Pengaruh variansi konsentrasi ekstrak kulit batang jambu mete terhadap sitotoksikitas sel fibroblas
H. Harsini(1*), Ahmad Febri(2)
(1) Departemen Ilmu Biomaterial Kedokteran Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Pendidikan Dokter Gigi, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The influence of cashew stembark extract on citotoxicity fibroblast. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of variation in the concentration of cashew stem bark extract as the base material of mouthwash of the cytotoxic effect on fibroblast cells. The material used in this study was cashew stem bark extracted by maceration method using 70% of ethanol. A total of 15 samples were grouped into 5, each of which consisted of 3 samples (ISO 10993-5). Concentrations used were 1.6%, 0.8%, 0.4%, 0.2% and 0.05%. Cytotoxicity test used the MTT method by comparing the optical density (ELISA plate reader) between treated groups with control groups. Cell viability was obtained by comparing the treated groups with control groups. Cell viability data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and LSD. The results showed that cashew stem bark has an anticardia acid. Cytotoxicity test used the mean of fibroblast cell viability due to various cashew stem bark extracts successively from concentrations 1.6%, 0.8%, 0.4%, 0.2% and 0.05% with the mean of 15.35 ± 0.443%, 30.84% ± 1.59, 47.78 ± 8.09%, 65.74% ± 3.20, 74.95 ± 7.26%. ANOVA showed a significant influence of various cashew stem bark on cell viability (p<0,05). The results of LSD showed a significant difference between treated groups except between concentrations 0.95% and 0.2%. In conclusion, Cashew extract have anacardic acid and there was influence on various cashew stem bark extract concentrations on the cytotoxicity of fibroblast cell. The concentration of 2% was not cytotoxic.
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kandungan ekstrak kulit batang jambu mete dan pengaruh variasi konsentrasi terhadap sitotosisitas sel fibroblas. Penelitian ini menggunakan bahan kulit batang jambu mete (Mojolegi) yang diindentifikasi dan diekstrak menggunakan metode maserasi dengan pelarut etanol 70%. Ekstrak diuji kandungannya menggunakan metode KLT (Kromatografi Lapis Tipis). Uji sitotoksikistas menggunakan sampel sejumlah 15 dikelompokkan menjadi 5, masing-masing kelompok 3 (ISO-10993-5). Variasi konsentrasi adalah 1,6%, 0,8%, 0,4%, 0,2% dan 0,05%. Uji sitotoksikitas menggunakan metode MTT dengan cara membandingkan optical density (ELISA plate reader) antar kelompok perlakuan dengan kelompok kontrol. Viabilitas sel didapatkan dengan membandingkan nilai optical density pada kelompok perlakuan dan kelompok kontrol. Data viabilitas sel dianalisis menggunakan ANAVA satu jalur dan LSD. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan rerata ekstrak mengandung senyawa asam anakardat dan asam galat. Uji sitotoksikistas sel fibroblas akibat variasi ekstrak kulit batang jambu mete secara berturut-turut dari konsentrasi 1,6%, 0,8%, 0,4%, 0,2% dan 0,05% dengan rerata sebesar 15,35% ± 0,443, 30,84% ± 1,59, 47,78% ± 8,09, 65,74% ± 3,20, 74,95% ± 7,26. Uji ANAVA menunjukkan adanya pengaruh variasi konsentrasi ekstrak kulit batang jambu mete bermakna terhadap viabilitas sel (p<0,05). Hasil uji LSD menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna (p<0,05) antar kelompok perlakuan, kecuali antara konsentrasi 0,05% dengan konsentrasi 0,2%. Kesimpulan Ekstrak kulit batang jambu mete mengandung asam anakardat dan asam galat dan terdapat pengaruh variasi konsentrasi ekstrak kulit batang jambu mete terhadap sitotoksikitas sel fibroblas. Konsentrasi 0,2% merupakan konsentrasi yang tidak toksis terhadap sel fibroblas secara in vitro.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cawson RA, Odell EW. Cawson’s essentials of oral pathology and oral medicine, 7th ed. Curchill-Livingstone: Edinburgh; 2008. 