* Corresponding Author
Differences in bone quality and condylar head shape between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-diabetic patients
https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.103504 Rahmi Amalia(1*), Teuku Harqad(2), Lusi Epsilawati(3), Merry Damayanti(4), Rohmat Nursin(5)
(1) Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Specialty Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
(2) Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Specialty Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
(3) Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
(4) Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
(5) Primary Care Department. Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aimed to compare bone quality—assessed through mandibular bone density—and condylar head shape between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-diabetic (non-DM) individuals, using bone histogram values derived from panoramic radiographs. An observational descriptive design with a cross-sectional approach was employed. The study population comprised all panoramic radiographic records collected during the study period. The sample consisted of 25 radiographs: 11 from male patients (DM and non-DM) and 14 from female patients (DM and non-DM), aged 40–60 years. Bone density was measured using a histogram analysis within a 4 × 4 mm region of interest (ROI) in the condylar head area, and the condylar head shape was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was subsequently performed. The findings revealed no statistically significant difference in mandibular bone density in the condylar area between DM and non-DM patients (p > 0.005). Similarly, the condylar head shape was predominantly oval in both groups. While individuals with type 2 DM tended to exhibit lower bone density values than non-DM individuals, the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in bone density were observed between the left and right condylar heads. However, variations in condylar head morphology were noted.
Keywords
Full Text:
5. Rahmi AmaliaReferences
1. Singh N, Kesherwani R, Tiwari AK, Patel DK. A review on diabetes mellitus. The Pharma
Innovation Journal. 2016; 5(7): 36-40.
2. Shotliff K. Diabetes mellitus. Oxford Medicine Online; 2018.
3. Goldenberg RM, Punthakee Z. Definition, classification and diagnosis of diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome. Can J Diabetes. 2018; 42 (Suppl 1): S10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.003
4. Petersmann A, Müller-Wieland D, Müller UA, Landgraf R, Nauck M, Freckmann G, Heinemann L, Schleicher E. Definition, classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019; 127(S01): S1-S7. doi: 10.1055/a-1018-9078
5. Galicia-Garcia U, Benito-Vicente A, Jebari S, Larrea-Sebal A, Siddiqi H, Uribe KB, Ostolaza H, Martín C. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(17):
6275. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176275
6. Stumvoll M, Goldstein BJ, van Haeften TW. Type 2 diabetes: principles of pathogenesis
and therapy. Lancet. 2005; 365(9467): 1333-1346. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61032-X
7. Weyer C, Bogardus C, Mott DM, Pratley RE. The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin. Invest. 1999; 104(6): 787-794. doi: 10.1172/JCI7231
8. Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2017; 389(10085): 2239-
2251. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30058-2
9. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: A pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016; 387(10027): 1513-1530. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8
10. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(5): 383-393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021778
11. Rachmawati N, Firman RN, Epsilawati L, Damayanti MA. Analysis of the panoramic
radiographic density of the mandibular bone in the elderly due to increased cortisol levels. Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI). 2022; 6(2): 55-58. doi: 10.32793/jrdi.v6i2.885
12. Cahyaningsih MN, Saraswati LD, Yuliawati S, Wuryanto MA. Gambaran Densitas Mineral
Tulang (DMT) pada Kelompok Dewasa Awal (19-25 Tahun) (Studi di Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Diponegoro). Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2017; 5(4): 424-430.
doi: 10.14710/jkm.v5i4.18525
13. Licata A. Bone density vs bone quality: what’s a clinician to do?. Cleve Clin J Med. 2009:
76(6): 331-336. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.76a.08041
14. Barlian B, Azhari, Pramanik F. Correlation between mandibular trabeculae bone density on panoramic radiograph and body mass index of men aged 5-35 years old. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science. 2018; 3(3): 166-168.
15. Camargo AJ, Côrtes ARG, Aoki EM, Baladi MG, Arita ES, Watanabe PCA. Analysis of
bone quality on panoramic radiograph in osteoporosis research by fractal dimension.
Applied Mathematics. 2016; 7(4): 375-386. doi: 10.4236/am.2016.74035
16. White SC. Oral radiographic predictors of osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;
31(2): 84-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600674
17. Horner K, Devlin H, Harvey L. Detecting patients with low skeletal bone mass. J Dent.
2002; 30(4): 171-175. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00010-6
18. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kroger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res. 1994; 102(1): 68-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01156.x
19. Anjani KG, Nurrachman AS, Rahman FUA, Firman RN. Bentuk dan posisi kondilus sebagai marker pada Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) melalui radiografi panoramik. 2020; 4(3): 91-100. doi: 10.32793/jrdi.v4i3.609
20. Khandelwal N, Rajauria S, Kanjalkar S, et al. Bone mineral density evaluation among type 2 diabetic patients in rural haryana, india: an analytical cross-sectional study. Cureus.
