Bibliometric Analysis of Public Sector Innovation

https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.69862

I Putu Yoga Bumi Pradana(1), Ely Susanto(2*), Wahyudi Kumorotomo(3)

(1) Department of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Nusa Cendana University, Kupang, Indonesia
(2) Department of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Department of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article systematically reviewed the academic research surrounding public sector innovation (PSI) to deliver an overview of PSI development in public administration (PA). This study analyzed 289 articles published between 1970 and 2020 using a bibliometric meta-analysis with HistCite software and a qualitative approach. This study found four primary research streams in PSI literature: (1) nature of public sector innovation; (2) strategy and innovation capacity; (3) adoption and diffusion of innovation; and (4) implementation and impact of innovation. Our analysis also revealed that the strategy and innovation capacity cluster has the fastest growth in publications. While the nature of the PSI stream is the least published research area, leadership, and organizational culture were the highest frequent antecedent and identified impacts in the empirical PSI studies. Finally, we offer 20 future research directions for these four research streams. This study may be the first to use HistCite bibliometric and qualitative analysis to make detailed information about each research stream of PSI literature in the PA discipline by measuring the number of publications over 50 years. The results of our review are limited to PSI publications in the PA field, which stemmed from the web of science database.


Keywords


bibliometric analysis; HistCite; public administration; public sector innovation; research stream

Full Text:

PDF


References

Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money and Management, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00450.x

Apriliyanti, I. D., & Alon, I. (2017).Bibliometric analysis of absorptive capacity. International Business Review, 26(5), 896–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.007

Arundel, A., & Huber, D. (2013). From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,27, 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.009

Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2019). Drivers of exploitative and explorative innovation in a collaborative public-sector context. Public Management Review, 21(3), 446–472. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1500630

Bartlett, D., & Dibben, P. (2002). Public sector innovation and entrepreneurship: Case studies from local government. Local Government Studies, 28(4), 107–121. https:// doi.org/10.1080/714004159

Bernier, L., Hafsi, T., & Deschamps, C. (2015). Environmental Determinants of Public Sector Innovation: A study of innovation awards in Canada. Public Management Review, 17(6), 834–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.867066

Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation-From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008

Borins, S. (2000a). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterpris ing leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Revi ew , 60 (6), 498–507. https ://d oi. org/10.1111/0033-3352.00113

Borins , S. (2000b). What bord er? Public management innov ation in the United States and Canada. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 19(1), 46–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1520-6688(200024)19:1<46::AID- PAM4>3.0.CO;2-Z

Boyne, G. A., Gould-Williams, J. S., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2005). Explaining the adoption of innovation: An empirical analysis of public management reform. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(3), 419–435. https://doi. org/10.1068/c40m

Brown, L., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Risk and Innovation: Towards a framework for risk governance in public services. Public Management Review , 15 (2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.707681

Chandra, Y., & Walker, R. M. (2019). How Does A Seminal Article in Public Administration Diffuse and Influence the Field? Bibliometric Methods and the Case of Hood’s “A Public Management For All Seasons?” International Public Management Journal, 22(5), 712–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1498817

Chen, J., Walker, R. M., & Sawhney, M. (2020). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1674–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874

Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019a). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review , 21 (2), 264–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477

Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019b). An international exploration of barriers and tactics in the public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 00(00),1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1668470

Cucciniello, M., & Nasi, G. (2014). Evaluation of the Impacts of Innovation in the Health Care Sector: A comparative analysis. Public Management Review, 16(1), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.798026

Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016). Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics, 108(2), 595–611. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8

De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

De Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018). The Diffusion and Adoption of Public Sector Innovations : A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature. February, 1–18. https://doi. org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy001

Demircioglu, M. A. (2021). Sources of Innovation, Autonomy, and Employee Job Satisfaction in Public Organizations. Public Performance and Management Review,44(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1820350

Doberstein, C., & Charbonneau, É. (2020). Experimenting with public sector innovation: Revisiting Gow for the digital era. Canadian Public Administration, 63(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12353

Dudau, A., Kominis, G., & Szocs, M. (2018). Innovation failure in the eye of the beholder: towards a theory of innovation shaped by competing agendas within higher education. Public Management Review, 20(2), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1302246

Fernández, S., & Wise, L. R. (2010).An Exploration Of Why Public Organizations “ingest” Innovations. Public Administration, 88(4), 979–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01857.x

Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2015). Consumer brand relationships research: A bibliometric citation meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 380–390. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.010

Gieske, H., George, B., van Meerkerk, I., & van Buuren, A. (2020). Innovating and optimizing in public organizations: does more become less? Public Management Review, 22(4), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1588356

Gold en, O. (1990). I nno vation in Public Sector Human Services Programs: The Implications of Innovation by “Groping along” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/3325413

Hansen, & Nørup, I. (2017). Leading the Implementation of ICT Innovations. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12807.Leading

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x

Hartley, J., & Rashman, L. (2018). Innovation and inter-organizational learning in the context of public service reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 231–248. https://doi. org/10.1177/0020852318762309

Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136

Jaskyte, K. (2011). Predictors of Administrative and Technological Innov ations in No npro fit Organiz ations. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 77–86.

