Differences between male and female mandibular length growth according to panoramic radiograph

https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.39164

Azhari Azhari(1), Berty Pramatika(2), Lusi Epsilawati(3*)

(1) Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjajaran, West Java
(2) Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Airlangga, East Java
(3) Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjajaran, West Java
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Evaluation of the mandible was used for age and sex determination in the forensic field and it established the treatment planning in dentistry. The present study aims to determine mandibular length growth on male and female group aged   9-25 years old using panoramic radiograph. The research was conducted using analytical cross-sectional design method. The subject of this research was 412 panoramic radioraphs of patients aged 9-25 years old. It involved a total
samples of 207 males and 205 females. This research was conducted from May to October 2017 in RSGM Padjadjaran University Bandung to meassure the length and height of mandibula from the point in condyleus to mentone. The MannWhitney test results showed a significant difference in mandibular length between men and women and no significant difference between the right and
left mandibular length in men and women. There is a difference between male and female mandibular length growth, in which the increase of growth of mandibular length in female is earlier than that of male. Male mandibular length is greater than female.


Keywords


gender; growth; mandibular length; panoramic radiograph

Full Text:

PDF


References

1. Manna I. Growth development and maturity in children and adolescent: relation to sports and physical activity. American J Sports Sci Med. 2014; 2(5A): 48-50. doi: 10.12691/ajssm-2-5A-11

2. Kumar V, Venkataraghavan K, Krishnan R, Patil K, Munoli K, Karthik S. The relationship between dental age, bone age and chronological age in underweight children. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013; 5(1): S73–79. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.113301

3. Alhadlaq AM, Al-Shayea EI. New method for evaluation of cervical vertebral maturation based on angular measurements. Saudi Med J. 2013; 34(4): 388-394.

4. Subramaniam P, Naidu P. Mandibular dimensional changes and skeletal maturity. Contemp Clin Dent. 2010; 1(4): 218–222. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.76387

5. De Sanctis V, Di Maio S, Soliman AT, Raiola G, Elalaily R5, Millimaggi G. Hand X-ray in pediatric endocrinology: Skeletal age assessment and beyond. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 18(1): S63–S71. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.145076

6. Sachan K, Sharma VP, Tandon P. A correlative study of dental age and skeletal maturation. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22(6): 882· doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.94698

7. Mohite DP, Chaudhary MP, Mohite PM, Patil SP. Age assessment from mandible: comparison of radiographic and histologic methods. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011; 52(2): 659–668.

8. Prekumar S. Textbook of craniofacial growth. New Delhi: Jaypee medical brother publisher; 2011. 15-17

9. Sperber GH, Sperber SM. The Role of Genetics in Craniofacial Biology. Austin Dent Sci. 2016; 1(1): 1004.

10. Madhavan S. Mandibular development and its age change. J Pharm Sci and Research 2014; 6(11): 360-362.

11. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2014.

12. Bordini B, Rosenfeld RL. Normal pubertal development: Part II: Clinical aspects of puberty. Pediatr Rev. 2011; 32(7): 281–292. doi: 10.1542/pir.32-7-281

13. Mellion ZJ, Behrents RG, Johnston LE Jr. The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation. Am J Orthod and Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143(6): 845-854. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019

14. Jeelani W, Fida M, Shaikh A. The duration of pubertal growth peak among three skeletal classes. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21(5): 67-74. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.5.067-074.oar

15. Buschang PH, Jacob HB, Demirjian A. Female adolescent craniofacial growth spurts: real or fiction? Euro J Orthod. 2013; 35(6): 819–825. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs094

16. Shim KS. Pubertal growth and epiphyseal fusion. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 20(1): 8–12. doi: 10.6065/apem.2015.20.1.8

17. Soliman A, Sanctis VD, Elalaily R, Bedair S. Advances in pubertal growth and factors influencing it: Can we increase pubertal growth? Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 18(1): S53–S62. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.145075

18. Poulton AS, Melzer E, Tait PR, Garnett SP, Cowell CT, Baur LA, Clarke S. Growth and pubertal development of adolescent boys on stimulant medication for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Med J Aust. 2013; 198(1): 29-32. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10931

19. Standerwick RG. Analysis of Average Horizontal and Vertical Mandibular Growth Components Relative to the Horizontal Plane as Determined from Cross-sectional Cephalometric Normal Standards. J Dent App. 2014; 1(4): 55-60.

20. Specker BL, Wey HE, Smith EP. Rates of bone loss in young adult males. Int J Clin Rheumtol. 2010; 5(2): 215–228. doi: 10.2217/ijr.10.7

21. Olayemi AB. Assessment and determination of human mandibular and dental arch profiles in subjects with lower third molar impaction in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 1(2): 126-130. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.92775

22. Sharma P, Arora A, Valiathan A. Age changes of jaws and soft tissue profile. Scientific World Journal. 2014; 2014: 301501. doi: 10.1155/2014/301501


23. Subramaniam P, Naidu P. Mandibular dimensional changes and skeletal maturity. Contemp Clin Dent. 2010; 1(4): 218-222. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.76387


24. Generoso R, Sadoco ES, Armond MS, Gameiro GH. Evaluation of mandibular length in subjects with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns using the cervical vertebrae maturation. Braz Oral Res. 2010; 24(1): 46-51. doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242010000100008


25. Marquezin MCS, Andrade ADS, Rossi MD, Gameiro GH, Gaviao MBD, Castelo PM. Maria B, Paula M. Evaluation of sexual dimorphism and the relationship between craniofacial, dental arch and masseter muscle characteristics in mixed dentition. Rev. CEFAC. 2014; 16(4): 1231-1238. doi: 10.1590/1982-021620149613


26. Liu YP, Behrentsb RG, Buschangc PH. Mandibular growth, remodeling, and maturation during infancy and early childhood. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80(1): 97-105. doi: 10.2319/020309-67.1.

27. Lang TF. The bone-muscle relationship in Men and Women. J Osteoporosis. 2011; 2011: 702735. doi: 10.4061/2011/702735

28. Litsas G. Growth hormone and craniofacial tissue: an update. Open Dent J. 2015; 9: 1-8. doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010001


29. Al-Zubair NM. Dental arch asymmetry. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8(2): 224–228. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.130608

30. Agrawal M, Agrawal JA, Nanjannawar L,Fularia S, KagiV. Dentofacial Asymmetries: Challenging Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7(7): 128–131.


31. Gribel BF, Thiesen G, Borges TS, Freitas MPM. Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in skeletal Class I adult patients. J Research Dent. 2014; 2(2): 189–197. doi: 10.19177/jrd.v2e22014189-97

32. Kim EJ, Palomo JM, Kim SS, Lim HJ, Lee KM, Hwang HS. Maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation between mandibular retrusion and prognathism patients. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(6): 988–993. doi: 10.2319/112210-681.1



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.39164

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 7645 | views : 4096

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2019 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 View My Stats


real time web analytics