Too Many Meanings: Contestation of Lawang Sewu as a Heritage Tourism Attraction

https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajts.v1i2.47475

Uswatun Nurul(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Tourism industry utilizes heritage as a tourist attraction. Not only the physical existences, but also the meaning of its heritage, particularly its narrations, are used to gain profit for tourism industry. Lawang Sewu located in Semarang, Indonesia is one heritage which is used by PT KeretaApi Indonesia (PT KAI) as a heritage tourism attraction. This research analyses many meanings or narrations of Lawang Sewu as a heritage tourism attraction. This research has three objectives. First, it aims to identify the meaning of BPCB Central Java, PT KAI, local people, tour guides and tourist interpretations of Lawang Sewu. Second, it aims to discover which stakeholder dominates the narrations presented in Lawang Sewu. Third, it seeks to understand how the dominant stakeholder can govern the narrations. This research is a qualitative research with inductive reasoning. Through the use of interactive analysis model as the data analysis method and hermeneutics approach to draw the conclusion, this research finds that each stakeholder construes the meaning of Lawang Sewu differently. Among the interpretations, PT KAI is the dominant stakeholder found in the presentation of Lawang Sewu to tourists.


Keywords


Heritage tourism attraction; interpretation dominance; Lawang Sewu

Full Text:

PDF


References

Brommer, B., Sidharta, A., Budihardjo, E., Siswanto, A., Montens, A. B., Soewarno, S. S., & Stevens, T. 1995. Semarang, Beeld van een stad. Nederland: Asia Major.

Byrne, D., Brayshaw, H. and Ireland, T. 2003. Social significance: a discussion paper. New South Wales: National Parks and Wildlife Service.

Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1996. Truth and Method (2nd rev. ed., Joel Weinshemer& Donald Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

Hall, S. 1997. “The Work of Representation” in Stuart Hall (Ed.) Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices Vol. 2. London: Sage Publications, pp. 13-74.

Hodder, Ian. 1998. “The past as passion and play Catalhoyuk as a site of conflict in the construction of multiple pasts” in Lynn Meskell (Ed.) Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge, pp. 124-139.

Kelly, Catherine. 2009. “Heritage” in Thrift, Nigel and Kitchin, Rob, (Eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. London: Elsevier, pp. 91-97.

Kinsella, E. A. 2006. “Hermeneutics and and Critical Hermeneutics: Exploring Possibilities Within the Art of Interpretation” in Forum Qualitative Socialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research Vol. 7. No. 3, pp. 13-20.

Klinkhamer & Ouendag. 1916. “Het Administraiegebouw der Nederlandsch-Indische Spoorweg Maatschappij te Semarang”. Nederlands-Indie Oud en Nieuw vol 1, Issue 1. pp. 23-31.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. 2014. Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. Mason, R. 2002. “Assessing Valuies in Conservation Planning: Methodoligical Issues and Choices” in Marta de la Torre (Ed.) Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. California: The Getty Conservation Institutem, pp.5-49. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. 2013. Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications. Nuryanti, W. 1996. “Heritage and Postmodern Tourism”. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), pp.249-260. Odman, P.J. 1988. “Hermeneutics” in John P Keeves inEducational research methodology and measurement: An international handbook. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 63-70. Puczkó, L.A.S.Z.L.O. 2006. “Interpretation in cultural tourism” in Smith, M. & Robinson, M (ed.) Cultural Tourism in a Changing World: Politics, Participation and (re) presentation. Bristol: Channel View Publications, pp.227-244. Rátz, T. 2006. “Interpretation in the house of terror, Budapest” in Smith, M. & Robinson, M (ed.) Cultural tourism in a changing world: Politics, participation and (re) presentation. Bristol: Channel View Publications, pp.244-56. Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. Y. 1992. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. London: Routledge. Sudarmadi, T. 2014. Between colonial legacies and grassroots movements: exploring cultural heritage practice in the Ngadha and Manggarai Region of Flores.Dissertation, Vrije Univeristy Amsterdam. Throsby, D. 1999. Cultural capital. Journal of cultural economics, 23(1-2), pp.3-12. Vecco, M. 2010. A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(3), pp.321-332. Wright, A.C. and Lennon, J.J. 2007. Selective interpretation and eclectic human heritage in Lithuania. Tourism Management, 28(2), pp.519- 529.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajts.v1i2.47475

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 921 | views : 1639

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Gadjah Mada Journal of Tourism Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web Analytics View My Stats

Print ISSN: 2621-9522 | Online ISSN: 2621-9948
Copyright © 2024 Gadjah Mada Journal of Tourism Studies, Office of Journal & Publishing, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada