Governing Alternative Resources for Social Policy: A Welfare Political Challenges on Mixed-Welfare Arrangements

https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.30433

Tauchid Komara Yuda(1*),

(1) Department of Social Development and Welfare (PSDK), Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The issue of social policy development in Indonesia has received considerable critical attention due often not consider non-state actor in the welfare provision. Data from several studies show that welfare system of contemporary Indonesia commonly fits with mix regime model, where the state, kinship relation, and markets play important role in provide social welfare for the society simultaneously. Accordingly, the greater efforts are needed to ensure that policy maker could regulate the ability to stimulate the compatible actor with likely welfare outcomes expected. By taking the empirical case of the Program Bedah Rumah Swadaya in Kulon Progo Regency Yogyakarta, this paper would examine the welfare politics that put community and market institutions as alternative resources to provides the decent houses for disadvantage groups. Correspondingly, this account composed into the three of main parts. The first part begins by laying out a brief overview of the foundation of Kulon Progo welfare system. The second part would identify how the political citizenship dimension is carried out through this programs. While the last part captures the resource arrangements in housing provision.


Keywords


social policy; welfare politics; program bedah rumah swadaya; alternative resources.

Full Text:

PDF


References

Aspalter, C. (2006). The East Asian welfare model. International Journal Social Welfare, 15(4), 290-301.

Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researcher.      The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.

Chan, K. H. R. (2006). Participatory welfare in South Korea: meaning and issues. CAPS Working Paper Series No.174.      Retrieved from http://commons.ln.edu.hk/capswp/9

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Penelitian kualitatif dan desain riset: memilih diantara lima pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Croissant, A. (2004). Changing welfare regimes in East and Southeast Asia: Crisis, change and challenge. Social Policy &      Administration38(5), 504-524.

Damsar. (2012). Sosiologi politik. Jakarta: Kencana. 

Dukelow, F. (2011). Economic crisis and welfare retrenchment: comparing Irish policy responses in the 1970s and 1980s with      the present. Social Policy and Administration, 45(4), 408-429.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1985). Politics against market: the social democratic road to power. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton      University Press.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press

Forum CSR Kabupaten Kulon Progo. (2015). [Dokumen Laporan Pertanggung Jawaban Forum CSR Kabupaten Kulon Progo].      Unpublished raw data. 

Gough, I. (2004). Welfare regime in development context: a global and regional analysis. In I. Gough, G. Wood, A.      Barrientos, P. Bevan, P. Davis, & G. Room, (Eds.), Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America (pp.      15-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gough, I. (2013). Social policy regimes in the developing world. In K. Patricia, (Ed.), A Handbook of Comparative Social      Policy (pp. 205-224). Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Gustomy, R. (2010). Negara menata umat. Yogyakarta: POLGOV UGM.

Halimatusya’diah, I. (2015). Zakat and social protection: The relationship between socio- religious CSOs and the government      in Indonesia. Journal of Civil Society, 11(1), 79-99.

Hall, A., & Migdley, J. (2004). Social policy for development. London: SAGE Publication.

Hanif,  H.  (2008).  Mencari  wajah  politik masyarakat risiko (risk society): sub politik, demokrasi diskursif, dan proses      kebijakan deliberatif. Jurnal Mandatory, 4(4), 74-86

Hanif, H. (2012). Dibawah bayang-bayang kewargaan pasar (market citizenship)?: menegaskan politik inklusi, mengabaikan      politik redistribusi. Retrieved from http:// www.academia.edu/4503514/Dibawah_ B a y a n g- B ay an g_ K ew a r ga a n      _P a s a r _ Market_Citizenship_

Heyman, J. (2012). Deepening the anthropology of bureaucracy. Anthropological Quarterly85(4), 1267-1277.

Hujo, K., & McClanahan, S. (2009). Financing social policy: mobilizing resources for social de v e lopme n t.  Basingst oke:  P      algrav e Macmilan.

Ibrahim, S. M. (2015). The role of zakat in establishing social welfare and economic  sustainability. International Journal of       Management and Commerce Innovations, 3(1), 437-441.

Ikhsanto,  M.  A.  (2008).  Dilema  skema pembiayaan kebijakan sosial. In M. Ucu, (Ed.), Kebijakan Sosial dan      Kesejahteraan. Yogyakarta: FISIPOL UGM.

Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S. (2011). Citizenship studies: An introduction. In E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of      Citizenship Studies (pp. 1-10). Los Angeles: SAGE.

Joedadibrata, D. (2012). A study of the shift towards universal social policy in Indonesia. MSc Thesis. Hague: International      Institute of Social Studies.

Kotchen,  M.  (2014). Public Goods. In J. L. Caviglia, T. C. Haab, & J.C. Whitehead (Eds.). Environmental and natural      resource economics: an encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: Greenwood.

Kurniawan, N. I. (2009). Globalisasi dan negara kesejahteraan: perspektif institutionalism. Yogyakarta: Laboratorium Jurusan      Ilmu Pemerintahan, FISIPOL UGM.

