Pembentukan Struktur Negosiasi Kota Surakarta: Kritik Nalar ‘Best Practices’ dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan

https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.11389

Hendra Try Ardianto(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper attempts to describe two fundamental ideas about best practices. Firstly, criticism of the notion of "best practices" that is very agent-centric. It asserts that the discourse "best practices" should not be separated from socio political structures. In the case of Surakarta, the agency perspective that put Jokowi as the center of innovation was apparently failed to understand the overall dynamics of governance practices and tend to be misleading. Secondly, this paper tries to restore the meaning of participation as a form of politicization, not merely procedural- managerial affairs. Thus, participation is not only a mobilization to encourage the dreams of innovation, rather, participation is a matter of negotiation in which the contestation of interests between people, nations, and the market becomes the main case.

Keywords


struktur-agen; partisipasi; arena partisipasi; negosiasi; best practices; structure-agen; participation; arena of participation; negotiation

Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.11389

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 419 | views : 425

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik



  Information:

     Call for Paper 2019

    Read

    

    



  View My Stats