2023; 15(9): e45908. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45908
21. WHO: Diabetes fact sheet. 2023. Accessed: October 15, 2024: https://www.who.int/newsroom/factsheets/detail/diabetes.
22. Qiu J, Li C, Dong Z, Wang J. Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for low bone density: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021; 21(1): 65.
doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00728-3
23. Paschou SA, Dede AD, Anagnostis PG, Vryonidou A, Morganstein D, Goulis DG. Type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis: a guide to optimal management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 102(10): 3621-3634. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00042
24. Ali D, Tencerova M, Figeac F, Kassem M, Jafari A. The pathophysiology of osteoporosis
in obesity and type 2 diabetes in aging women and men: The mechanisms and roles of increased bone marrow adiposity. Front. Endocrinol. 2022; 13: 981487. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.981487
25. Kumari C, Yagoub GY, Ashfaque M, Jawed S, Hamid P. Consequences of diabetes mellitus
in bone health: traditional review. Cureus. 2021; 13(3): e13820. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13820
26. Ma L, Oei L, Jiang L, Estrada K, Chen H, Wang Z, Yu Q, Zillikens MC, Gao X, Rivadeneira F.
Association between bone mineral density and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
of observational studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021; 27(5): 319 - 332. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9674-x
27. Liu B, Liu J, Pan J, Zhao C, Wang Z, Zhang Q. The association of diabetes status and bone
mineral density among US adults: evidence from NHANES 2005-2018. BMC Endocr
Disord. 2023; 23(1): 27. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01266-w
28. Sosa M, Dominguez M, Navarro MC, Segarra MC, Hernández D, de Pablos P, Betancor P: Bone mineral metabolism is normal in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 1996; 10(4): 201-205. doi: 10.1016/1056-8727(95)00062-3
29. Alsaad LN, Abdulameer JA, Akolaa EA, Muttappallymyalil J, Sreedharan J. Bonemineral density and its determinants: a systematic review of risk factors and prevention strategies. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2023; 16(3): 1791-1796. doi: 10.13005/bpj/2758
30. Lapina NV, Skorikova LA, Shabalina IM, Gerbova TV, Kochurova EV. Evaluation of pathological changes of the temporomandibular joint in patients with type 2 diabetes. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 24(3): 189-192. doi: 10.17816/1728-2802-2020-24-3-189-192
31. Zhong X, Wang H, Jian X. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases-8 and -9 and their
tissue inhibitors in the condyles of diabetic rats with mandibular advancement. Exp Ther
Med. 2014; 8(5): 1357 - 1364. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1984
32. Prozorova NV, Fadeyev R, Veber VR, Chibisova M, Prozorova IV, Sokolova SM, Tarasenko AS, Golubjatnikov MV. Computed tomography attenuation of the upper and lower jaw bone tissue in patients with diabetes mellitus assessed by dental computed tomography. Actual problems in dentistry. 2021; 17(2): 148-155. doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-20-17-2-148-155
33. Galicia-Garcia U, Benito-Vicente A, Jebari S, Larrea-Sebal A, Siddiqi H, Uribe KB, Ostolaza
H, Martín C. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(17):
6275. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176275
34. Bunney PE, Zink AN, Holm AA, Billington CJ, Kotz CM. Orexin activation counteracts decreases in nonexercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) caused by high-fat diet. Physiol. Behav. 2017; 176: 139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040
35. Fu Z, Gilbert ER, Liu D. Regulation of insulin synthesis and secretion and pancreatic betacell
dysfunction in diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013; 9(1): 25-53.
36. Halban PA. Proinsulin processing in the regulated and the constitutive secretory pathway. Diabetologia. 1994; 2: S65-S72. doi: 10.1007/BF00400828
37. Boland BB, Rhodes CJ, Grimsby JS. The dynamic plasticity of insulin production in
beta-cells. Mol Metab. 2017; 6(9): 958-973. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.04.010
38. Rorsman P, Ashcroft FM. Pancreatic β-cell electrical activity and insulin secretion: of mice
and men. Physiol Rev. 2018; 98(1): 117-214. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00008.2017
39. Seino S, Shibasaki T, Minami K. Dynamics of insulin secretion and the clinical implications
for obesity and diabetes. J Clin Investig. 2011; 121(6): 2118-2125. doi: 10.1172/JCI45680
40. Cuinas A, Garcia-Morales V, Vina D, Gil-Longo J, Campos-Toimil M. Activation of PKA and Epac proteins by cyclic AMP depletes intracellular calcium stores and reduces calcium availability for vasoconstriction. Life Sci. 2016; 155: 102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.03.059
41. Sonal V, Sandeep P, Kapil G, Christine R. Evaluation of condylar morphology using
panoramic radiography. J Adv Clin Res Insights. 2016; 3(1): 5-8.
42. Suhartini. Kelainan pada temporo mandibular joint (TMJ). Stomatognatic J Kedokt Gigi Univ
Jember. 2011; 8(2): 76-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.103504
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 909
| 
views : 276
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.