THE NEED FOR A NEW DEFINITION OF SUSTAINABILITY
https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.29761 Shaharir b.M.Z.(1*), Alinor M.b.A.K.(2)
(1) Center for Civilization Dialog University of Malaya
(2) Institute of the Malay World and Civilization The National University of Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The present definition and scope of sustainability are reviewed by highlighting its various weaknesses including those that have been mentioned by Western scholars in development economics, ecological economics, environmental economics, and envirometrics. The emergence of a new field in the 1990’s, misleadingly named as eco-nomics, was to replace general economics. The presence of many forms of economics with new paradigms are purposely designed to improve development economics and at the same time to discuss and cope with the problems of sustainability. Our study on the nature and scope of sustainability was based on the history of the Malayonesian1 civilization and Islam, and practices of the present globalism. It has shown that not only is there a need to include an exhaustive environmental aspect (more than just the homo oeconomicus, flora and fauna) and a wider quantitative aspect (not just only statistics as well as other elements of mathematical science) but also to consider much more basic and important in the definition of sustainability. In this regard, we criticize the present mathematics used to measure sustainability. Other important aspects are the dimensions of knowledge and religion (with the emphasis on the importance of happiness) which we reclassify as two important components of culture which form our main focus of this paper. Examples of these new and classical elements of sustainability are partly based on our study inspired by relevant Malay inscriptions and manuscripts of direct and indirect effort of those in power and scholars of sustainability during the pre-Islamic and Islamic era of the Malayonesian civilization. In other words, our new definition of sustainability is proposed in order to improve the present definition and therefore involves the issue of interaction between beings, cultures and religions, together with a comprehensive value-laden mathematical science.
Keywords
References
Alinor, M.b.A.K., 2011. “Penilaian Kritis Muslim terhadap Konsep Utiliti: Ke arah Membangun Ekonomi Kebahagiaan. [Critical Muslim Evaluation on Utility: To¬wards Developing Economics of Happi¬ness]”. Presented at the Seminar Focus, Phuket, Thailand on June 19, 2011. Alinor, M.b.A.K., 2010. “Hubungan Intelektual Terawal Dunia Melayu-Cina” [The Rarliest Intel¬lectual Relationship of Chinese and the Malay World]”. Prasidang Seminar Ke¬bangsaan Banding¬an Melayu-Cina, 25/9/ 2010, UTAR, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. Bartelmus, P., 1980. Economic Development and the Human Environment. Munich, Germany: Weltforum Verlag. Bartelmus, P., 2008. Quantitative Eco-nomics: How Sustainable are Our Economies? N. York: Springer. Beckerman, W., 1992. “Economic Growth and the Environment: Whose Growth? Whose Environment?” World Development, 20(4), 481-496. Beckerman, W., 1994. Sustainable Develop-ment: Is It a Useful Concept?” Environ-mental Values, 3, 191-209. Bruni, L., 2006. Civil Happiness: Economics and Human Flourishing in Historical Per¬spective. London: Routledge Cairns, J. Jr., 2002. “Sustainability and Sacred Values”. Ethics in Science and Environ-mental Politics, 15-27. Available at http://www.int-res.com/articles/esep/2002/ article2.pdf. Accessed in May 4, 2013. Coedes, G. and Dumais, L.C., 1992. Sriwijaya. History, Religion & Language of an Early Malay Polity. Kuala Lumpur: MBRAS. (Transl. of the French book published 1918-1968.) Daly, H.E., 1996. Beyond Growth. Boston, MA: Beacon Daly, H.E. and Farley, J., 2004. Ecological Economics. Washington: Island Press Diener, E. and Seligman, M.E.P., 2004. Be-yond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1-31. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.09.63-7214.2004.00501001. x Duesenberry, J.S., 1949. Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behaviour. Cam-bridge MA: Harvard Univ.Press Easterlin, R., 1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence”. In: P.A. David and M.W. Re¬der, ed., Nations and Households in Eco¬nomic Growth, 89-125. New York: Aca¬demic Press Faber, M., Peterson, T.I., and Schiller, J., 2002. “Homo Oeconomicus and Homo Politikus in Ecological Economics”. Ecolo¬gical Economics, 43, 323-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00279-8 Farzin, Y.H., 2010. “Sustainability, Optimal-ity, and Development Policy”. Review of Development Economics, 14(2), 262-281. Available in http://www.agecon.ucdavis.edu/research/seminars/files/sustainability-optimality-and-development-policy.pdf. Accessed at July 20, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361. 2010.00551.x Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R., 1991. “A New Scientific Methodology for Global En¬vironmental Issues”. In: Costanza, R., ed., Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York: Colombia University Press, 137-152. Galbraith, J.K., 1986. The New Industrial State. 