Social Science Research in Southeast Asia: the Challenges of Studying Parliamentary Institutions

https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v2i2.40814

Ratih Adiputri(1*)

(1) University of Jyväskylä, Finland
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper introduces the challenges of studying parliamentary institutions in Southeast Asia. My focus of research is in three countries’ institutions: national parliaments of Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. While in Southeast Asia, it is widely known that studying issues of politics and institutions face challenges – compared to studying culture, for example, this view is arguably no longer valid, however with certainqualification.

The comparison of parliamentary tradition between three countries – based on observation of the plenary session - reveals that the effectiveness of parliamentary works is related to parliamentary procedure, and even to the culture of work in the countries. Parliamentary structure, procedure and their political culture matters. Therefore, acknowledging these factors will give rise to more research opportunities, if a researcher plans to study the political institution in other countries in Southeast Asia.


Keywords


Social Science Research, Southeast Asia, Parliament, Procedure, Political Culture, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adiputri, R. 2015. Political culture in the Indonesian Parliament : Analyzing parliamentary debates on the regional parliaments 1999- 2009. (PhD Dissertation) University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved fromhttp://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-6248-7

Allison, Laura. 2015. The EU, ASEAN and Interregionalism : Regionalism Support and Norm Diffusion between the EU and ASEAN. UK:Palgrave Macmillan (ProQuest Ebook Central).

Aspinall, Edward. 2014. ‘Parliament and Patronage’. Journal of Democracy, vol. 25, no. 4, October, 96-110.

Beng-Lan, Goh, 2011. ‘Disciplines and Area Studies in the Global Age:Southeast Asian Reflections’ in Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the region, edited by Goh Beng-Lan. Singapore: ISEAS, 1-59.

Blackburn, Robert, and Kennon, Andrew. 2003. Parliament: Functions, Practices and Procedures. London: Sweet and Maxwell.

Blommaert, Jan. 2006. Ethnographic fieldwork: a Beginner's guide,available in https://www.jyu.fi/hum/laitokset/kielet/tutkimus/ hankkeet/paattyneet-hankkeet/fidipro/en/courses/fieldwork-text, accessed on 3.12.2013

Case, William. 2009. “Low-quality democracy and varied authoritarianism: elites and regimes in Southeast Asia today” in The Pacific Review, 22:3, 255-269.

__________. 2002. Politics in Southeast Asia: Democracy or Less. London: Routledge.

Crewe, Emma. 2016. “Ethnography of Parliament: Finding Culture and Politics Entangled in the Commons and the Lords”. Parliamentary Affairs. 1-18.

Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. 2018. Alat Kelengkapan. Published at http:// www.dpr.go.id/alatkelengkapan

Gungwu, Wang, 2011. ‘Post-Imperial Knowledge and Pre-Social Science in Southeast Asia’ in Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the region, edited by Goh Beng-Lan. Singapore: ISEAS, 60-80.

Halib, Mohammed and Tim Huxley. 1996. ‘Introduction’ in An Introduction to Southeast Asian Studies, edited by Mohammed Halib and Tim Huxley. London: Tauris, 1-9.

Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

King, Victor T. 2014. “Southeast Asian Studies: the Conundrum of Area and Method” in Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies, edited by Mikko Huotari, Jürgen Rüland and Judith Schlehe. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire, 44-63.

Lemière, Sophie. 2018. “The Downfall of Malaysia’s Ruling Party” inJournal of Democracy, vol. 29, number 4. October, 114-128. McCargo, Duncan and Robert H. Taylor. 1996. ‘Politics’ in An Introduction

to Southeast Asian Studies, edited by Mohammed Halib and Tim

Huxley. London: Tauris, 209-223.
McCargo, Duncan. 2006. ‘Rethinking Southeast Asian Politics’ in

Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Direction, edited by Cynthia Chou and Vincent Houben. The Netherlands: IIAS, 102- 122.

Moser, Sarah. 2008. “Personality: A new Positionality?” in Area, Vol. 40, No. 3 (Sep), 383-392.

Neher, Clark D. 1994. “Asian Style Democracy” in Asian Survey, vol. 34. No. 11, 949-961.

Narine, Shaun. 2008. “Forty years of ASEAN: a historical review” in ThePacific Review, 21: 4, 411-429.

Palonen, Kari. 2014. The Politics of Parliamentary Procedure. The Formation of the Westminster Procedure as a Parliamentary Ideal Type. Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

Parlimen Malaysia. 2018. Jawatan kuasa Pemilih-Dewan Rakyat.Published at (http://www.parlimen.gov.my/jawatankuasa-dr. html?uweb=dr&&view=51)

Parliament of Singapore. 2018. Select Committees. Published at https:// www.parliament.gov.sg/about-us/structure/select-committees

Rüland, Jürgen and Carrapatoso, Astrid. 2015. “Democratizing inter- regionalism: The EU parliament and its Asia relations” in The European parliament and its international relations, edited by Stelios Stavridis and Daniela Irrera. New York: Routledge, 197-219.

Rüland, Jürgen. 2013. “Participation without Democratization: the ASEAN Inter-parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) and ASEAN’s Regional Corporatism” in Parliamentary Dimensions of Regionalization and Globalization: The Role of Inter-Parliamentary Institutions,edited by Oliver Costa, Clarissa Dri and Stelios Stavridis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

__________. 2012. “Introduction to the First Four Articles: Governance, Decentralization and Democratisation in Southeast Asia” inEuropean Journal of East Asian Studies/ EJEAS 11, 5-16.

__________. 2006. Southeast Asia: New Research Trends in Political Science and International Relations. Südostasien aktuell:journal of current Southeast Asian affairs, 25(4), 83-107. Retrieved from http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-337213

__________. 2001. “ASEAN and the European Union: A Bumpy Interregional Relationship” in ZEI (Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung) Discussion Paper C95, Center for European Integration Studies, University of Bonn.

Sanders, Elizabeth. 2006. “Historical Institutionalism” in The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by RAW Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder and Bert A. Rockman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39-56.

Sillander, Kenneth. 2010. Fieldwork at the margins of Indonesia underSuharto's New Order regime. Course lecture of “Fieldwork Methods in Indonesian Studies”, recorded from the Asian Studies Day, University of Turku.

Ziegenhain, Patrick. 2008. The Indonesian parliament and democratization. Singapore: ISEAS.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v2i2.40814

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 739 | views : 614

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ratih Adiputri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats