THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL CAPITAL ON WELFARE IN INDONESIA

https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.29219

Jumirah Jumirah(1), Heni Wahyuni(2*)

(1) The Bureau of Economy Administration and Natural Resources, The Yogyakarta Provincial Office
(2) Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Studies into the impact of social capital on welfare are currently growing. However, studies for the case of the developing countries, including Indonesia, are still very rare. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze the impact of social capital on welfare in Indonesia. In this study, social capital is measured by three indicators, namely, trust, cooperativeness and the social network (a person’s participation in community activities).Welfare is measured by household expenditure for food and non-food items. The data are acquired from the Indonesian Family Life Surveys for the years 2007 (IFLS4) and 2014 (IFLS5). This research uses instrumental variables to address the endogeneity issue on social networking (participation in community activities), which is a potential two-way causal relationship. It means that individuals with higher welfare (income) have a higher possibility of participating in community activities, since their participation in community activities is a leisure activity and the utilization of leisure is higher for higher-income people.Using the Instrumental Variables (IV) method and marital status as an instrument, the study found that social capital has a significant impact on welfare. An increased participation in community activities will improve ones welfare by 11.7 percent. Moreover, an increase of cooperativeness by one percent, would increase the welfare by 0.2 percent. On the other hand, trust has a negative relationship with welfare. It means that an increase in trust among individuals by one percent will cause household expenditure on food and non-food items to drop by 0.3 percent.It may imply that higher trust will cause lower transaction costs, which will reduce the expense of individuals buying food and non-food items. Since the coefficient of IV is larger than the coefficient in the OLS estimation, it indicates the absence of reversed causality. The results of this study have an implication for policy decision making which suggests that the policy decision makers should consider the impact of social capital on welfare and support the increase of individuals’ participating in community activities.


Keywords


Social Capital, Welfare , Instrumental Variable (IV), Endogeneity, IFLS

Full Text:

Jumirah & Wahyuni


References

Adepoju, A. A., & Oni, O. A. (2012). Investigating endogeneity effects of social capital on household welfare in Nigeria: A control function approach. Quarterly Jour­nal of International Agriculture, 51(1), 73.

Beard, V. A. (2005). Individual determinants of participation in community development in Indonesia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(1), 21-39.

Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge university press.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, S95-S120.

Dasgupta, P., & Serageldin, I. (Eds.). (2001). Social capital: A multifaceted perspective. World Bank Publications.

Dasgupta, P. (2002). Social capital and economic performance: Analytics. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics.

Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20.

Gomez, T. B., Fuch, A. & Perdana, A. (2006). Better together or not? Community participation, consumption smoothing and household head employment in Indonesia. East Asian Bureau of Economic Research, No. 21814.

Grootaert, C. (1999). Social capital, household welfare, and poverty in Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2148.

Krishna, A., & Shrader, E. (1999, June). Social capital assessment tool. In Conference on social capital and poverty reduction (Vol. 2224).

Mayoral, L., (2015). IV estimation and its limitations: Weak instruments and weakly endogeneous regressors. Retrived from http:// mayoral. iaecsic. Org / IV _ 2015 / IV Got_lecture3.pdf.

Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic development and cultural change, 47(4), 871-897.

Nasution, A., Rustiadi, E., Juanda, B., & Hadi, S. (2014). Dampak modal sosial terhadap kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga Perdesaan di Indonesia [The impact of social capital against the welfare of rural households in Indonesia]. MIMBAR, Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 30(2), 137-148.

Pangaribowo, E. H. (2012, April). Intrahousehold power: The role of women’s share of asset and social capital on household food and nonfood expenditures. In 86th Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2012, Warwick University, Coventry, UK (No. 135521). Agricultural Economics Society.

Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.

Sobal, J., & Hanson, K. (2010). Marital status and physical activity in US adults. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 181-198.

Stock, J. H., and Yogo, M., 2002. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV Regression. NBER Technical Working Paper No. 284.

Tampubolon, G. (2007, June). Capitalist crises, social capital and well-being. In Poverty and Capital Conference.

Wetterberg, A. (2005). Crisis, social ties, and household welfare: Testing social capital theory with evidence from Indonesia. World Bank Office, Jakarta.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Introductory econome­trics: A modern approach. Nelson Education.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.29219

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 340 | views : 275

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

___________________________________________________________________________

The Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (JIEB)
is published by

Faculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jalan Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Yogyakarta, DIY 55281, Indonesia
E-mail:     jieb@ugm.ac.id
Tel:        +62 274 548510, Ext. 127
Mobile:   +62 8112822260 (SMS/WA/Telegram)
Website: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/jieb


ISSN 2338-5847 (online)
ISSN 2085-8272 (print)
ISSN 0215-2487 (previous)

______________________________________________________________________________________

The Journal of Indonesian Economy and Buiness is indexed by

DOAJ  Proquest         Google Scholar  Worldcat    Indonesian Publication
Index (IPI)  crossref           onesearch Indonesian Scientific Journal Database (ISJD)  
 
 
 Creative Commons License

The copyright is reserved to the Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business that is licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

web
stats View My Stats