4th ed. New York: Mentor. Gardner, G., 2003. Engaging Religion in the Quest for a Sustainable World. In: Gardner. G., ed., The State of the World 2003. A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress toward a Sustainable Soci¬ety. New York: Norton, 152-176. Gowdy J., 1994. Co-evolutionary Economics: The Economy, Society and the Environ-ment. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Gore, A., 1993. Earth in the Balance. Ecology and the Human Spirit. New York: Plume, Penguin. Gottlieb, R.S., ed., 1996. This Sacred Earth: Religion, Nature, Environment. New York: Routledge Hamilton, C., 2004. Growth Fetish. London: Pluto Hardesty, D.L., 2001. “Archeology”. In: Tolba, M.K., ed., Our Fragile World. Challenges and Opportunities for Sustain¬able Devel¬opment, Vol. II, Section 3: Knowledge, Technology and Management, 1165-1181. Oxford: Eolss. Heer, N., 2008. “A Concise Handlist of Jawi Authors and Their Works”. Available in http://faculty.washington.edu/heer/handlist23.pdf. Accessed at Oct. 24, 2010. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., and O’Brien, G., 2005. “Sustainable Development: Map-ping Different Approaches”. Sustainable Devel¬opment, 13, 38-52. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/sd.244 Hughes, J.D. and Thirgood, J.V., 1982. “De-forestation in Ancient Greece and Rome: A Cause of Collapse”. The Ecologists, 12(5), 196-208. Internet ED. Online Etymology Dictionary. http://etymonline.com/. Accessed at 20 Oct, 2011) Islam, S. M.N.I., 2001. Optimal Growth Eco-nomics, Volume 252: An Investigation of the Contemporary Issues and the Prospect for Sustainable Growth. Amsterdam: North Holland Jacques, C., 1995. Etudes Epigraphiques sur le Pays Cham. Paris: EFEO, 287-289. Jerneck, A., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Andelberg, S., Baier, M., Clark, E., Hickler, T., Horn¬borg, A., Kronsell, A., Lovbrand, E., and Persson, J., 2011. “Structuring Sustai-nability Science”. Sustainability Science, 6 (1), 69-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11625-010-0117-x. Kajikawa, T., 2008. “Research Core and Framework of Sustainability Science”. Sustainability Science, 3 (2), 215-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-008-0053-1. Kapp, K.W., 1950. The Social Cost of Private Enterprise. Boston: Harvard University Press. Kates, R.W., Parris, T.M., and Leserowitz, A.A., 2005. “What is Sustainabale Development? Goals, Indicators, Values and Practice”. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8–21. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/ sustsci/ists/docs/whatisSD_env_kates_0504.pdf. Accessed at July 24, 2010. Kozok, U., 2004. “A 14th Century Malay Manuscript from Kerinci”. Archipel, 67, 37-55. KuPELEMA, 2008. “Unsur-unsur Sains Mate-matik dalam Prasasti dan Manuskrip Rumpun Melayu dalam Bahasa Melayu Sejak Abad Kedua Hingga Ke Sembilan Belas Masehi I. [Elements of Mathe¬ma-tical Sci¬ences in Malayonesian Manus-cripts and Inscriptions in Malay since Second to Nineteenth Century AD]”. Presented at the Seminar Etnomatematik Asia Tenggara I, 2-3 Dec. 2008, organised by INSPEM, Universiti Putra Malaysia. Kuznets, S., 1955. “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”. American Economic Review 45, 1-28. Max-Neef, M., 1995. “Economic Growth and Quality of Life: A Threshold Hypothesis”. Ecological Economics, 15, 115-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(95)00064-x Meadows D.H., Meadows, D.L., and Rand¬ers, J., 1992. Beyond the Limits. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W.W., 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe. Meadows D.H., Randers, J., and Mead¬ows, D.L., 2002 Limits to Growth. The 30-years Update. White River Junction, VT: Chel-sea Green Mishan, E.J., 1993. The Costs of Economic Growth (Rev. ed.) London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. First ed. 1967. Naess A., 1976. “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement, a Sum-mary”. Inquiry, 16, 95-100. Noriah, T., 1999. “Sejarah Sosiolinguistik Ba-hasa Melayu Lama [A History of Socio-linguistics of the Old Malay Language]”. Pulau Pinang: USM. Penrose, R., 1994. Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Con-ciousness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Popper, K., trans., 1968. The Logic of Scien-tific Discovery. 2nd ed. Routledge. Origi-nally in German 1934. Postel, S., 1990. “Toward a New ‘Eco’-Nom-ics”. World-Watch, 3(5), 20-28. Prapanca, 1365. Negarakertagama. Found in 1902 M. Originally in Old Javanese, transl. Into Indonesian Malay and avail¬able at http://maulanusantara.wordpress. com/2008/01/22/kitab-negara-kertagama-terjemahan/. Accessed at Oct. 25, 2011. Ramsey, F.P., 1928. “A Mathematical Theory of Saving”. Economic Journal, 38(152), 543-559. Available in http://folk.uio.no/ gasheim/ zRam1928.pdf. Accessed at Oct. 25, 2011. Redman, C.L., 1999. Human Impact on An-cient Environment. Tucson, AZ: Univer-sity of Arizona Press Sach, I., 1976. “Evironment and Styles of De-velopment”. In: Matthews, W.H., ed., Outer Limits and Human Needs, Uppsala, Swe¬den: Dag Hammarskjold Foundation. Sach, I., 1980. Strategies de l’Ecodevelop-ment. Paris: Editions Ouvrieres. Shaharir b.M.Z., 2002. Pengenalan Sejarah dan Falsafah Sains [Introduc¬tion to a History and Philosophy of Sci¬ence]. 