Amanda Acintya(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author


Introduction/Main Objectives: Management accounting practices (MAPs) have long been recognized as a subject of interest with regards to business performance, including for Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). Despite the significant role of this sector in emerging countries, there is a dearth of research into the practical implementation of MAPs. Background Problems: The purpose of this paper is to gain a general understanding of whether modern and traditional MAPs, in the MSMEs’ context, are on an equal footing in terms of usage and perceived importance. We adopt the IFAC’s management accounting (MA) evolution model to structure this research. Novelty: This study contributes by tracing the adoption of MAPs as an indicator of the MSMEs’ need for MA information. Within an academic and regulatory framework, this study is believed to provide an important contribution for academicians, practitioners and the government. Research Methods: We conducted an attended survey of 34 MSMEs around Yogyakarta and used the simple yet meaningful statistical technique of descriptive analytics. Findings/Results: The findings indicate that traditional MAPs (the ones in IFAC stages 1 and 2) were found to be marginally better implemented than the modern MAPs (IFAC stages 3 and 4). We compute the difference of two proxies: extent of implementation (EI) and perceived importance (PI) as an indicator of the gap in their operationalization. We found that as the IFAC stage moves along to the modern MAPs spectrum, the average difference between EI-PI also moves up accordingly. Conclusion: Hence, despite the better implementation of traditional MAPs among the MSMEs, it does not eliminate the opportunity for the increasing usage of modern MAPs in the future.


management accounting practices, MSMEs, management accounting evolution, Indonesian MSMEs, management accounting techniques

Full Text:



Abdel-Kader, M., & Luther, R. (2006). IFAC’s conception of the evolution of management accounting: A research note. Advances in management accounting15, 229-247, available in DOI:10.1016/S1474-7871(06)15010-8.

Ahmad, K. (2017). The implementation of management accounting practices and its relationship with performance in small and medium enterprises. International Review of Management and Marketing7(1), 342-353.

Angelakis, G., Theriou, N., & Floropoulos, I. (2010). Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: Evidence from Greece and Finland. Advances in accounting26(1), 87-96, available in DOI:10.1016/j.adiac.2010.02.003.

Armitage, H. M., Webb, A., & Glynn, J. (2016). The use of management accounting techniques by small and medium‐sized enterprises: a field study of Canadian and Australian practice. Accounting Perspectives15(1), 31-69, available in DOI:10.1111/1911-3838.12089.

Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: an Australian study. Management accounting research9(1), 1-19, available in DOI:10.1006/mare.1997.0060.

Cuzdriorean, D. D. (2017). The use of management accounting practices by Romanian small and medium-sized enterprises: A field study. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems16(2), 291-312, available in DOI:10.24818/jamis.2017.02004.

Da Silva Laureano, R. M., Cardoso Vieira Machado, M. J., & da Silva Laureano, L. M. (2016). Maturity in management accounting: Exploratory study in Portuguese SME. Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe38(2), 139–156, available in DOI:10.1556/204.2016.38.1.

Fatimah, Y. A., Biswas, W., Mazhar, I., & Islam, M. N. (2013). Sustainable manufacturing for Indonesian small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): the case of remanufactured alternators. Journal of Remanufacturing3(1), 6, available in DOI 10.1186/2210-4690-3-6.

Hopper, T., Koga, T., & Goto, J. (1999). Cost accounting in small and medium sized Japanese companies: an exploratory study. Accounting and Business Research30(1), 73-86, available in DOI:10.1080/00014788.1999.9728925.

Hyvönen, J. (2005). Adoption and benefits of management accounting systems: evidence from Finland and Australia. Advances in International Accounting18, 97-120, available in DOI:10.1016/s0897-3660(05)18005-2 

Ittner, C., & Larcker, D. (2002). Empirical managerial accounting research: are we just describing management consulting practice? European Accounting Review11(4), 787-794, available in DOI:10.1080/0963818022000047082.

Kaplan, R. S. (1990). The four-stage model of cost systems design. Strategic Finance71(8), 22.

Kirby, D. A., & King, S. H. (1997). Accountants and small firm development: Filling the expectation gap. Service Industries Journal17(2), 294-304, available in DOI:10.1080/02642069700000017.

Lucas, M., Prowle, M., & Lowth, G. (2013). Management Accounting Practices of (UK) Small-Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Improving SME performance through management accounting educationChartered Institute of Management Accountants,  9 (4), 1–13.

Nandan, R. (2010). Management accounting needs of SMEs and the role of professional accountants: A renewed research agenda. Journal of applied management accounting research8(1), 65-78.

Nishimura, A. (2005), The Development of Management Accounting and the Asian Position.

Roostika, R. (2019). SMEs craft industry application of resource based view: capabilities role of SMEs performance. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research8, 423-440.

Senftlechner, D., & Hiebl, M. R. (2015). Management accounting and management control in family businesses: past accomplishments and future opportunities. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11, 573-606, available in DOI: 10.1108/JAOC-08-2013-0068.

Tambunan, T. (2008). SME development, economic growth, and government intervention in a developing country: The Indonesian story. Journal of international entrepreneurship6(4), 147-167, available in DOI 10.1007/s10843-008-0025-7.

Waweru, N. M. (2010). The origin and evolution of management accounting: a review of the theoretical framework. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 8 (3), 165 - 182


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 97 | views : 128


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business


Editorial Team
Focus and Scope
Peer Review Process
Publication Ethics
Screening for Plagiarism


Author Guidelines
Submission Guidelines
Online Submissions
Copyright Notice
Privacy Statement
Author Fees


Author Pack
Submission Form & Manuscript Template



Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewer Acknowledgement



General Search
Author index
Title index



The Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (print ISSN 2085-8272; online ISSN 2338-5847) is published by the Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

© 2019 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business 
 Visitor Statistics