Kwon, H. (2009). The reform of the developmental welfare state in East Asia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(1),      12-21.

Lewis, J. (Ed.). (1999). The voluntary sector in the mixed  economy of welfare. In D. Gladstone (Ed.), Before Beveridge:      Welfare Before the Welfare State. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit.

Martono, U. ( 2 0 0 8 ). Kebijakan sosial dan kesejahteraan. Yogyakarta: FISIPOL UGM.

Mas’udi, W., & Hanif, H. (2010). Social welfare politics in contemporary Indonesia: understanding the social      welfare vision      in Act 11 of 2009 (Working Paper No.3 03/2010). Yogyakarta: PCD Press Universitas Gadjah Mada.

McClain, P. D. (1990). Agenda setting, public policy, and minority group influence: an introduction. Policy Studies Review,      9(2), 263-272.

Media Center. (2015). Kemiskinan Kulon Progo menurun. (February 2, 2016). Retrieved from      http://www.kulonprogokab.go.id/v21/2015--Kemiskinan-Kulon-Progo-Menurun_4108

Meeuwisse, A., & Swärd, H. (2009). Social work programmes in the social democratic welfare regime. International Journal      of Social Welfare, 18(4): 365-374.

Menoh, G., A., B. (2015). Agama dalam ruang publik. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Moreno, L. (2010). Welfare mix, CSR and social citizenship. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(11),      683- 696. doi: 10.1108/01443331011085268

Norton, A., Conway, T., & Foster, M. (2001). Social protection concepts and approaches: implication for policy and practice in      international development. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.

Powell, M., & Barrientos, A. (2004). Welfare regime and welfare mix. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1), 83-105.

Pratikno. (2005). Good Governancedan Governability. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 8(3), 231-248.

Raper, M. (2008). Social security and social protection in Australia and Indonesia. Jakarta: Trade Union Right.

Rodhes, M., & Natali, D. (2003).   Welfare Regimes and Pension Reform Agendas. Retrieved from http://paperroom.ipsa.org/      papers/paper_2399.pdf

Schartau, M. (2009). The road to welfare pluralism: old age and care in Sweden, Germany, and Britain. Berlin: BWV, Berliner      Wiss.-Verl.

Setda Kabupaten Kulon Progo. (2016). Daftar Penerima Bantuan Bedah Rumah Non-APBD. 

Shi, S. (2016). The Bounded Welfare Pluralism: Public–Private Partnerships Under Social Management in      China. Public Management Review, 19(4), 463-478. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1183700

Suharko. (2005). Masyarakat sipil, modal sosial, dan tata pemerintahan yang demokratis. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik,      8(3), 263-290.

Sumarto, M. (2007). Social safety nets and economic transition in Indonesia: Paradox of social services. Journal of      Administration and Governance, 2(1), 54-60.

Sumarto, M. (2014). Perlindungan Sosial dan Klientelisme: Makna politik bantuan tunai dalam pemilihan umum. Yogyakarta:      Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sumarto, M. (2017). Welfare regime change in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. Social Policy and      Administration, 51(6), 940-959.

Suparjan. (2010). Jaminan sosial berbasis komunitas: respon atas kegagalan negara dalam penyediaan jaminan      kesejahteraan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 13(3), 1-18. 

TKPK Kulon Progo. (2014). Buku saku panduan penanggulangan kemiskinan. Wa tes: Pemerintah Kabupaten Kulon Progo.  

TNP2K. (2011). Indikator Kesejahteraan Daerah Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Retrieved from      http://www.tnp2k.go.id/ images/uploads/downloads/34_DIY.pdf

Torheim, R. (2013). Foundation of welfare regime: the case of Indonesia. Master Thesis. Oslo: Department of Political      Scienes, University of Oslo.

Tribowo, D., & Bahagijo, S. (2006). Mimpi negara kesejahteraan. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Walker, A., & Wong, C. (2005). East Asian

welfare regime in transition: from confucian to globalization. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press, University of Bristol.

Warington, M. J. (1995). Welfare plurarism or shadow state? the provision of social housing in the 1990’s. Environmental and      Planning, 27(1), 1341-1360.

Yeboah-Assiama, E., Musah-Suguru, I. J. N., & Nurudeen, S. (2015). the ‘third sector’ and poverty reduction in developing      societies: the experience of hunger project in selected rural communities of Ghana. International Journal of Rural      Management, 11(2), 85-110. doi: 10.1177/0973005215601944

Yuda, T., K., (2016). Memaknai ulang corporate social responsibility: upaya mewujudkan fair responsibility. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial      dan Ilmu Politik, 19(3), 200-217.

Zuska, F. (2005). Penghampiran antropologi atas kebijakan dan kekuasaan: berefleksi dari kebijakan otonomi daerah. Jurnal      Antropologi Sosial Budaya ETNOVISI, 1(3), 151-158.


 



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.30433

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 801 | views : 259

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

 

                                      Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada                                           Jl. Sosio-Yustisia, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281. Phone: (0274) 563362 ext. 154, +62 822 9979-6677                                                                   Email: jurnalsospol@ugm.ac.id