Physiological maturation stage of cervical vertebrate index in cleft lip/palate and non-cleft lip/palate patients

Wenti Komala; Endah Mardiati; Eky Soeria Soemantri; Isnaniah Malik

doi:10.22146/majkedgiind.28356

Physiological maturation stage of cervical vertebrate index in cleft lip/palate and non-cleft lip/palate patients

https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.28356

Wenti Komala^(1*), Endah Mardiati⁽²⁾, Eky Soeria Soemantri⁽³⁾, Isnaniah Malik⁽⁴⁾

(1) Orthodontic Specialist Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung
(2) Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung
(3) Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung
(4) Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate is one of the most common congenital anomalies. Cleft lip and palate patients encounter growth problems in lip and palate area, although their overall growth and development remains unknown. Cervical vertebral maturation are indicators of physiological maturation used in interceptive treatment and orthognathic surgery. The present study aims to determine physiological maturation stage of cervical vertebrae maturation index in cleft and
non-cleft patients. Lateral cephalogram of 26 cleft patients and 27 non-cleft patients with a range of chronological age from 8-16 years old were involved. The cervical vertebrae maturation were analyzed in six stages of cervical vertebrae maturation method of Hassel and Farman. Data were analyzed using t-test (p≤ 0.05). The result shows that physiological
maturation stage of cervical vertebrae maturation index in cleft and non-cleft patients has no significant difference in stage acceleration (p= 0.38), stage transition (p= 0.41) and deceleration (p= 0.39). Likewise, there is no significant difference in physiological maturation stage of cervical vertebrae maturation index between cleft and non-cleft patients.

Keywords

cleft lip and palate; Hassel and Farman’s method; maturation index

Full Text:

PDF-5

References

1. Vigni A, Anindita P, Paulina. Gambaran maloklusi dengan menggunakan HMAR pada pasien di Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. Jurnal
e-Gigi. 2014. 2: 2.

2. Tanaka SA, Mahabir RC, Jupiter DC, Menesez JM. Updating the epidemiology of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. 2012; 129(3): 511-518.

3. Poonsak P, Godfrey K, Manosudprasit M, Wangsrimongkol T, Leelasinjaroen P. A Comparison of cervical vertebral maturation assessment of skeletal growth stages with
chronological age in thai between cleft lip and palate and non-cleft patients. J Med Assoc
Thai. 2013; 96(4): S9-S18.

4. Wong RW, Alkhal HA, Rabie AB. Use of cervical vertebral maturation to determine
skeletal age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 484-486.

5. Lee J, Nunn J, Wright C. Height and weight achievement in cleft lip and palate. Archives
Disease in Childhood. 1997; 75: 327-329.

6. Ranalli DN, Mazaheri M. Height-Weight growth of cleft children, birth to six years
H.K cooper institute for oral-facial anomalies and communicative disorders. Lancaster,
Pennsylvania. 1975.

7. Sahar F, Eman A. Growth status of Saudi Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate. Saudi Med
J. 2002; 23(7): 823-827.

8. Sun L, Li W. Cervical vertebral maturation of female children with orofacial clefts. The
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2013; 50(5): 535-541.

9. Ross RB, Trotman. Craniofac growth in bilateral cleft lip and palate; age six years to
adulthood. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 261-273.

10. Mardiati E. Indikator maturasi fisiologis untuk perawatan ortodonti interseptif. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah Bandung Dentistry 9. 2012; 315-328.

11. Mardiati E, Soemantry ES, Haroen ER, Thahar B, Sutrisna B. The Relationship determination between menarche and the peak of skeletal maturation using hand wrist and cervical vertebrae index. Dental Journal. 2014; 47(2): 67-71.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.28356