Analisis Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Kabupaten Magelang

https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v5i3.59277

Nita Safitri(1*), Abdul Halim(2)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Departemen Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


SPIP or Government Internal Control System is an integral processes on every action and activity which done continuously by managers and personnels to give adequate assurance of organization goals achievements. SPIP achievements depends on APIP or Government Internal Supervision Agency’s effectivity. One of many methods to create an effective APIP is by constructing general pattern of capability development which adopted from Internal Audit Capability Model (IACM). IACM consist of internal audit’s fundamental aspects which describes steps to achieve evolutionary five levels on six core internal audit elements.On 2015 Internal Supervision Coordinasion Conference The President of Indonesia entrusted that 85% of APIP will have achieve level 3 in 2019. BPKP representative in Special Region of Yogyakarta 2016 third terms results on monitoring capability of it’s 12 local governments partner for shows that APIP Kabupaten Magelang capability comes last. APIP Kabupaten Magelang overall capability only meet level 1 because 5 elements are stil on level 1. This research was constructed to analyze causal factors of APIP Kabupaten Magelang capability outpaced.This research was conducted by qualitative paradigm, case-study approach and benchmarking method with APIP Kabupaten Bantul and APIP Kabupaten Gunung Kidul. There were two kind of analysis steps: capability reports benchmarking to find APIP Kabupaten Magelang weaknesses, continued with interview trancsriotions analysis to find the causal factors. This research found six causal factors for outpaced APIP Kabupaten Magelang Capability spesifically: audit quantity, administration, IACM comprehension, risk-based planning, non-audit budget, and motivation.

Keywords


Abis, Abisugm, Abismaksi, Maksi, Maksiugm, Feb, Febugm, ugm,Kapabilitas, Inspektorat, IACM, faktor penyebab

Full Text:

PDF


References

Anand, G. dan Rambabu Kodali. 2008. “Benchmarking the Benchmarking Models.” Benchmarking: An International Journal Vol 15 Issue 3 pp. 257-291. Diakses pada 22 November 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635770810876593Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. Peraturan Kepala BPKP Kep-971/K/SU/2005 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Formasi Jabatan Fungsional Auditor di Lingkungan APIP-----. Peraturan Kepala BPKP Nomor 16 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Teknis Peningkatan Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah.-----. Keputusan Kepala BPKP Nomor PER-1633/K/JF/2011 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Teknis Peningkatan Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah.Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan Perwakilan Provinsi D.I.Yogyakarta. Rencana Strategis 2015-2019 BPKP perwakilan Provinsi D.I.Yogyakarta.pdf. Diakses pada 5 September 2016. http://www.bpkp.go.id/public/upload/unit/diy/files/Renstra/REnstra%202015-2019%20BPKP%20DIY.pdf-----. 2015. Hasil Evaluasi (Assessment) Penerapan Tata Kelola APIP di Lingkungan Inspektorat Kabupaten Magelang. LEV-131/PW12/6/2015 tanggal 13 Oktober 2015-----. 2016. Laporan Pemantauan Perkembangan Peningkatan Kapabilitas APIP pada BPKP Perwakilan DIY Triwulan III 2016. LAP-328/PW12/6/2016 tanggal 14 Juli 2016. Cresswell, John W.. 2014. Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications. Calfornia.Cresswell, John W.. 2014. Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications. Calfornia.Hennink, M., Hutter, I. dan Bailey, A., 2010. Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications. Calfornia.Kalembu, Clotilda. D. S., dan Rusdi Akbar, P. hD. (2016). Evaluasi Peran Inspektorat Kabupaten Sumba Barat Daya Sebagai Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah. Tesis S2 Magister Akuntansi Universitas Gadjah Mada. Diakses pada 28 September 2016.Macrae, Elizabeth. 2011. “Internal Audit Capability Model (IA-CM) A Tool For Going Beyond Compliance” Presentasi, IAS Conference, 3 Oktober. Diakses pada 22 November 2016 dari https://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/internal-audit-serviceMoriarty, John P. dan Clive Smallman. 2009. En route to a theory of benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 16 Iss 4 pp. 484 – 503. Diakses pada 22 November 2016 dari http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635770910972423Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah.Situs Resmi BPKP 2016. Rakornas APIP. Diakses pada 1 September 2016 dari http://www.bpkp.go.id/konten/2338/rakorn.The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. 2009. Internal Audit Capability Model (IACM) for the Public Sector - Internal Audit Capability Model IACM for the Public Sector Overview. Diakses pada 8 September 2016. https://na.theiia.org/iiarf/Public%20Documents/Internal%20Audit%20Capability%20Model%20IACM%20for%20the%20Public%20Sector%20Overview.pdf.van Rensburg, J. J. (2014). Internal audit capability: A public sector case17study (M.Com.). University of Pretoria (South Africa). South Africa. Diakses pada 28 September 2016. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.ugm.ac.id/docview/1703998753/abstract/E772FA80A524B83PQ/1)Wijihastuti, R., (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Peningkatan Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) Pada Pemerintah Daerah Di Wilayah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Tesis S2 Magister Studi Kebijakan Universitas Gadjah Mada. Diakses pada 28 September 2016



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v5i3.59277

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 728 | views : 1034

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

 

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

2302 - 1500