OnlyFans and the Plebeians: Emancipatory moments in contemporary Indonesia

Tri Nawangsari; Sven Wiesrecker

doi:10.22146/jps.v12i1.107259

OnlyFans and the Plebeians: Emancipatory moments in contemporary Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v12i1.107259

Tri Nawangsari⁽¹⁾, Sven Wiesrecker^(2*)

(1) Department of Sociology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University, Germany
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The online platform OnlyFans has attracted a lot of attention in empirical research in recent years. In this analysis, we use a special approach that connects concepts from political philosophy and empirical research. First, we provide a detailed explanation of Jacques Rancière’s notion of the “distribution of the sensible”. Rancière’s example of the plebeians serves to illustrate how certain groups are excluded from participation. Rancière's philosophical perspective on emancipation in Indonesia is of added value because it links the embodiment of roles, which has already been addressed many times in research, with political moments. Secondly, we examine empirical data to explore how OnlyFans is perceived in Bali. By doing so, we trace how narratives surrounding sexuality, morality, and digital labor intersect with local cultural and social frameworks. These insights allow us to identify emerging tensions that reflect deeper structural issues within the social fabric. Thirdly, we argue that these tensions can be read as disruptions of the current social order — ruptures that may reveal emancipatory potential. We interpret them through the lens of Jacques Derrida’s concept of deconstruction. Our aim is not to reconstruct or stabilize social orders, but to highlight the fractures, inconsistencies, and instabilities that reveal the possibility for change within an existing system.

Keywords

OnlyFans; Indonesia; Jacques Rancière; Emancipation; Distribution of the Sensible

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bak, Basak and Rebecca Rose Nocella. 2023. “Unveiling Copyright Law Double Bind through Pragmatist Feminism: Adult Content Creators as Authors.” Porn Studies 10(4):431–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2023.2225531.

Biesta, Gert. 2010. “Learner, Student, Speaker: Why It Matters How We Call Those We Teach.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 42(5–6):540–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00684.x.

Bonifacio, Ross, Jirassaya Uttarapong, Rae Jereza and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2025. “Self-Promotion Practices and Context Collapse Management of Adult Content Creators on OnlyFans.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3701206.

Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Easterbrook-Smith, Gwyn. 2023. “OnlyFans as Gig-Economy Work: A Nexus of Precarity and Stigma.” Porn Studies 10(3):252–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2022.2096682.

Foucault, Michel, Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality: With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ghaitsa Fakhirah, Tsania, Amirudin Amirudin, Af’idatul Lathifah and Arido Laksono, P. Studi Antropologi Sosial, F. Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, and K. Tembalang Semarang. 2021. “Kajian Netnografi Aktivitas Komersialisasi Tubuh Para Kreator OnlyFans.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Antropologi 5(1):19-47.

Gorissen, Sebastiaan. 2024. “Content Creation and Gig-Work in the Platform Economy: What Contemporary Sex Work Can Teach Us About the Futures of Digital Labor.” Information Society 40(5):309–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2024.2381481.

Hamilton, Vaughn, Ananta Soneji, Allison McDonald and Elissa M. Redmiles. 2023. “‘Nudes? Shouldn’t I Charge for These?’: Motivations of New Sexual Content Creators on OnlyFans.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580730.

Ji, Yadong and Yachao Li. 2025. “OnlyFans Use and Satisfactions with Oneself and Others: The Role of Upward Social Comparison.” New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251342235.

Muning, Tunjung and Abraham Ferry Rosando. 2024. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Platform OnlyFans Dalam Produksi dan Distribusi Konten Pornografi.” SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum 3(3):188–193. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i3.1292.

Nawangsari, Tri. 2024. Fantrepreneur OnlyFans dan Perkembangan Seksualitas di Era Kapitalisme (Studi Fenomenologi Tubuh Konten Kreator OnlyFans Bali). Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Quintana, Laura. 2019. “Jacques Rancière and the Emancipation of Bodies.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 45(2):212–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718780529.

Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London: Continuum.

Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Turner, Bryan S. 2008. The Body & Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://sagepub.net/tcs.

Tynan, Luke and Conor Linehan. 2024. “OnlyFans: How Models Negotiate Fan Interaction.” Sexuality and Culture 28(5):2289–2322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-024-10230-2.

Usman, Sahda Armandiva and Kholiq Budiman. 2023. “Unrevealing the Role of Social Media on Online Sex Trafficking: A Case Study and Conceptual Model of Cyber Prostitution in Indonesia.” Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology 5(2):242-259. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jaist.

Vickers, Elaine, and Belinda Brooks–Gordon. 2023. “Growth and Diversity of the Online Solopreneur and Sexpreneur.” Current Opinion in Psychology 49. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101474.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v12i1.107259