Build Operate Transfer: Does it Apply Universally? The Case of Dinoyo Malang City Mall, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.48855

Luqman Hakim(1*)

(1) Universitas Brawijaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Politics change, so does public administration.  The aim of this research is to evaluate the Build Operate Transfer (BOT) – based policy in the modernization of Dinoyo Traditional Market Malang city, East Java province, Indonesia.  The research was conducted during 20172018.  The research was based on a qualitative research design, and used in-depth interview, observation and documentation to collect data. Research results showed that the change in Indonesian political landscape that begin with the  step down of President Soeharto from  office  in May 1998, also served as a  milestone of radical change in public administration. The change in politics from authoritarianism towards democracy, also affected the way government is organized and the delivery of public services are delivered from an over centralized to a decentralized approach. The BOT scheme in the public service delivery, is a public private partnership arrangement, which is a new alternative available to deliver public services.  The Dinoyo Traditional Market,   which was developed by the central government in 1980s, has since been redeveloped to become a modern market that is today known as Malang City Mall. Under the BOT scheme, a group of private Indonesian Chinese investors financed the reconstruction of the market, and have the opportunity to operate the mall for a certain period, after which ownership will revert to the city government. Some of the adverse effects of BOT arrangement include decline in income of small traditional traders due to the loss of space to carry out their activities, marginalization of traditional tenants as their products are replaced by domestically manufactured and imported goods, caused disputes due to the feeling of unfairness.   
 

Keywords


built operate transfer (BOT), conflicts, good governance, modernization, political economy of development, traditional market

Full Text:

PDF


References

Alamsyah, M. S. (2017). Dinamika Konflik Revitalisasi Dan Relokasi Pedagang Pasar Tradisional Dinoyo Kota Malang. Retrieved from http://repository.ub.ac.id/7602/

Arianty, N. (2018). Difference Analysis.

Aulawi, T. S. dan H. (2015). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi yang mempengaruhi return saham. 13(September), 1–16.

Bebbington, A., Dharmawan, L., Fahmi, E., & Guggenheim, S. (2006). Local Capacity, Village Governance, and the Political Economy of Rural Development in Indonesia. World Development, 34(11), 1958–1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.025

Castle, E. N., Wu, J. J., & Weber, B. A. (2011). Place Orientation and rural-urban interdependence. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 33(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppr009

Cowan, C. D. (1954). Economics and Economic Policy of Dual Societies as Exemplified by Indonesia. International Affairs, 30(2), 259–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/2607628

Dan, T., Pribumi, E., Kota, D. I., Fadhil, A., Syam, A., & Rakib, M. (n.d.). Sikap Kewirausahaan, Etnis Tionghoa dan Etnis Pribumi.

Daryanto, A. (2009). Revitalisasi Pasar Tradisional. Trobos, 58–59.

Edition, F. (n.d.). Cost_Management.pdf.

Gunawan, D. (2018). 5.000 Pasar Dibangun di Era Presiden Jokowi.

Hlaing, Z. C., Kamiyama, C., & Saito, O. (2017). Interaction between Rural People’s Basic Needs and Forest Products: A Case Study of the Katha District of Myanmar. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2105012

Indradi, S. S. (2005). Kepemerintahan dan Kemitraan. Cetakan Pertama. Malang, Agritek YPN.

K., D. P. (2004). Selection and application of risk management tools and techniques for build‐operate‐transfer projects. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(4), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570410530748

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. (n.d.). Retrieved October 1, 2019, from https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/17083/presiden-ri-resmikan-pasar-rakyat-hasil-revitalisasi-kemendag/0/artikel_gpr

Minten, B., & Reardon, T. (2008). Food prices, quality, and quality’s pricing in supermarkets versus traditional markets in developing countries. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(3), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.00422.x

Rahayuningrum, N., & Tjahya, W. (n.d.). Kajian Dampak Ekonomi Keberadaan Hypermarket Terhadap Ritel/ Pasar Tradisional. Retrieved from https://www.kemendag.go.id/files/pdf/2014/11/19/-1416392887.pdf

Sasanto, R., & Yusuf, M. (2010). Identifikasi Karakteristik Pasar Tradisional di Wilayah Jakarta Selatan (Studi Kasus: Pasar Cipulir, Pasar Kebayoran Lama, Pasar Bata Putih dan Pasar Santa). Jurnal Planesa, 1(1).

Satterthwaite, D., McGranahan, G., & Tacoli, C. (2010). Urbanization and its implications for food and farming. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2809–2820. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0136

Sumintarsih. (2011). Eksistensi Pasar Tradisional : Relasi dan Jaringan Pasar Tradisional di Kota Surabaya - Jawa Timur. Yogyakarta: Balai Pelestarian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional Yogyakarta.

Susanto, R. Y., & Prihatminingtyas, B. (2016). Kajian Pedagang Pasar Tradisional Dan Pasar Modern Di Kota Malang.

UNDP. (2011). Governance Principles, Institutional Capacity and Quality. Towards Human Resilience: Sustaining MDG Progress in an Age of Economic Uncertainty. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Poverty Reduction/Inclusive development/Towards Human Resilience/Towards_SustainingMDGProgress_Ch8.pdf



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.48855

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1824 | views : 1241

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.