Jones, G. N. (1984). Bureaucratic Innovation in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 6(2), 153–177. https://doi. org/10.1080/02598272.1984.10800150

Jordan, S. R. (2014). The Innovation Imperative: An analysis of the ethics of the imperative to innovate in public sect or service delivery. Public Management Review, 16(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.790274

Jun, K. N., & Weare, C. (2011). Institutional motivations in the adoption of innovations: The case of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3),495–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq020

Lee, H. B. (1970). An application of innovation theory to the strategy of administrative reform in developing countries. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 177–189. https://doi. org/10.1007/BF00145204

Marques, T. M. G. (2021). Research on Public Service Motivation and Leadership: A Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(7). https://doi. org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1741615

Meijer, A. J. (2014). From Hero-Innovators to Distributed Heroism: An in-depth analysis of the role of individuals in public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 16(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806575

Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2020). The Dark Side of Public Innovation. Public Performance and Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1782954

Mergel, I. (2018). Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov. Public Management Review, 20 (5), 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044

Moldogaziev, T. T., & Resh, W. G. (2016). A Systems Theory Approach to Innovation Implementation: Why Organizational Location Matters. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4),677–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv047

Moore, M. H. (2005). Break-through innovations and c o ntinuo us im pro vem ent: Two different models of innovative processes in the public sector. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 43–50. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00449.x

Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in gov ernance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20. https://doi. org/10.1080/14719030701763161

Nählinder, J., & Eriksson, A. F. (2019). Outcome, process and support: analysing aspects of innovation in public sector organizations. Public Money and Management, 39(6), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1559617

Newman, J., Raine, J., & Skelcher, C. (2001). Transforming local gov ernment: Innovation and modernization. Public Money and Management, 21(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00262

Nolan, C. T., & Garavan, T. N. (2016). Human Resource Development in SMEs: A Systematic Review of the Literature. International Journal of Management Reviews,18(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12062

O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Implementing public innovations in network settings. Administration and Society, 29(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979702900201Oppi,

Oppi, C., Bagheri, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2019). Antecedents of innov ativ e work behaviour in healthcare: does efficacy play a role? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(1), 45–61. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2018-0267

Orazi, D. C., Turrini, A., & Valotti, G. (2013). Public sector leadership: New perspectives for research and practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 486–504. https://doi. org/10.1177/0020852313489945

Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9299.2011.01932.x

Ospina, S. M., Esteve, M., & Lee, S. (2018). Assessing Qualitative Studies in Public Administration Research. Public Administration Review, 78(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12837

Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation res earc h: What’ s next? Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice,12(May), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.), [B]New York: Free Press. In Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). [B] New York: Free Press.

Ropret, M., & Aristovnik, A. (2019). Public Sector Reform from the Post-New Public Management Perspective: Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Central European Public Administration Review, 17(2). https:// doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.2.05

Salge, T. O., & Vera, A. (2012). Benefiting from Public Sector Innovation: The Moderating Role of Customer and Learning Orientation. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02529.x

Scheirer, M. A. (2005). Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278752

Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T. (2019). Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes, 49(3), 1020–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2018-0696

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration and Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768

Stokes Berry, F. (1994). The Adoption of Strategic Planning. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 322–330. http://www.jstor. org/stable/pdf/977379.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A995a6f7abadac9c38a7049e753695b9b

Susanto, E. (2020). Does love of money matter for innovative work behavior in public sector organizations? Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(1), 71–85. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2020-0028

Taylor, J. (2020). Personnel reduction and growth, innovation, and em ployee optimism about the long-term benefits of organizational change. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0020852320934536

Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939

Torfing, J., Cristofoli, D., Gloor, P. A., Meijer, A. J., & Trivellato, B. (2020). Taming the snake in paradise: combining institutional design and leadership to enhance collaborative innovation. Policy and Society, 00(00), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1794749

Torugsa, N. (Ann), & Arundel, A. (2016). Complexity of Innovation in the public sector: A workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes. Public Ma na gem ent Review, 18(3), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.984626

van Acker, W., & Bouckaert, G. (2018). What makes public sector innovations survive? An exploratory study of the influence of feedback, accountability and learning. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 249–268. https://doi. org/10.1177/0020852317700481

Vento, I. (2020). Hand s-off or Hand s-on Governance for Public Innovation? A Comparative Case Study in the EU Cohes ion Polic y Im plem entation in Finland. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(11), 989–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1665065

Vicente, E., Camarero, C., & Garrido, M. J. (2012). Insights into innovation in european museums: The impact of cultural policy and museum characteristics. Public Ma na gem ent Revi ew , 14 (5), 649–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.642566

Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co- Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505

Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffussion: an empirical analysis of local government. 84(2), 311–335.

Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum026

Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A review and extension. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771698

Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., & Devece, C. A. (2011). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq043

Walker, R. M., Jeanes, E., & Rowlands, R. (2002). Measuring innovation - Applying the literature-based innovation output ind ic ator to public services. Public Administration, 80(1), 201–214. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00300

Wu, J., Ma, L., & Yang, Y. (2013). Innovation inthe Chinese public sector: Typology and distr ution. Public Administration, 91(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02010.x

Wynen, J., Boon, J., Kleizen, B., & Verhoest, K. (2020). How Multiple Organizational Changes Shape Managerial Support for Innov ativ e Work Behavior: Evidence From the Australian Public Service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(3), 491–515. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18824388

Yi, H., Berry, F. S., & Chen, W. (2018). Management Innovation and Policy Diffusion through Leadership Transfer Networks: An Agent Network Diffusion Model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy031

Yi, H., & Chen, W. (2019). Portable Innovation, Policy Wormholes, and Innovation Diffusion. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13090

Zhang, Y., & Zhu, X. (2020). Career cohorts and inter-jurisdictional innovation diffusion: an empirical exploration in China. International Public Management Journal, 23(3), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1510449

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Met hods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094428114562629



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.69862

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2655 | views : 2074

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  Information:

 

    

    

    

 

 

  View My Stats