Two-piece hollow bulb obturator after partial maxillectomy on ameloblastoma case

https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.50663

Nova Mayasari(1), Heriyanti Amalia Kusuma(2), Endang Wahyuningtyas(3*)

(1) Prosthodontics Specialist Program, Specialist Education Program of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(2) Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(3) Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Ameloblastoma often occurs in the mandibular area, but 15 - 20% of ameloblastoma originates from the maxilla. Ameloblastoma lesions in the maxilla can be treated with partial maxillectomy, which produces defects that alter speech, swallowing function, and aesthetic. The role of prosthodontics is needed to rehabilitate the patient’s condition by fabricating an obturator that helps reduce the morbidity of patients. The main problem with the rehabilitation of substantial defects in the maxilla is the weight of the prosthesis, resulting in non-retentive prosthesis. The purpose of this case report was to evaluate the post-treatment of the partial maxillectomy in the case of ameloblastoma with the hollow bulb to rehabilitate the functions of mastication, phonetics, swallowing function, and aesthetic functions.
This case report discussed the treatment of a 58-year-old female who undergone partial maxillectomy, has experienced tooth loss in 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 21, 22, and 23, and had an anterior palate defect due to mass retrieval under the Aramany class VI classification. The chosen treatment was the fabrication of an obturator with the twopiece hollow bulb
made of acrylic resin. The results of the obturator insertion are good retention, stabilization,
occlusion, aesthetics, clear phonetic, and the increasing patient’s confidence. The follow-up control after one week showed good retention, stabilization, occlusion, aesthetics, even clearer pronunciation and a good adaptation from the patient. This case report concludes that the two-piece hollow bulb acrylic resin obturator in ameloblastoma case can rehabilitate the maxillary defect post partial maxillectomy to restore masticatory, phonetic, swallowing and aesthetic functions.


Keywords


amelobastoma; hollow bulb; maxillary defect; obturator

Full Text:

PDF


References

1. Jain AR, Philip JM, Pradeep R, Krishnan CJV, Narasimman M. Cast retainer hollow bulb
obturator for a maxillary defect -A case report. IJDSR. 2014; 2 (6): 164-167. doi: 10.12691/
ijdsr-2-6-11

2. Bueno JM, Bueno SM, Romero JP, Atin SB, Redecilla PH, Martin GR. Mandibular
ameloblastoma reconstruction with iliac crest graft and implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir
Bucal. 2007; 12: 73–75. https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/medicorpa/v12n1/16.pdf

3. Vasan V, Balaji P, Latha S, Gupta. Maxillary ameloblastoma: A rare case report. J. Health
Sci Res. 2014; 5(2): 21-24. doi:10.5005/JPJOURNALS-10042-1005

4. Afroz N, Qadri S, Shamim N. Granular cell ameloblastoma of maxilla: Masquerading
as pyogenic granuloma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2015; 6(1): 568–571. doi:10.5005/jpjournals-10037-1038

5. Peric M, Milicic V, Pajtler M, Marjanovic K, Zubcic V, Potential value and disadvantages
of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of ameloblastoma. Coll Antropol. 2012; 36(2):
147–150.

6. McClary AC, West RB, McClary AC, Pollack JR, Fischbein NJ, Holsinger CF, Sunwoo J,
Colevas AD, Sirjani D. Ameloblastoma: A clinical review and trenda in management.
Ear Arch Otorhinolaryngol J. 2015; 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3631-8

7. Curtis TA, Beumer JI. Restoration of acquired hard palate defects: Etiology, disability and
rehabilitation In: Islam MS, Rayhan MA, Hayet SMA. Obturator prosthesis for postmaaxillectomy patients: A review. Rangpur Dent Coll J. 2013; 1(2): 19-22.

8. Wu YL, Schaaf NG. Comparison of weight reduction in different designs of solid and
hollow obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62:214-217. doi: 10.1016/00223913(89)90317-x

9. Tirelli G, Rizzo R, Biasotto M, Di Lenarda R, Argenti B, Gatto A, Bullo F. Obturator
prostheses following palatal resection: clinical cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010; 30:33-39.

10. Gunadi HA, Margo A, Burhan LK, Suryatenggara F. Buku ajar ilmu geligi tiruan sebagian lepasan Jilid 1. Jakarta: Hipokrates; 2013. 88.

11. Gregory RP, Gregory RE, Arthur OR. Prosthodontic principles in the framework design of maxillary obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.017

12. Lakshmi S. Preclinical Manual of Prosthodontics. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2010.
66-68.

13. Suryakant CD, Sneha SM, Dinesh N, Gunjan D, Pushkar G, Ashish DA. Direct investment
method of closed two-piece hollow bulb obturator. Case Rep Dent. 2013; 1-6.
doi:10.1155/2013/326530

14. Yanikoǧtlu N, Denȋzoǧlu S. The effect of different solutions on the bond strength of soft
lining materials to acrylic resin. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25(1): 39-44. doi: 10.4012/dmj.25.39

15. Sapna R, Sakshi G, Mahest V. Hollow bulb one pice maxillary definitive obturator – a
simplified approach. CCD. 2017; 8(1):167170. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_887_16



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.50663

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 669 | views : 568

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Currently, Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia indexed by:

        

 

 

 

 

 

 View My Stats


real
time web analytics