Pritish Kumar Sahu(1*)

(1) Multimedia University
(*) Corresponding Author


Introduction: Indonesia has signed, and is in the process of signing, many bilateral and regional Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). Whether these trade agreements will benefit Indonesia on the economic front or not is still a matter for discussion. Background Problem: Signing TPP, raises many questions as to how this would affect the countries in Asian regions, including Indonesia. Novelty: Considering the criticism of CGE (Computer General Equilibrium) model, this paper uses the SMART simulation model, based on a partial equilibrium approach, to estimate the aggregate and commodity-level gains and losses for Indonesia with its partner countries during the post-tariff elimination period. Research Method: This study uses the World Bank’s World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) Database. This database contains trade data for all the countries under a different nomenclature viz. at the two-digit, four-digit, and six-digit level. We use the HS-classified nomenclature at the six-digit level in order to estimate the impact of the removal of tariffs on Indonesia’s trade, i.e. both exports and imports. Findings: The finding reveals that if Indonesia does not take part in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, it will still have a trade surplus of $1.6 billion with the Trans-Pacific countries but joining the bloc would result in a trade deficit of $19 million. Joining the bloc would increase the imports from Japan, followed by the United States and Australia as against an increase in exports to the United States, followed by Malaysia and Vietnam. The post Trans-Pacific Partnership period will have many implications for Indonesia, it may face difficulties exporting to the member countries, even with an existing trade agreement, while in the long run the Trans-Pacific Partnership bloc could limit Indonesia’s trade prospects with these Pacific Rim countries and it may limit Indonesia influencing WTO outcomes. Conclusion: Trade agreements seem to have benefited Indonesia’s economy and its people in many ways over the years, even though it has an important cost for some people.


TPP; Trade; Simulation; Tariff elimination.

Full Text:



Banga, R., & Sahu, P. K. (2015). Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA): Implications for India’s trade and investments. Center for WTO Studies Working Paper, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade. CWS/WP/200/24.

Banga, R. (2014). Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA): Implications for Vietnam’s domestic value-added trade. Center for WTO Studies Working Paper, CWS/WP/200/ 19.

Banga, R. (2015). Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA): Implications for Malaysia’s domestic value-added trade. Center for WTO Studies Working Paper, CWS/WP/200/ 18.

Bergsten, F. C. (2015). India’s rise: A strategy for trade led growth. Trade and investment policy watch, Petersons Institute for International Economics, PIIE Briefing 15-4.

Bertram, G. & Simon, T. (2014). Economic gains and costs from the TPP. Sustainability Council of New Zealand. February.

Chandra Alexander C. (2006). Indonesia and bilateral trade agreements. The Pacific Review. vol. 6(1), 1-28.

Charlton, A.H. & Stiglitz, J.E. (2005). A development-friendly prioritization of Doha round proposals. The World Economy, 28 (3), 293-312.

Cheong I. (2013) Negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Evaluation and implications for East Asian regionalism, ADBI Working Paper 428, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2292899 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2292899

Chow D.C.K. (2016). How the United States use the Trans-Pacific Partnership to contain China in international trade, Chicago Journal of International Law, 17(2), 370-402.

Cororation C. B. & David O. (2015). Potential economic effects on the Philippines of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Global Issues Initiative, Working Paper No. 2014-1.

Deardorff, A. V. 2013. Trade implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for ASEAN and other Asian countries. Asian Development Review Conference, 01-02 August 2013, Manila.

Feridhanusetiawan T & Pangestu M.(2004). Indonesian Trade Liberalization: Estimating the Gains. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39 (1), 51-74.

Gajdos, L. (2013). The Trans-Pacific Partnership and its impact on EU trade. Directorate-General for External Policies, Policy Briefing, Report no DGEXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2013_3.

Goeltom, M. S. (2007). Economic and fiscal reforms: The experience of Indonesia 1980–1996. In Essays in Macroeconomic Policy: The Indonesian Experience, PT Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta, 489–506.

Kenichi, K. (2011). Determining priority among EPAs: Which trading partner has the greatest economic impact? Research Institute of Economic, Trade and Industry. Retrieved from http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/columns/a01_0318.html

Panagariya, A. & Duttagupta. (2001). The ‘gains’ from preferential trade liberalization in the CGEs: Where do they come from? In S. Lahiri, ed., Regionalism and Globalization: Theory and Practice, Routledge, pp.39-60.

Pangestu M. Rahardja S. & Ing Y.L. (2015). Fifty years of trade policy in Indonesia: New World trade, old treatments. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51(2), 239-261.

Petri, P. A. & Michael G. P. (2012). The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific integration: policy implications. Peterson Institute of International Economics, Policy Briefs, No. PB12-16.

Petri P. A., Plummer M.G. & Zhai F. (2011). The Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Asia-Pacific integration: A quantitative assessment. East- West Centre Working Paper, Economic Series No. 119.

Petri Peter A. & Plummer M. G. (2016) The economic effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: new estimates. Working Paper, 16-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Raza, W., Grumiller, J, Taylor, L., Tröster, B. & Arnim, R. V. (2014). Assess TTIP: Assessing the claimed benefits of the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. Austrian Foundation for Development Research.

Sahu P.K. (2016). Trans-Pacific Partnership: Should Indonesia join it or not? Insight, The Jakarta Post, February 18, Indonesia.

Soesastro H. & Basri M.C. (2005). The political economy of trade policy in Indonesia. Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Economics Working Paper Series. WPE092.

Suryahadi A. Hadiwidjaja G. & Sumarto S. (2012). Economic growth and poverty reduction in Indonesia before and after the Asian financial crisis. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic studies, 48 (2), 209-227.

Taylor, L. & Arnim, R. V. (2006). Computable general equilibrium models of trade liberalization: The Doha Debate. Mimeo, New School for Social Research. Oxford: Oxfam GB.

Tokarick, S. (2005) Who bears the cost of agricultural support in OECD countries? World Economy, 28(4), 573–93.

Trade Policy Review (2012), World Trade Organisation World Bank.

Wits (2014), SMART Manual, World Integrated Trade Solution, World Bank.

World Bank Database (2017). World Bank Open Data. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/

World Trade Organisation. (2013). Trade Policy Review-2013, Report by the Secretariat, Indonesia, Trade Policy Review Body.

Xin, Li. (2014). A general equilibrium analysis of the TPP free trade agreement with and without China, The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 8(2), 115-136.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.28252

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2746 | views : 2546


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business


Editorial Team
Focus and Scope
Peer Review Process
Publication Ethics
Screening for Plagiarism


Author Guidelines
Submission Guidelines
Online Submissions
Copyright Notice
Privacy Statement
Author Fees


Author Pack
Submission Form & Manuscript Template



Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewer Acknowledgement



General Search
Author index
Title index



The Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (print ISSN 2085-8272; online ISSN 2338-5847) is published by the Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

© 2019 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business 
 Visitor Statistics