2nd ed. Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Shaharir b.M.Z., 2003. “Some Specific Methodologies of Relating Mathematical Sciences and Islam”. Journal Islamic Science, 19 (1-2), 111-126. Shaharir b.M.Z., 2006. “Pendekatan Baru terhadap Kon¬sep Optimum Barat dan Beberapa Konsep Optimum Baru dalam Acuan Sendiri. [A New Approach in the Western Concept of Optimum and a New Concept of Optimum in Our Own Mould]”. Kesturi, 16 (1&2), 55-96. Shaharir b.M.Z., 2008. “Ekonomi Pemba-ngun¬an Lawan Ekonomi Kebahagiaan. [Econo¬mics of Development Versus Economics of Happiness]”. Jawhar. Jurnal Kajian Ketamadunan, 5(1), 1-45. Shaharir b.M.Z., 2009a. “Teori Kepemim¬pin-an Melayu-Campa. [A Theory of Champa-Malay Leadership]”. Kesturi, 19 (1&2), 117-131 (originally presented at the Seminar Anta¬rabangsa Tamadun Campa 2005, Univer¬siti Kebangsaan Malaysia). Shaharir b.M.Z., 2009b. “Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Ilmu: Telah, La-ni dan Kelak [Malay Language as a Language of Knowledge: Past, Present and the Future]”. Jurnal Peradaban 2, 21-66. Shaharir b.M.Z., 2010a. Pembinaan Semula Teori Ke¬pemimpinan dan Kepengurusan Rumpun Melayu [A Recons¬truction of the theory of Malayonesian Leadership and Managerialship]. 2nd ed. Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia: Universiti Malay-sia Terengganu. Shaharir b.M.Z., 2010b. A Critique on Para-digms in Optimization and Sustainability. In: Conference on Values and Sustaina-bility, organised by Pusat Dialog Pera-daban, Univ. Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 21-22 Dec. 2010. Shaharir b.M.Z., 2011. Kepemimpinan Tok Guru Nik Aziz Mengikut Pandangan Sarjana Ke¬pemimpinan Besar Sepanjang Zaman [Leadership of Tok Guru Nik Aziz according to the Opinion of Great Schol-ars of all Ages on Leadership]. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: Kaab Enterprise. Shaharir b.M.Z. and Alinor, M.b.A.K., 2011. “Keperihatinan Pemimpin dan Sarjana Rumpun Melayu Silam terhadap Keter-lestarian [Old Malayonesian Leaders and Scholars Concern on Sustainability]”. Mimeograph Pusat Dialog Peradaban, Univ. Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Sideris, L., 2007. “Evolving Environmental-ism: The Role of Ecotheology in Crea-tion/Evolution Controversies”. World-views: Global Religions. Culture and Ecology, 11 (1), 58-82. Singer, M., 2010. “Economics: Are the Planet-unfriendly Features of Capitalism Barriers to Sustainability?” Sustainability, 2 (1), 127-144.http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su2010127 Smorch, P., 2010. “Optimization and Sustain-ability–A Winning Combination”. GCI Magazine. AvaIlable in http://www. gcimagazine.com/business/manufacturing/supplychain/86257672.html. Accessed at July 25, 2011. Sustainability Now, 2006. “Wellbeing of Na-tions, Background”. Available in http:// 66.51.174.6/SustainabilityNow/index.cfm?body=SourceView.cfm&ID=422. Accessed at Oct 20, 2012. Sutrisna W., 2010. “Maintaining the Envi-ronmental Preservation According to the Ancient Javanese Manuscript Serat Centhini”. In: Latif A.b.S., Hamdzun, H., Khalim, Z., Nazri, M., and Zarina, O., ed. Pros. Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains dan Teknologi di Alam Melayu, 15-17 Dec. 2010. 482-487. Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia: ATMA, Univ. Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Tonn, B.E., 2007. “Futures Sustainability”. Futures, 39(9), 1097-1116. Van Ronkel, Ph.S., 1924. “A Preliminary Notice Concerning Two Old Malay In-scriptions in Palembang (Sumatra)”. Acta Orientalia, 2, 12-21. Venetoulis, JD. Chazau, D., and Gaudet, C., 2004. “Sustainable Indicators Program. Redefining Progres”. Available in http:// www.globalchange.umich.edu/ globalchange2/current/labs/ecofoot/footprintnations2004 pdf. WCED (World Commision on Environment and Development), 1987. Our Common Future . Oxford: OUP White A., 2010. “Religious Environmentalism as a Vital Contribution to Sustainability”. Journal of Enterprising Communities: Peo¬ple and Places in the Global Economy, 4(3), 268-278. White, L., 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis”. Science, 155, 1203-1207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 155.3767.1203
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.29761
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 4177
| 
views : 1775
| views : 2552
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
| Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business |
| The Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (print ISSN 2085-8272; online ISSN 2338-5847) is published by the Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |
| © 2019 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business | Visitor Statistics |