Email this article 
Semantic Study: Analysis of References for Animal as Object in Animal Related Articles from Internet
https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v1i3.42083 Kartikasari Dwi Rokhmah(1*)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Analyzing the reference for particular object is appropriate in the study of text. This paper discusses the reference for animal in internet articles. The data sources are twenty articles with animal topics. They are taken from news.nationalgeographic.com and animal.discovery.com. The method is library research to collect qualitative findings. The analysis is on the use of reference and the factors that influence the use of reference. The findings show that the dominant reference she (n: 119; 40.8%) is influenced by the gender and singularity. In addition, the frequency of references he (n: 70; 23.9%), it (n: 41; 14.1%) and they (n: 62; 21.2%) are influenced by gender, singularity, plurality, association and writer’s attitude. However association and writer’s attitude factor is not conclusive for this study.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bachmann, I. “ Norm and variation on brazilian TV evening news programmes: The case of thirdperson direct-object anaphoric Reference1.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 88 (2011): n. 1-20. Web: http://search.proquest.com/docview/846931004?accountid=13771. 10 October 2013.
Bolinger, Dwight. “The Atomization of Meaning.” Linguistic Society of America :Language , Vol. 41, No. 4 (1965) : n. 555-573. Web: http://www.jstor.org/stable/411524. 13 Desember 2013.
Fromkin, Victoria, Robert Rodman, Nina Hyams. An Introduction to Language seventh edition. Boston: Wodsworth, 2003.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra and Dionysis Goutsos. Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, 1997.
Gutwinski, Waldemar. Cohesion in Literary Text. Mouton: The Hague, 1976.
Halliday, M A K and Ruqaiya Hasan. Cohesion in English. New York: Longman, 1976.
Halliday, M A K. Introduction to Functional Grammar. New York: Edward Arnold Press,1991.
Halliday, M A K and Ruqaiya Hasan. Language, Text and Context. New York: Longman, 1991.
Johnson, M. G. “A cognitive-features model of compound free associations". Psychol.Rev. (1970): n. 77 pag. 282–293. Web. 23 December 2013.
Lyons, John. Semantic Volume I. London: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
Lyons, John. Semantic Volume II. London: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
Palmer, F.R. Semantics Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1916.
Serratice, L. “Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns in englishitalian bilingual children”. Bilingualism, 10(3) (2007): n. 225-238. Web: http://search.proquest.com/docview/199783685?accountid=13771. 10 October 2013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v1i3.42083
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 414
| 
views : 543
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2012 Kartikasari Dwi Rokhmah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Lexicon Office
| English Department Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada Soegondo Building, 3rd Floor, Room 306 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telephone: +62 274 513096 Email: lexicon.fib@ugm.ac.id ISSN: 2746-2668 (Online) |
 LEXICON is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |
Lexicon is indexed in
