Interdependence versus Truth and Justice: Lessons from Reconciliation Processes in Maluku

https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.17998

Diah Kusumaningrum(1*)

(1) Lecturer of Department of International Relation Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Truth commissions and trials have been applauded as the way to move on from a violent past. Yet, some post-conflict societies managed to move toward reconciliation without the presence, or the effective presence of such formal institutions. This article discusses a number of lessons learned from Maluku, where reconciliation took the interdependence path. Taking on an interpretive, emic approach, it elaborates on the sites and mechanisms of interpendence. It argues that interdependence can be as viable as truth and justice procedures in bringing about reconciliation.

Keywords


interdependence; reconciliation; Maluku conflict.

Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.17998

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1012 | views : 1223

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  Information:

     Call for Paper 2019

    Read

    

    



  View My Stats