Does Public Service Motivation Matter to Employees’ Performance and Organizational Commitment in Sub-district Offices?

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.37913

Arif Budy Pratama(1*), Aidah Nurhidayah(2)

(1) University of Tidar
(2) Universitas Tidar
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Many studies on Public Service Motivation (PSM) were conducted extensively in the developed countries, including US and Western Europe. In addition, some research on PSM has been conducted in Eastern Asia, all which affirm the positive role that plays in in shaping the public sector. That said, studies on PSM in developing countries, including Indonesia is still limited. This is despite the fact that previous research associate PSM with improving public sector performance. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between public service motivation, organizational commitment, and individual performance in Magelang Municipality, which is one of the high performing local govern,ents in Indonesia. The data was drawn from 70 government employees in 3 Magelang Municipality sub-district Offices. Meanhwile, to to test the research hypothesises. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was used. Resulst of the study validated the previous research findings that indicate positive influence of PSM on organizational commitment and individual performance. The result of this study has a practical implication for human resource development policy in Indonesian public sector. To that end, Public managers should take into account PSM in their managerial practices as it influences employee performance.

 


Keywords


individual performance; organizational commitment; public service motivation; structural equation modelling

Full Text:

PDF


References

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x

Bangcheng, L. (2009). Evidence of public service motivation of social workers in China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 349–366. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309104180

Belle, N. (2013). Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–153. http://doi.org/10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02621.x.Experimental

Blumberg, B., Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2011). Business research methods. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

Brewer, G. A, Selden, S. C., & Facer II, R. L. (2000). Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 254–264. http://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00085

Bright, L. (2007). Does Person-Organization Fit Mediate the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and the Job Performance of Public Employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(4), 361–379. http://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X07307149

Caillier, J. G. (2014). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between transformational leadership, public service motivation, mission valence, and employee performance: A preliminary study. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 218–239. http://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014528478

Camilleri, E., & Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2007). Organizational Commitment, Public Service Motivation, and Performance Within the Public Sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 241–274. http://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576310205

Castaing, S. (2006). The Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Public Service Motivation on Organizational Commitment in the French Civil Service. Public Policy and Administration Volume, 21(1), 84–98.

Daisuke, N., & Kumorotomo, W. (1998). Pelajaran dari Reformasi Birokrasi di Jepang 1945-1952. Jurnal Kebijakan & Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 41–57.

DPMPTSP Kota Magelang. (2016, May 30). Kota Magelang Memiliki Daya Saing Tertinggi di Jawa Tengah. Retrieved from http://bp2t.magelangkota.go.id/index.php/15-headline/632-kota-magelang-memiliki-daya-saing-tertinggi-di-jawa-tengah

Ghozali, I. (2008). Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program Amos 16.0. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hooper, D., Mullen, J., Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58

Jaros, S. (2007). Meyer and Allen Model of Organizational Commitment : Measurement Issues. The Icfai Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6(4), 7–26. http://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X118685

Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K.,  De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus027

Leisink, P., & Steijn, B. (2009). Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 35–52. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308099505

Liando, D. M. (2012). Implementasi Kebijakan Pembentukan Daerah Otonom Baru dan Dampaknya Bagi Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Kebijakan & Administrasi Publik, 16(2), 47–62.

Liu, B.-C., & Tang, T. L.-P. (2011). Does the Love of Money Moderate the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Satisfaction? The Case of Chinese Professionals in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 718–727. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02411.x

Mostafa, A., Gould-Williams, J., & Bottomly, P. (2015). High-Performance Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes: Th e Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation. Public Adinistration Review, 75(5), 747–757. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12354.High-Performance

Neuman, W. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson.

Noar, S. (2003). The Role of Structural Equation Modeling in Scale Development. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(4), 493–524. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1004

Nurtanzila, L., & Kumorotomo, W. (2015). Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Penerimaan PBB P2 di Kota Yogyakarta Pasca Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pengelolaan PBB P2 oleh Pusat Kepada Daerah. Jurnal Kebijakan & Administrasi Publik, 19(2), 157–169.

Osgood, C. (1964). Semantic Differential Technique in the Comparative Study of Cultures1. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 171–200.

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303

Perry, J. L. (2000). Bringing Society in: Toward a Theory of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471–488.

Perry, J. L., Brudney, J. L., Coursey, D., & Littlepage, L. (2008). What drives morally committed citizens? A study of the antecedents of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 445–458. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00881.x

Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367. http://doi.org/10.2307/976618

Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603–609. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0037335

Potipiroon, W., & Ford, M. T. (2017). Does Public Service Motivation Always Lead to Organizational Commitment? Examining the Moderating Roles of Intrinsic Motivation and Ethical Leadership. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 211–238. http://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017717241

Pratama, A. B. (2017a). Agencification in Asia: Lessons from Thailand, Hong Kong, and Pakistan. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 21(1), 43. http://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.23008

Pratama, A. B. (2017b). Bureaucracy Reform Deficit in Indonesia: A Cultural Theory Perspective. Journal of Public Administration and Governance. http://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v7i3.11519

Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Organizatiortal Behavior, 23(March), 257–266. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.l41

Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook. Public Adinistration Review, 76(3), 414–426. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12505.Public

Robbins, S., Judge, T., & Campbell, T. (2017). Organizational Behaviour. Harlow: Pearson Education inc.

Rusu, R. (2013). Affective Organizational Commitment, Continuance Organizational Commitment, or Normative Organizational Commitment? Management and Economics, 2(2), 192–197.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2008). Research Methods for Business Students. Research methods for business students. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Van der Wal, Z. (2015). “All quiet on the non-Western front?” A review of public service motivation scholarship in non-Western contexts. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 69–86. http://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2015.1041223

Van Loon, N., Kjeldsen, A. M., Andersen, L. B., Vandenabeele, W., & Leisink, P. (2018). Only When the Societal Impact Potential Is High? A Panel Study of the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and Perceived Performance. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 139–166. http://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16639111

Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. http://doi.org/10.2307/3381236

Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a Public Administration Th eory of Public Service Motivation: An Institutional Approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 45–56.

Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701726697

Vandenabeele, W., Scheepers, S., & Hondeghem, A. (2006). Public service motivation in an international comparative perspective: The UK and Germany. Public Policy and …, 21(1), 13–31.

Vigoda, E. (2001). Performance in the Third Sector: a Micro-Level Framework and Some Lessons From Israel. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(11), 1267–1288. http://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-100105238

Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2015). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. National Institutes of Health, 76(6), 913–934. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237.Sample

Wright, B. E., Hassan, S., & Christensen, R. K. (2017). Job Choice and Performance: Revisiting Core Assumptions about Public Service Motivation. International Public Management Journal, 20(1), 108–131. http://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1088493

Wright, T. A. (1997). Job performance and organizational commitment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 447–450. http://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.2.447

 



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.37913

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 159 | views : 144

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright of JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) ISSN 0852-9213 (print), ISSN 2477-4693 (online)

Gedung MAP FISIPOL UGM, Kampus FISIPOL UGM Unit II

Jl. Prof. Dr. Sardjito, Sekip, Yogyakarta, 55281,

Phone: 0274-563825

Fax: 0274-589655
Email: igpa@ugm.ac.id