Evaluasi program trias usaha kesehatan sekolah dan perilaku hidup bersih dan sehat di sekolah luar biasa Bantul

https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.8579

Rahmah Widyaningrum(1*), Mei Neni Sitaresmi(2), Lely Lusmilasari(3)

(1) Departemen Keperawatan Anak dan Maternitas Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Anak Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Departemen Keperawatan Anak dan Maternitas Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Evaluation of triage programs school health unit and clean and health living behavior in school for children with special educational needs Bantul

Purpose

This study aimed to get an overview of school health unit and implementation of clean and health living behavior in school for children with special educational needs.

Methods

This research used qualitative methods with a case study approach. Participants of the study included the principal, the teacher, students and public health center staff, the senior managers of the school, and the Yogyakarta provincial youth and sports education department. Qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies.

Results

The implementation of trias school health unit program was in the good category. Some clean and health living indicators were still in low category. The obstacles of the school health unit and clean and health living behavior program implementation were limited understanding of students, low coverage of teacher and school training, economic conditions and parental attitudes, school readiness, and involvement of relevant agencies. Factors affecting school health unit implementation included curriculum, school organization, and partnership.

Conclusion

The implementation of school health unit and clean and health can be enhanced through partnership optimization with community health centers, related offices, non-governmental organizations, and education and health universities.


Keywords


implementation of trias health school unit; clean and health living behavior; school for children with special educational needs



References

  1. Kemendikbud. Pedoman pembinaan dan pengembangan usaha kesehatan sekolah. Jakarta. 2012.
  2. Lorhmann, DK. A complementary ecologi model of the coordinates school health program, Journal of school health. Vol 123(1):695-701. 2009.
  3. Lee A, Wong MC, Keung VM, Yuen HS, Cheng F, Mok JS. Can the concept of Health Promoting Schools help to improve students' health knowledge and practices to combat the challenge of communicable diseases: Case study in Hong Kong?. BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec;8(1):42.
  4. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health promotion international. 2000 Sep 1;15(3):259-67.
  5. Cushman, P. Health Promoting Schools: a New Zealand Perspective. 2008.
  6. Depkes RI. Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Monitoring. Evaluasi dan Pelaporan Usaha Kesehatan Sekolah, Jakarta. 2006.
  7. Huberman, AM, Miles, M.B. Manajemen Data dan Metode Analisis di dalam Denzin, N.K dan Lincoln, Y.S. Handbook of Qualitatif Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2009.
  8. Simovska V. The changing meanings of participation in school-based health education and health promotion: the participants' voices. Health Education Research. 2007 Jun 25;22(6):864-78.
  9. Nadesul, H. Lifebuoy Health Institute di Kidzania Budayakan Perilaku Hidup Bersih & Sehat untuk Anak-anak, PT Unilever, Jakarta. 2011
  10. St Leger L, Nutbeam D. Research into health promoting schools. The Journal of school health. 2000 Aug 1;70(6):257.
  11. Wyllie A, Postlethwaite J, Casey E. Health Promoting Schools in Northern region: Overview of evaluation findings of pilot project. Auckland,, New Zealand: Phoenix Research; 2000 Jun.
  12. Turunen H, Tossavainen K, Jakonen S, Vertio H. Did something change in health promotion practices? A three‐year study of Finnish European Network of Health Promoting Schools. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice. 2006 Dec 1;12(6):675-92.
  13. Leurs MT, Bessems K, Schaalma HP, De Vries H. Focus points for school health promotion improvements in Dutch primary schools. Health education research. 2006 Jun 9;22(1):58-69.
  14. Pommier J, Guével MR, Jourdan D. Evaluation of health promotion in schools: a realistic evaluation approach using mixed methods. BMC public health. 2010 Dec;10(1):43.
  15. Henderson AT, Mapp KL. A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family, and Community Connections on Student Achievement. Annual Synthesis, 2002.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.8579

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 578 | views : 1197

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat ISSN 0215-1936 (PRINT), ISSN: 2614-8412 (ONLINE).

Indexed by:


Web
Analytics Visitor Counter