220 – 224. 2. Powers JM, Sakaguci RL. Craig’s restorativedental materials, Mosby: USA; 2006. 514 – 516, 524 – 527. 3. Harris NO, Christen AG. Primary preventive dentistry, Second Edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; 1997. 157 – 191. 4. Haq MW, Batool M, Ahsan SM, Qureshi NR. Alcohol use in mouthwash and possible oral health concerns. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009; 59(3):186 – 190. 5. Salma. Tujuh keunggulan obat herbal, Majalah Kesehatan. Sumer informasi kesehatan anda; 2010. 6. Kementrian Riset dan Teknologi. Teknologi Tepat Guna (TTG) budidaya pertanian jambu mete. 2005; diakses dari: www.iptek.net.id/ind/warintek/budidaya_ pertanian. php.html, (30/09/12). 7. Akinpelu DA. Antimicrobial activity of Anacardium occidentale bark. Fitoterapia. 2001; 72: 826 – 827. 8. Prihatman K. Jambu mete, tentang budidaya pertanian, sistem informasi manajemen pembangunan di pedesaan, BAPPENAS, 2000, diakses dari: www.warintek.ristek.go.id/ pertanian/jambu_mete, (12/2/2014). 9. Harsini, Sutardja I, Martono S, Sunarintyas S, Sudarsono. Potensi ekstrak jambu mete (Anacardium occidentale Linn.) sebagai bahan obat kumur. Disertasi program studi ilmu kedokteran kedokteran gigi. FKG, UGM; 2014. 10. Tampubolon O. Tumbuhan obat bagi pencinta alam. Jakarta: Penerbit bhatara; 1995. 101 – 102. 11. Hegnauer R. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Stuttgart: Birkhäuser Verlag; 1986. 259 – 260. 12. Pelzar JM, Chan ECS. Dasar-dasar mikrobiologi 2. Jakarta: Penerbit UI Press; 1998. 457 – 460. 13. Pak E, Esrason KT, Wu VH. Hepato-toxicity of herbal remedie: An emerging dilemma. Prog Transplant. 2004; 14 – 91 – 6. 14. Tédong L, Dzeufiet DDP, Kamtchouing P. Acute and subchronic toxicity of anacardium occidentale linn (anacardiaceae) leaves hexane extract in mice. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Medicines, Cameroon. 2007; 4(2): 140 – 147. 15. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig’s restorative dental materials, 13th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier Inc; 2012. 327 – 348. 16. Schmalz G. Use of cell cultures for toxicity testing of dental materials: advantages and limitations. J Dent. 1994; 22: 6 – 11. 17. Amalia. Uji sitotoksik ekstrak etanol 70% buah merica (Piper nigrum L.) terhadap sel hela. Skripsi. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta; 2008. 16. 18. Donatus IA. Toksikologi Dasar, Laboratorium Farmakologi dan Toksikologi Fakultas Farmasi Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta; 2001. 7. 19. Toxnet. Phenol, National library of medicine, Rockville Pike, United state. 2013; diakses dari: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin, (01/07/2014). 20. Cotran MD, Kumar V, dan Collins T. Robbins pathologic of disease, 6th ed., W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelpia; 1999. 6 – 8, 4 – 15, 102 – 110. 21. Akiyama H, Fuji K, Yamasaki O, Oon T, Iwatsuji K. Antibacterial action of several tannins against Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Lawrence. 2001; 48: 487 – 491. 22. Juliantina FR, Citra DA, Nirwani B. Manfaat Sirih Merah (Piper crocatum) sebagai Agen Antibakterial terhadap Bakteri Gram Positif dan Gram Negatif, JKKI; 2009. 1. 23. Brunner TJ, Wick P, Manser P, Spohn P, Grass RN, Limbach LK, Bruinink A, Stark, WJ. In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility, Environ Sci Technol. 2006; 40: 4374 – 4381. 24. Meriç G, Dahl JE, Ruyter IE. Cytotoxicity of silica-glass fiber reinforced composites. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(9): 1201 – 1206.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.10730
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3002 | views : 5143Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.