paternity and Parental Leave: Data Related to Duration and Compensation Rates in European Union.

Sekretariat Kabinet Indonesia. (2016).

Pemerintah of Naikkan Anggaran Perlindungan Sosial Jadi Rp.1.584 Triliun. https://setkab.go.id/Pemerintah- naikkan-anggaran-perlindungan-sosial- jadi-rp-1584-triliun/

Shimillen, A. D., Tan, M. L., Abdur Rahman, Amanina Binti Lnu, Shahrul Natasha Binti Halid, & Weiman Sandig, N. (2019). Breaking Barriers: Toward Better Economic Opportunities for Women in Malaysia. http://bit.ly/WB_blogsMY

Siregar, A. Y. M., Pitriyan, P., Walters, D., Brown, M., Phan, L. T. H., & Mathisen, R. (2019). The Financing Need for Expanded Maternity Protection in Indonesia. International Breastfeeding Journal, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13006-019-0221-1

SSA. (2018). Social Security Programs Throughout the World. https://www. ssa.gov/policy/docs/progdesc/ ssptw/2018-2019/asia/ssptw18asia.pdf

Stewart, K., & Carmen Huerta. (2006).

Reinvesting in Children? Policies fot the Very Young in South Eastern Europe and the CIS (No. 2006–01; Innocenti Working Paper).

Sumarto, M. (2020). Insecurity and Historical Legacies in Welfare Regime Change in Southeast Asia – Insights from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Social Policy and Society, 19(4), 629–643. https://doi. org/10.1017/S1474746420000299

Thevenon, O., & Solaz, A. (2013). Parental Leave and Labour Market Outcomes: Lessons from 40 Years of Policies in OECD Countries.

Thomas, R., Cooper, M., Cardazone, G., Urban, K., Bohrer, A., Long, M., Yee, L., Krivkovich, A., Huang, J., Prince, S., Kumar, A., & Coury, S. (2020). Women in the Workplace.

Tominey, E. (2016). Female Labour Supply and Household Employment Shocks: Maternity Leave as an Insurance Mechanism. European Economic Review, 87, 256–271. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.04.006

Tomita, Y., & Kimura, A. (2021). Financial resource of public social security expenditure, the rule of law, and economic inequality: international comparison of legal origins. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 2997–3014. https://doi.org/10.108 0/1331677X.2020.1865828

UN Women. (2020a). Gender Pay Gaps in

Indonesia. https://asiapasific.unwomen.

org/en/digital-library/publications/20/09/

infograpic-gender-pay-gaps-in-

indonesia UN Women. (2020b). The State of Women’s Economic Empowerment in the Indian Ocean Rim. Country Snapshot: Thailand. https://interactive. unwomen.org/multimedia/infograpic/ economicempowermentindiaocean/en/ thailand.html

UNDP. (2016). Leaving No One Behind. A Social Protection Primer for Practioners. UNESCO. (2022). Country Profile: Education

and Literacy. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. http://uis.unesco.org/en/ country/id

UNICEF. (2017). Gender Equality: Glossary of Terms and Concepts. UNICEF.

UNICEF. (2020). Tempat Kerja Ramah Keluarga: Kebijakan dan Parktik untuk Memajukan Pekerjaan Layak di Rantai Pasok Global. https://www.unicef.org/ indonesia/media/7051/file/Tempat%20 kerja%20ramah%20keluarga.pdf

WEF. (2021). Global Gender Gap Report The Analysis Presented in the Global Gender Gap Report 2021. http://reports. weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021. pdf

White, P. (2016). Social Protection Systems. https://gsdrc.org/professional-dev/ social-protection-systems/

World Bank. (2018). The State of Social Safety Nets.

World Bank. (2021). Towards Social Protection 4.0: An Assessment of Thailand’s Social Protection and Labor Market Systems. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ handle/10986/35695

World Bank. (2022a). Labor Force Participation Rate, Female (% of female population ages 15+). https://data. worldbank.org/indicator/Sl.TFL.CACT. FE.ZS

World Bank. (2022b). Women, Business and the Law 2022. https://openknowled.worldbank.org/handle/10986/36945

Yerkes, M. A., Roeters, A., & Baxter, J.

(2020). Gender differences in the quality of leisure: a cross-national comparison. Community, Work and Family, 23(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/136688 03.2018.1528968

Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. Guilford Publications. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Zin, R. H. M., Lee, H. A., & Abdul-Rahman, S. (2001). Social Protection in Malaysia. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/ iez/01443005.pdf



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.80183

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 4118 | views : 2424

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Populasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Copyright of Jurnal Populasi ISSN 0853-6202 (PRINT), ISSN: 2476-941X (ONLINE).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Populasi Indexed by:

  ROAD  

web
analytics View My Stats