PREDICTION OF WELL BEHAVIOR USING WELL DELIVERABILITY ANALYSIS

https://doi.org/10.22146/ajse.v2i1.4965

Dewi Asmorowati(1*), M. Waziz Wildan(2), Khasani -(3)

(1) 
(2) 
(3) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


In operating geothermal field, the thing to note is the sustainable production as well as problems that affect it. The problem that often occurs in the geothermal field is scale, corrosion and mechanical problems. One technique that can be used to predict the problems that occur around the bottom hole to the surface is using the well deliverability analysis method. Analysis is done by data and curve interpretation of deliverability curve based on Grant experiment. This study take data from several wells in two Geothermal Field in Indonesia. From the analysis, well A, D and F show production decline The deliverability curve of well A shows the production decline for about 60 – 85%, it is caused by moving of the flashing point, it shows from the increasing of dryness value from 7-14% in 1997 become 13-15% in 2010. The deliverability curve of well D shows the production decline for about 50%, it is caused by declining of reservoir pressure that can be seen from the decreasing  of feed zone pressure in 1997 is 27 bar and in 2010 is 20 bar. The deliverability curve of well F shows the production decline for about 29%, it is caused by moving  of the flashing point.

Keywords


well deliverability; well sim; production decline; scale



References

Abdillah, Mu’thi, 2008, Evaluasi Penurunan Produksi Sumur di Lapangan Panas Bumi X, Program Studi Teknik Perminyakan Fakultas Teknik Pertambangan Dan Perminyakan, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Axelsson, Gudni, 2013, Geothermal Well Testing, Short Course V on Conceptual Modelling of Geothermal Systems, UNU-GTP and LaGeo, in Santa Tecla, El Salvador

Brown, G.O., 2002, Henry Darcy and the Making of Law, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University.

Elmi, Daher, 2005, Analysis of Geothermal Well Test Data From The Asal Rift Area, Republic of Djibouti, Geothermal Training Programme, The United Nation University, Iceland.

Grant, Malcolm A.; Donaldson, Ian G.; Bixley, Paul F., 1982, Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, A Subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Javanovich Publisher, New York, London.

Gudjonsdottir, Maria; Eliasson, Jonas; Axelsson, Gudni; Palsson, Halldor and Saevarsdottir, Gudrun, 2012, Effect Of Flow Configuration On The Relative Permeabilities Of Water And Steam In Two Phase Flow In Geothermal Reservoirs, Proceedings, Thirty-Seventh Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California

Khasani, 2002, Study on Well Deliverability Using Wellbore Model Coupled with Radial Flow in Reservoir, Department of Earth Resources Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Khyusu University.

Menzies, Anthony J., 1982, Flow Characteristics and Relative Permeability Functions for Two Phase Geothermal Reservoirs from a One Dimensional Thermodynamic Model, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Stanford University.

Orkiszewski, J., 1967, Predicting Two-Phase Pressure Drops in Vertical Pipe, Journal of Petroleum Technology.

Villaluz, Anson L., 2005, Relative Permeability of Fracture Rock, Stanford Geothermal Program, Stanford University.

Vivar, Jesus de LeOn, 1988, Deliverability Of Geothermal Reservoirs, The United Nations University, Geothermal Training Programme Reykjavik, Iceland Report 2.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ajse.v2i1.4965

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 841

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)




ASEAN Journal of Systems Engineering (AJSE) 
P-ISSN: 2338-2309 || E-ISSN: 2338-2295
Master in Systems Engineering
Faculty of Engineering
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jl. Teknika Utara No.3, Barek, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 
Website: https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ajse
Email: jurnalajse@gmail.com | ajse@ugm.ac.id